We rarely have a public vote on anything. The public has its say at a general election and votes for the party the believe best represents their views. Those elected then debate the topics of the day and pass laws this is the method that the UK has worked under since votes for all and this is how the death sentence was repealed. So in a long winded way what I am saying is that a decision has been reached through a recognised and legal democratic processes, yet you have a right to debate about bringing the death sentence back. This surely in turn allows those who voted "No" to the agreement to attempt to change those who did not vote or those who voted "Yes". Its democracy in action and this is what I was addressing in your post :dog bait wrote:their was never and has never been a public vote in the death penalty,and never will be.every day of the week the hung um high brigade would win hands down.in nearly all countries in the world.of coarse the eu law now makes it impossable to repeal this law anyway.
personally i would hang all multiple murderers,and murderers in a nother criminal act.ie,bank robber shooting a policeman or cashier.but thats just me.
As to the death sentence I am a fence sitter.well being a union and majority rule rules ,if 90percent couldnt give a toss.your supposed to accept it not try your hardest to convert them all to your own thoughts.basic union princples
Some crimes may deserve death such as child rape and murder of children, but where do you draw the line between punishment and revenge.