ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Parcels - more or less?

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
UnhappyGremlin
Posts: 2685
Joined: 18 May 2012, 20:49
Gender: Male
Location: Hiding

Re: Parcels - more or less?

Post by UnhappyGremlin »

SpacePhoenix wrote:
Hitcher wrote:Less packets delivered = Less Post Offices needed!
With Post Offices not being part of the RM group now i can't see why they're not allowed to offer services of RM's rivals
It has already been discussed as a possibility, and a Subpostmaster I know thinks it will happen in the next few years.
Sometimes, I wish I wasn't a Rep.
fng
Posts: 462
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 16:54
Gender: Male

Re: Parcels - more or less?

Post by fng »

SpacePhoenix wrote:
Hitcher wrote:Less packets delivered = Less Post Offices needed!
With Post Offices not being part of the RM group now i can't see why they're not allowed to offer services of RM's rivals

Mine does - offers my hermes. crap but cheap
Tripitaka: "You should live without fear. There's as much chance of good things as bad things."
Sandy: "It's a cheerful philosophy and I've heard it from people before. They're all dead now."
Monkey "Excuse me when I say, that you really are extraordinarily dim!"
north london driver
Posts: 560
Joined: 18 Aug 2010, 21:51
Gender: Male

Re: Parcels - more or less?

Post by north london driver »

with the price going up this month who put the prices up, some unnamed person decided to increase the price but why.
the parcels and packets were making profits for royal mail so who was the person?. if they stay where they are now what will the next damage to royal mail will they hope to acheive.
its time to name and shame.
cyclemech1
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 334
Joined: 20 Jul 2009, 20:46
Gender: Male

Re: Parcels - more or less?

Post by cyclemech1 »

north london driver wrote:with the price going up this month who put the prices up, some unnamed person decided to increase the price but why.
the parcels and packets were making profits for royal mail so who was the person?. if they stay where they are now what will the next damage to royal mail will they hope to acheive.
its time to name and shame.
Same person who thought up 'Consignia' and 'Park & Loop'. :roll:
lincskevin
Posts: 18
Joined: 21 Sep 2012, 17:19
Gender: Male

Re: Parcels - more or less?

Post by lincskevin »

couriers deliver quicker thats why less and less people use royal mail o send parcels ...... no ones going to pay higher rates for a slower services
most first class parcels take 3-5 days by royal

couriers like city link deliver next day
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Parcels - more or less?

Post by fishtank »

lincskevin wrote:couriers deliver quicker
Yep they're fast.
Watch why they're fast on Channel 4 tonight at 8pm Channel 4+1 at 9pm and available on 4oD. :chuckle

http://www.channel4.com/programmes/disp ... icles/home" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
north london driver
Posts: 560
Joined: 18 Aug 2010, 21:51
Gender: Male

Re: Parcels - more or less?

Post by north london driver »

lincskevin wrote:couriers deliver quicker thats why less and less people use royal mail o send parcels ...... no ones going to pay higher rates for a slower services
most first class parcels take 3-5 days by royal

couriers like city link deliver next day
lincskevin the only reason they work quicker is they have had the good parcels away,as for 3-5days for first class parcels by royal mail that dont happen. i check most of dates on the parcels that come to my office 1-2 days.unless it does not have a full address then may be delayed. if you knew the lenght that royal mail staff go to every day you would not come out with this proposed statement.