What is it with you and the pathetic name calling?Dumpys Rusty Nuts wrote: Unfortunately some people use THE CARD, at every opportunity, your mate cash city is renowned for it.
How old are you?
What is it with you and the pathetic name calling?Dumpys Rusty Nuts wrote: Unfortunately some people use THE CARD, at every opportunity, your mate cash city is renowned for it.
So that's as deep as your thinking goes then? Nothing further to add, other than some dumb insult?clashcityrocker wrote:Hang on while I laugh at your stupidity.Tman wrote: Gotta love the Left-leaning non-intelligencia though.
There is nothing funnier than a pseudo intellectual.
clashcityrocker wrote:So to recap:
The original post was about a manager putting an offensive racist slur on Facebook, apparently not his first offence.
The OPG asked for advice. Should he report it.
I posted: (and you can check on page 2).
If he made a racist comment it should be reported.
You posted: (among other rubbish)
Sadly it's all too easy to see how the Stasi, Gestapo and KGB etc were able to flourish; one of the nastier sides of human nature of some people, the willingness to grass up others for their own sad enjoyment.
.......welcome to 21st century UK, where some clearly feel that it's acceptable to jeopardise someone's job for the foolish act of posting dumb things on Facebook. Sad old world....
but the willingness of some (as evidenced on here) to drop some one in it over something minor shows how easily secret police gather info from the nasty little bubblers of the world, didn't you? What a great sense of personal satisfaction those sad individuals must have when they go home at night. "I dobbed someone in it today......what a worthwhile up-standing little man I am"
So if the manager made a racist comment on Facebook, should it be reported? He doesn't say it was "something minor" but something incredibly offensive.
That's all the OPG asked. He didn't ask for you to start pontificating in poor English about the state of the world.
Coming up to 50, one time labour stalwart, no longer , I have woke up to the drivel fed to me and every other working class bloke in this country. Take as step back and have a good strong lookclashcityrocker wrote:What is it with you and the pathetic name calling?Dumpys Rusty Nuts wrote: Unfortunately some people use THE CARD, at every opportunity, your mate cash city is renowned for it.
How old are you?
Why do you act like a 9 year old then?Dumpys Rusty Nuts wrote:Coming up to 50,clashcityrocker wrote:What is it with you and the pathetic name calling?Dumpys Rusty Nuts wrote: Unfortunately some people use THE CARD, at every opportunity, your mate cash city is renowned for it.
How old are you?
Typical left wing nonsense. So what you are implying is everything is ok, immigration IS NOT affecting our housing, schools, nhs ,WAGE STRUCTURE something you as a union stalwart should be looking at re the minimum wage, Wake up people. we are on flood alert. and I don't mean waterfishtank wrote:Why?Dumpys Rusty Nuts wrote:We should ALL remember it is the LABOUR party who got us in this particular mess
None of the parties UKIP included give a flying f**k about your immigration fixation other than playing to your own misguided anxieties for some cheap votes so what difference does it make who did what to who and when. Money/economic policy drives immigration/migration policy, f**k all else.
clashcityrocker wrote:Why do you act like a 9 year old then?Dumpys Rusty Nuts wrote:Coming up to 50,clashcityrocker wrote:What is it with you and the pathetic name calling?Dumpys Rusty Nuts wrote: Unfortunately some people use THE CARD, at every opportunity, your mate cash city is renowned for it.
How old are you?
Given a big swerve then to the point of the basic premise of "innocent until proven guilty"? Best gloss over that one,eh Clash?clashcityrocker wrote:So to recap:
The original post was about a manager putting an offensive racist slur on Facebook, apparently not his first offence.
The OPG asked for advice. Should he report it.
I posted: (and you can check on page 2).
If he made a racist comment it should be reported.
You posted: (among other rubbish)
Sadly it's all too easy to see how the Stasi, Gestapo and KGB etc were able to flourish; one of the nastier sides of human nature of some people, the willingness to grass up others for their own sad enjoyment.
.......welcome to 21st century UK, where some clearly feel that it's acceptable to jeopardise someone's job for the foolish act of posting dumb things on Facebook. Sad old world....
but the willingness of some (as evidenced on here) to drop some one in it over something minor shows how easily secret police gather info from the nasty little bubblers of the world, didn't you? What a great sense of personal satisfaction those sad individuals must have when they go home at night. "I dobbed someone in it today......what a worthwhile up-standing little man I am"
So if the manager made a r etc etc yap yap.
Surely the "innocent until proven guilty" part comes after the reporting of an alleged offence.Tman wrote:Given a big swerve then to the point of the basic premise of "innocent until proven guilty"? Best gloss over that one,eh Clash?
I'm starting to think Clash has your age about right.Dumpys Rusty Nuts wrote:Typical left wing nonsense. So what you are implying is everything is ok, immigration IS NOT affecting our housing, schools, nhs ,WAGE STRUCTURE something you as a union stalwart should be looking at re the minimum wage, Wake up people. we are on flood alert. and I don't mean waterfishtank wrote:Why?Dumpys Rusty Nuts wrote:We should ALL remember it is the LABOUR party who got us in this particular mess
None of the parties UKIP included give a flying f**k about your immigration fixation other than playing to your own misguided anxieties for some cheap votes so what difference does it make who did what to who and when. Money/economic policy drives immigration/migration policy, f**k all else.
Is Scottish a foreign language already? Is simple comprehension a thing of the past?fishtank wrote:Tman wrote:Given a big swerve then to the point of the basic premise of "innocent until proven guilty"?
The "innocence" or guilt of the manager will be subject to an investigation but what has that got to do with the decision to report the alleged incident?
Where is that then?Tman wrote: and then moved on to Clash's eagerness to believe the DOM was guilty