ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Why no work to rule?

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
cpsteve
Posts: 699
Joined: 20 Apr 2016, 15:46
Gender: Male

Re: Why no work to rule?

Post by cpsteve »

Bosley wrote: ↑
25 Aug 2022, 11:05
Come in at your start time, take your breaks, and go home at your finish time!
You mean like most other jobs wont happen. Hope we get a decent pay rise first thats easily settled if the company want it, then the union negotiate on the other changes maybe a one off payment for losing allowances, i think if the changes are watered down it could be settled we are all better off talking striking is a lose lose.
PAClark543
Posts: 12
Joined: 10 Sep 2020, 19:45
Gender: Male

Re: Why no work to rule?

Post by PAClark543 »

My view is that the union hasn't considered other forms of industrial action - just gone for the strike (which should be a last resort). There are a number of things that we could do which would hit the RM finances without costing members their days pay. Imagine the chaos and financial impact if we continued to deliver post and parcels yet refused to take PDAs out with us! The premium products that RM are so keen on would become worthless! This kind of action would be sustainable and could go on for ages. Plus we would continue to be paid. There are other forms of industrial action other than striking - shame the union hasn't explored these.
Woody Guthrie
Posts: 5166
Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: Why no work to rule?

Post by Woody Guthrie »

Imagine the chaos and financial impact if we continued to deliver post and parcels yet refused to take PDAs out with us!
You can't do that.
It would be refusing a reasonable request and would lead to suspension which would lead to unofficial industrial action.
Only dead fish follow the current
GRS
Posts: 826
Joined: 15 Jun 2015, 18:38
Gender: Female
Location: South West

Re: Why no work to rule?

Post by GRS »

PAClark543 wrote: ↑
25 Aug 2022, 19:12
My view is that the union hasn't considered other forms of industrial action - just gone for the strike (which should be a last resort). There are a number of things that we could do which would hit the RM finances without costing members their days pay. Imagine the chaos and financial impact if we continued to deliver post and parcels yet refused to take PDAs out with us! The premium products that RM are so keen on would become worthless! This kind of action would be sustainable and could go on for ages. Plus we would continue to be paid. There are other forms of industrial action other than striking - shame the union hasn't explored these.
WTF!!!!!
SMS1969
Posts: 1022
Joined: 28 Jun 2021, 11:36
Gender: Male

Re: Why no work to rule?

Post by SMS1969 »

:funneh
PAClark543 wrote: ↑
25 Aug 2022, 19:12
My view is that the union hasn't considered other forms of industrial action - just gone for the strike (which should be a last resort). There are a number of things that we could do which would hit the RM finances without costing members their days pay. Imagine the chaos and financial impact if we continued to deliver post and parcels yet refused to take PDAs out with us! The premium products that RM are so keen on would become worthless! This kind of action would be sustainable and could go on for ages. Plus we would continue to be paid. There are other forms of industrial action other than striking - shame the union hasn't explored these.
Frankie15
Posts: 200
Joined: 17 Oct 2019, 16:48
Gender: Male

Re: Why no work to rule?

Post by Frankie15 »

Huh?
priority102
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 520
Joined: 04 Aug 2009, 18:57
Gender: Female

Re: Why no work to rule?

Post by priority102 »

PAClark543 wrote: ↑
25 Aug 2022, 19:12
My view is that the union hasn't considered other forms of industrial action - just gone for the strike (which should be a last resort). There are a number of things that we could do which would hit the RM finances without costing members their days pay. Imagine the chaos and financial impact if we continued to deliver post and parcels yet refused to take PDAs out with us! The premium products that RM are so keen on would become worthless! This kind of action would be sustainable and could go on for ages. Plus we would continue to be paid. There are other forms of industrial action other than striking - shame the union hasn't explored these.


If Ward and Pullinger read this post they'll just look to the stars in disbelief and who could blame them. You leave your PDA, a manager requests you take it. You refuse, you're suspended for failing to comply with a reasonable request. Your rep cannot defend the indefensible.

Unbelievable.
ThatsNotPlumb
Posts: 165
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 22:33
Gender: Male

Re: Why no work to rule?

Post by ThatsNotPlumb »

thedonkey wrote: ↑
23 Aug 2022, 16:32
We cannot fold during this period of pay and terms talk. With the cost of greed crisis and inflation so high for many of us losing pay on strike days will cause much hardship, but it is one that we must endure for long term and our families.

Is there an explanation as to why the union has not taken the option of working to rule? If we all committed to working our hours only and not doing overtime or schedule attendance. A week of working to rule would soon cause issues for RM and us employees would not loose a day's pay on strike days.
Part-timers don't do overtime because they love the place, they do it to try & bump their hours up & get as close to a full-time wage as possible.

