ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

USO going

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
DGH
Posts: 710
Joined: 13 Dec 2014, 18:04
Gender: Male
Location: Neither here nor there

Re: USO going

Post by DGH »

postiepete2 wrote: ↑
27 Nov 2020, 16:17

What about non drivers????
That issue is clouded for RM by the fact that most offices will have a number of routes that can be done on foot with van support, or can only sensibly be done on foot with van support (no point in having four or five vans drive round a market town centre's one way system where there's limited parking anyway) - so it'd be a bit harder for them to argue there was no place for non-drivers.

But in RM's ideal world there would be no duty holders (probably no fixed duties, in fact) and no non-drivers, let's not kid ourselves on that score.
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 12195
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

Re: USO going

Post by SpacePhoenix »

DGH wrote: ↑
27 Nov 2020, 16:31
postiepete2 wrote: ↑
27 Nov 2020, 16:17

What about non drivers????
That issue is clouded for RM by the fact that most offices will have a number of routes that can be done on foot with van support, or can only sensibly be done on foot with van support (no point in having four or five vans drive round a market town centre's one way system where there's limited parking anyway) - so it'd be a bit harder for them to argue there was no place for non-drivers.

But in RM's ideal world there would be no duty holders (probably no fixed duties, in fact) and no non-drivers, let's not kid ourselves on that score.
That's going to depend long term on whatever RM's strategy is for where DOs are located. My gut feeling is that long term we'll see a lot more DO mergers and they'll be nowhere near the area they actually cover
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3226
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: USO going

Post by Acca Dacca »

postiepete2 wrote: ↑
27 Nov 2020, 16:17
wacko74 wrote: ↑
27 Nov 2020, 03:28
I'd love to reduce my hours and just work sat & sun delivering only packets.

And I really don't think anyone has to worry about losing their job, as others have said with natural wastage and perhaps (if we're lucky) a few VR's I think there'll be no compulsory redundancies at all.
What about non drivers????
Monday to Friday shifts hopefully
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
rainbowwarrior72
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 431
Joined: 07 Nov 2009, 11:14
Gender: Male

Re: USO going

Post by rainbowwarrior72 »

I take back the bit about the bullshit bit I personally think if the management does pursue this as I think they will it will be wrong for the business as a whole the future is 7day delivery service
Aquarius
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 148
Joined: 20 Apr 2008, 11:40

Re: USO going

Post by Aquarius »

SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑
27 Nov 2020, 16:45
DGH wrote: ↑
27 Nov 2020, 16:31
postiepete2 wrote: ↑
27 Nov 2020, 16:17

What about non drivers????
That issue is clouded for RM by the fact that most offices will have a number of routes that can be done on foot with van support, or can only sensibly be done on foot with van support (no point in having four or five vans drive round a market town centre's one way system where there's limited parking anyway) - so it'd be a bit harder for them to argue there was no place for non-drivers.

But in RM's ideal world there would be no duty holders (probably no fixed duties, in fact) and no non-drivers, let's not kid ourselves on that score.
That's going to depend long term on whatever RM's strategy is for where DOs are located. My gut feeling is that long term we'll see a lot more DO mergers and they'll be nowhere near the area they actually cover


100% agree
Anyone know how many DO's are there in the UK ?