Agenda for growth - section 5.4 "external mediation"

[fishtank]

The law is not unemotional because the law is interpreted by a human. One who has had his/her ear bent at various private parties, meetings and high society functions by the supposedly great and the good all wearing the same tie. If you think we're walking into a level playing field on Monday you're very wrong.

[LaggyBand]

so, royal mail are going to court to get an injunction to prohibit our strike ballot under the guise, that they have a legal binding process to go through first, shows you the contempt that they hold for the workforce, I would assume, by closing the pension scheme by executive action, it would invalidate the process anyway, you can't have it both ways!!!! any business that ignores a virtual 90% yes vote for strike action, has to have total disregard for the CWU and it's members, royal mail have shown by their actions, ( Moya and her henchmen, not being present at any of the talks) they are not fit to run this company and should all resign!!!

It would invalidate the agreement yes and if a judge says otherwise then he/she is obviously in the pocket of RM.

As I pointed out on a previous thread, the law is unemotional, it decides on legislation drawn up by parliament,which the court interprets the will of parliament.

If it worked as cleanly as that there would never be a successful appeal. In anything.

There's loads.