ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

New Deal?

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat

Would 7% back dated from April 1ST be enough to halt the strike if all changes were off the table?

Poll ended at 03 Feb 2023, 16:47

YES
427
64%
NO
243
36%
 
Total votes: 670

worktotime
Posts: 2865
Joined: 14 May 2010, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: New Deal?

Post by worktotime »

yubin282 wrote:
05 Nov 2022, 18:54
Moose67 wrote:
05 Nov 2022, 18:35
Don't trust him he will milk it and get Xmas out the way and then he implement everything he wants get rid of him first then deal with Keith Williams :dance :dance :dance
and Ricky McAuley
oh and to right :thumbup
Clappedoutpostie
Posts: 1262
Joined: 05 Nov 2021, 21:46
Gender: Male

Re: New Deal?

Post by Clappedoutpostie »

The Postman wrote:
05 Nov 2022, 19:24
Why hasn't alternatives to RM's proposals been looked into?

Later starts - Why not split mail and parcels, have dedicated parcel drivers. Mail could be delivered by full and part timers 5 days a week first thing in the morning

That is their plan.
TopperGas
Posts: 3500
Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
Gender: Male

Re: New Deal?

Post by TopperGas »

Clappedoutpostie wrote:
05 Nov 2022, 20:28
The Postman wrote:
05 Nov 2022, 19:24
Why hasn't alternatives to RM's proposals been looked into?

Later starts - Why not split mail and parcels, have dedicated parcel drivers. Mail could be delivered by full and part timers 5 days a week first thing in the morning

That is their plan.
I thought their plan was for all the deliveries to start 2+ hours later? The rural's are an issue as they can't have dedicated parcel routes.
Clappedoutpostie
Posts: 1262
Joined: 05 Nov 2021, 21:46
Gender: Male

Re: New Deal?

Post by Clappedoutpostie »

TopperGas wrote:
05 Nov 2022, 20:37
I thought their plan was for all the deliveries to start 2+ hours later? The rural's are an issue as they can't have dedicated parcel routes.
I think the plan for ours is for us to start 75 minutes later, we will have parcel routes but they will be done from another office. Not sure why the rurals can’t have dedicated parcel routes, every other courier must operate there as well. How will the LAT’s connect with the rurals then unless the rural start times are going to be even later still?
guardianangel
Posts: 1845
Joined: 21 Feb 2020, 19:40
Gender: Male

Re: New Deal?

Post by guardianangel »

7% this year backdated and 7% next year no strings,no more changes to conditions, if they make it 10% this year and 10 % next year i would think about 1 sunday in 4.
Gary55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 354
Joined: 29 Jun 2021, 21:02
Gender: Male
Location: london

Re: New Deal?

Post by Gary55 »

Yes I'd consider 1 Sunday every 4 years. But only because I'm nearly 60
NWpostie
Posts: 3618
Joined: 04 Aug 2007, 17:32
Gender: Male
Location: Sector 001 Borg Collective, 6 o f 9

Re: New Deal?

Post by NWpostie »

Depends what's in the deal, we should keep our strike dates active and ready to use, if the negotiations fails it's ready to go.
Six of Nine loves Seven of Nine, together in Electric Dreams.
aiden01
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 7001
Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
Gender: Male

Re: New Deal?

Post by aiden01 »

guardianangel wrote:
05 Nov 2022, 21:03
7% this year backdated and 7% next year no strings,no more changes to conditions, if they make it 10% this year and 10 % next year i would think about 1 sunday in 4.
U having a wet dream :evil/mad
aiden01
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 7001
Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
Gender: Male

Re: New Deal?

Post by aiden01 »

NWpostie wrote:
06 Nov 2022, 00:06
Depends what's in the deal, we should keep our strike dates active and ready to use, if the negotiations fails it's ready to go.
Strike dates are active..
emu72
Posts: 105
Joined: 11 Feb 2011, 16:52
Gender: Male

Re: New Deal?

Post by emu72 »

The working people who keep the cogs turning and make millions for the company,simon and the shareholders are just s**t on from a great height and it seems that every other year we have to try and get a half decent wage through lengthy negotiations.its like getting blood out of a stone.we deserve more respect from the likes of simon thompson.without us he would have f*** all.keep the workforce happy and you lift morale
redlen
Posts: 1347
Joined: 21 Dec 2021, 12:05
Gender: Male

Re: New Deal?

