Having recently had a stage 3 grievance hearing i seriously wonder why anyone bothers!
Our Grievance was over both national and local agreements being broken within our office by management.
The stage 3 hearing went well and i can say quite honestly that i was surprised that the person sent to hear our grievance was sympathetic to our case.
Just this week my DOm had a quiet word with me to say that we should hear the final outcome sometime soon, but did i realise that the person dealing with our case would have little say in the final outcome. That powers much higher would dictate a response to our grievance and that would be the end of the matter !!
Now i din;t honestly expect much from this to start with, but if this is the way it's dealt with, then why do we bother and why is the procedure in place in the first place?
more importantly - why are RM allowed to get away with these things?
These are national and local binding agreements being openly broken.
If anyone wants to know more details there are other posts by me about this.