Wouldn't work or should I say it wouldn't be fair as you'd basically be asking the part-timers to make the most sacrifice as they do most of the OT.. and then there are people who do no OT at all who it would have no impact on.

An actual strike day has a more balanced impact as it effects everyone due in on that day.
PAClark543
Posts: 12
Joined: 10 Sep 2020, 19:45
Gender: Male

Re: Why no work to rule?

Post by PAClark543 »

priority102 wrote: ↑
25 Aug 2022, 21:50
PAClark543 wrote: ↑
25 Aug 2022, 19:12
My view is that the union hasn't considered other forms of industrial action - just gone for the strike (which should be a last resort). There are a number of things that we could do which would hit the RM finances without costing members their days pay. Imagine the chaos and financial impact if we continued to deliver post and parcels yet refused to take PDAs out with us! The premium products that RM are so keen on would become worthless! This kind of action would be sustainable and could go on for ages. Plus we would continue to be paid. There are other forms of industrial action other than striking - shame the union hasn't explored these.


If Ward and Pullinger read this post they'll just look to the stars in disbelief and who could blame them. You leave your PDA, a manager requests you take it. You refuse, you're suspended for failing to comply with a reasonable request. Your rep cannot defend the indefensible.

Unbelievable.
If the union instructed members not to take out PDA's then colleagues would be protected in the same way as when we have unauthorised absence (strike days). I actually wrote to Terry Pullinger. Twice (Didn't bother to reply to my first email). I eventually got fobbed off with one of his policy advisers who was deeply condescending and disinterested in anything I had to say. Let's just say that I'm becoming less of a fan of the negotiating team.
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: Why no work to rule?

Post by DirtyHarry »

Think it will have to come to that.
Start on time, finish on time, take your breaks, and inbetween, do whatever the manager wants you to do.
No overtime, no staying out beyond your time.
We are now entering autumn.
Royal Mail would be in a state of absolute chaos before black Wednesday was even on the horizon.
Woody Guthrie
Posts: 5166
Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: Why no work to rule?

Post by Woody Guthrie »

If the union instructed members not to take out PDA's then colleagues would be protected in the same way as when we have unauthorised absence (strike days).
No... they wouldn't.
Industrial action doesn't work like that.
You can't just decide not to do certain parts of your contractual obligations and expect to still remain on pay and the union could not ballot on industrial action based on it.

It's quite frankly nonsense mate.
Only dead fish follow the current
norris9
Posts: 2696
Joined: 27 Feb 2019, 17:32
Gender: Female

Re: Why no work to rule?

Post by norris9 »

ThatsNotPlumb wrote: ↑
25 Aug 2022, 23:13

Part-timers don't do overtime because they love the place, they do it to try & bump their hours up & get as close to a full-time wage as possible.

Wouldn't work or should I say it wouldn't be fair as you'd basically be asking the part-timers to make the most sacrifice as they do most of the OT.. and then there are people who do no OT at all who it would have no impact on.

An actual strike day has a more balanced impact as it effects everyone due in on that day.
In my office it's mostly the full timers that do the overtime. There are many Full Timers that must do 55+ hour weeks.

I have seen full timers doing ridiculous overtime this week. It doesn't make sense to me why you would work your butt off on a week in which we have a strike day. Let the company suffer. Do the overtime to make up for the strikes in the weeks before the strikes and the weeks after.

No doubt tomorrow we'll have Posties taking out overtime. Starting early. Working for free through their breaks. Meanwhile the company you work for is seemingly planning on turning the business into a gig economy, or at the very least wanting to pay you 8% less than they should be whilst making your terms and conditions worse.
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 12194
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

Re: Why no work to rule?

Post by SpacePhoenix »

norris9 wrote: ↑
26 Aug 2022, 12:19
In my office it's mostly the full timers that do the overtime. There are many Full Timers that must do 55+ hour weeks.

If the same holds true in many offices, it wouldn't surprise me to see RM try and force all FT back to being 4ohrs per week, which in effect would be a pay cut
Woody Guthrie
Posts: 5166
Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: Why no work to rule?

Post by Woody Guthrie »

SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑
26 Aug 2022, 12:25
norris9 wrote: ↑
26 Aug 2022, 12:19
In my office it's mostly the full timers that do the overtime. There are many Full Timers that must do 55+ hour weeks.

If the same holds true in many offices, it wouldn't surprise me to see RM try and force all FT back to being 4ohrs per week, which in effect would be a pay cut
The last thing the business wants to do is add more core hours to the operation.
The arse would fall out of their efficiency figures.
Only dead fish follow the current