Post by redlen »

If or when any agreement is reached, will it be worth the paper it is written on?

In my opinion, give it six months at most.

It is almost certain, GLS will be off loaded to VESA. Daniel Kretinsky has made no secret with his intent. As GLS previously funded deliveries etc with cross subsidy, how can any new agreement be funded if Royal Mail are currently losing a million a day?
LouBarlow
Posts: 4709
Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56

Re: New Deal?

Post by LouBarlow »

guardianangel wrote:
05 Nov 2022, 21:03
7% this year backdated and 7% next year no strings,no more changes to conditions, if they make it 10% this year and 10 % next year i would think about 1 sunday in 4.
Good luck with that.
NWpostie
Posts: 3618
Joined: 04 Aug 2007, 17:32
Gender: Male
Location: Sector 001 Borg Collective, 6 o f 9

Re: New Deal?

Post by NWpostie »

redlen wrote:
06 Nov 2022, 07:18
If or when any agreement is reached, will it be worth the paper it is written on?

In my opinion, give it six months at most.

It is almost certain, GLS will be off loaded to VESA. Daniel Kretinsky has made no secret with his intent. As GLS previously funded deliveries etc with cross subsidy, how can any new agreement be funded if Royal Mail are currently losing a million a day?
VESA is just another asset stripper like American corporates taking over British companies, load debt on it, strip it down and destroy it, taking the profits leaving wrecked lives.

If GLS gets split off from letter, Royal Mail letter could go bust unless the Government takes it on, the public outrage would topple any Government.
Six of Nine loves Seven of Nine, together in Electric Dreams.
Tickson
Posts: 17
Joined: 18 May 2017, 21:55
Gender: Male

Re: New Deal?

Post by Tickson »

redlen wrote:
06 Nov 2022, 07:18
It is almost certain, GLS will be off loaded to VESA. Daniel Kretinsky has made no secret with his intent. As GLS previously funded deliveries etc with cross subsidy, how can any new agreement be funded if Royal Mail are currently losing a million a day?
This is exactly the issue. It is the group (IDS) as a whole, not royal mail, that is listed.

You can damn well bet therefore that dividends and executive bonuses are paid to shareholders based on GROUP performance, not Royal Mails individual performance. If STs nails Royal Mail to the wall for the benefit of the GROUP he'll get his bonus for helping the GROUP. Hell maybe he will resign, AFTER the damage is done. I'm sure he'll be rewarded well for this.

As has been pointed out even in the mainstream media, the refusal to cross subsidize is an absolute cynical CHOICE, not a necessity. They obviously believe it would be more profitable for them, in the greedy short term, to let RM wither and die and to sell the rest. Perhaps the government will have to take it up to have some form of postal service. They are making a mockery of the legal obligation to the universal service.

Amazon are one of the worlds biggest companies precisely BECAUSE they cross subsidize. Amazon Web Services, which powers literally 1/3rd of the internet with cloud services (including the CIA for gods sakes) provides ONE THIRD of ALL of Amazons revenue. Imagine the billions! And what Amazon do is take that revenue and open into new markets at a loss, control there and dominate, and rake it in.

I'm not suggesting the RM should become anything like Amazons in their world dominance, but they COULD cross subsidise and invest in taking Royal Mail forward in a sustainable way and invest in their employees. But no, slash and burn, easy money, why bother with all that?

Of course a lot of us wouldnt care if at the end of day Royal Mail alone gets nationalised again and the rest buggers off to the city boys. But you should be pissed, because GLS was bought whilst RM was in public hands. Like a lot of the assets that have carved off, that was taxpayer money that bought all that!
Postie.11
Posts: 7
Joined: 05 Jan 2016, 15:44
Gender: Male

Re: New Deal?

Post by Postie.11 »

The CWU told us at the start we should be getting an above inflation, no strings pay rise. So at least 10%, and that’s just for this year, not for 2 years. They’re obviously not going to achieve this. I have no idea of what they will actually accept? Does anyone?