oh and to right
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
New Deal?
-
Clappedoutpostie
- Posts: 1262
- Joined: 05 Nov 2021, 21:46
- Gender: Male
Re: New Deal?
The Postman wrote: ↑05 Nov 2022, 19:24Why hasn't alternatives to RM's proposals been looked into?
Later starts - Why not split mail and parcels, have dedicated parcel drivers. Mail could be delivered by full and part timers 5 days a week first thing in the morning
That is their plan.
-
TopperGas
- Posts: 3502
- Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
- Gender: Male
Re: New Deal?
I thought their plan was for all the deliveries to start 2+ hours later? The rural's are an issue as they can't have dedicated parcel routes.Clappedoutpostie wrote: ↑05 Nov 2022, 20:28The Postman wrote: ↑05 Nov 2022, 19:24Why hasn't alternatives to RM's proposals been looked into?
Later starts - Why not split mail and parcels, have dedicated parcel drivers. Mail could be delivered by full and part timers 5 days a week first thing in the morning
That is their plan.
-
Clappedoutpostie
- Posts: 1262
- Joined: 05 Nov 2021, 21:46
- Gender: Male
Re: New Deal?
I think the plan for ours is for us to start 75 minutes later, we will have parcel routes but they will be done from another office. Not sure why the rurals can’t have dedicated parcel routes, every other courier must operate there as well. How will the LAT’s connect with the rurals then unless the rural start times are going to be even later still?
-
guardianangel
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: 21 Feb 2020, 19:40
- Gender: Male
Re: New Deal?
7% this year backdated and 7% next year no strings,no more changes to conditions, if they make it 10% this year and 10 % next year i would think about 1 sunday in 4.
-
Gary55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 354
- Joined: 29 Jun 2021, 21:02
- Gender: Male
- Location: london
Re: New Deal?
Yes I'd consider 1 Sunday every 4 years. But only because I'm nearly 60
-
NWpostie
- Posts: 3619
- Joined: 04 Aug 2007, 17:32
- Gender: Male
- Location: Sector 001 Borg Collective, 6 o f 9
Re: New Deal?
Depends what's in the deal, we should keep our strike dates active and ready to use, if the negotiations fails it's ready to go.
Six of Nine loves Seven of Nine, together in Electric Dreams.
-
aiden01
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 7001
- Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
- Gender: Male
Re: New Deal?
U having a wet dreamguardianangel wrote: ↑05 Nov 2022, 21:037% this year backdated and 7% next year no strings,no more changes to conditions, if they make it 10% this year and 10 % next year i would think about 1 sunday in 4.
-
aiden01
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 7001
- Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
- Gender: Male
-
emu72
- Posts: 105
- Joined: 11 Feb 2011, 16:52
- Gender: Male
Re: New Deal?
The working people who keep the cogs turning and make millions for the company,simon and the shareholders are just s**t on from a great height and it seems that every other year we have to try and get a half decent wage through lengthy negotiations.its like getting blood out of a stone.we deserve more respect from the likes of simon thompson.without us he would have f*** all.keep the workforce happy and you lift morale
-
redlen
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: 21 Dec 2021, 12:05
- Gender: Male
Re: New Deal?
If or when any agreement is reached, will it be worth the paper it is written on?
In my opinion, give it six months at most.
It is almost certain, GLS will be off loaded to VESA. Daniel Kretinsky has made no secret with his intent. As GLS previously funded deliveries etc with cross subsidy, how can any new agreement be funded if Royal Mail are currently losing a million a day?
In my opinion, give it six months at most.
It is almost certain, GLS will be off loaded to VESA. Daniel Kretinsky has made no secret with his intent. As GLS previously funded deliveries etc with cross subsidy, how can any new agreement be funded if Royal Mail are currently losing a million a day?
-
LouBarlow
- Posts: 4709
- Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56
Re: New Deal?
Good luck with that.guardianangel wrote: ↑05 Nov 2022, 21:037% this year backdated and 7% next year no strings,no more changes to conditions, if they make it 10% this year and 10 % next year i would think about 1 sunday in 4.
-
NWpostie
- Posts: 3619
- Joined: 04 Aug 2007, 17:32
- Gender: Male
- Location: Sector 001 Borg Collective, 6 o f 9
Re: New Deal?
VESA is just another asset stripper like American corporates taking over British companies, load debt on it, strip it down and destroy it, taking the profits leaving wrecked lives.redlen wrote: ↑06 Nov 2022, 07:18If or when any agreement is reached, will it be worth the paper it is written on?
In my opinion, give it six months at most.
It is almost certain, GLS will be off loaded to VESA. Daniel Kretinsky has made no secret with his intent. As GLS previously funded deliveries etc with cross subsidy, how can any new agreement be funded if Royal Mail are currently losing a million a day?
If GLS gets split off from letter, Royal Mail letter could go bust unless the Government takes it on, the public outrage would topple any Government.
Six of Nine loves Seven of Nine, together in Electric Dreams.
-
Tickson
- Posts: 17
- Joined: 18 May 2017, 21:55
- Gender: Male
Re: New Deal?
This is exactly the issue. It is the group (IDS) as a whole, not royal mail, that is listed.
You can damn well bet therefore that dividends and executive bonuses are paid to shareholders based on GROUP performance, not Royal Mails individual performance. If STs nails Royal Mail to the wall for the benefit of the GROUP he'll get his bonus for helping the GROUP. Hell maybe he will resign, AFTER the damage is done. I'm sure he'll be rewarded well for this.
As has been pointed out even in the mainstream media, the refusal to cross subsidize is an absolute cynical CHOICE, not a necessity. They obviously believe it would be more profitable for them, in the greedy short term, to let RM wither and die and to sell the rest. Perhaps the government will have to take it up to have some form of postal service. They are making a mockery of the legal obligation to the universal service.
Amazon are one of the worlds biggest companies precisely BECAUSE they cross subsidize. Amazon Web Services, which powers literally 1/3rd of the internet with cloud services (including the CIA for gods sakes) provides ONE THIRD of ALL of Amazons revenue. Imagine the billions! And what Amazon do is take that revenue and open into new markets at a loss, control there and dominate, and rake it in.
I'm not suggesting the RM should become anything like Amazons in their world dominance, but they COULD cross subsidise and invest in taking Royal Mail forward in a sustainable way and invest in their employees. But no, slash and burn, easy money, why bother with all that?
Of course a lot of us wouldnt care if at the end of day Royal Mail alone gets nationalised again and the rest buggers off to the city boys. But you should be pissed, because GLS was bought whilst RM was in public hands. Like a lot of the assets that have carved off, that was taxpayer money that bought all that!
-
Postie.11
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 05 Jan 2016, 15:44
- Gender: Male
Re: New Deal?
The CWU told us at the start we should be getting an above inflation, no strings pay rise. So at least 10%, and that’s just for this year, not for 2 years. They’re obviously not going to achieve this. I have no idea of what they will actually accept? Does anyone?