ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

A ''No Strike Clause'' in past agreement

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
Woody Guthrie
Posts: 5166
Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: A ''No Strike Clause'' in past agreement

Post by Woody Guthrie »

The Agenda for Growth agreement stopped Royal Mail from doing that for 10 years.
That's a giant leap of faith Martin.
It's also a giant pile of something else.

I know you were a fanboy of the legal protections, you were after all one of its greatest salesmen but any decent lawyer would tell you it had more holes than a string vest and the union was never going to venture anywhere near a court with it.

What stopped a two tier workforce in Royal Mail was a combination of circumstances nothing more, it just wasn't the right time. Had covid not intervened we would probably have faced this 3 years ago. Obviously now is the time.
Only dead fish follow the current
roman
Posts: 259
Joined: 15 Jun 2020, 20:19
Gender: Male

Re: A ''No Strike Clause'' in past agreement

Post by roman »

Hope Simon has read all the above pieces it might confuse him so much he’s forgotten what it was all for in the first place !!!!
roman
Posts: 259
Joined: 15 Jun 2020, 20:19
Gender: Male

Re: A ''No Strike Clause'' in past agreement

Post by roman »

Hope he’s read all of the above views and comments on the disagreement. It might confuse him so much he’s forgotten what it all meant in the first place !!
grchpo
Posts: 488
Joined: 16 Mar 2019, 13:59
Gender: Male

Re: A ''No Strike Clause'' in past agreement

Post by grchpo »

How much money/ wealth has he & his cronies got, his is 77 milion, why does he need anymore at our expense. Why doesn't he just go & spend what he's got & leave us alone, or is he just a greedy pig who likes to have his nose in the trough,,
,
postieblueshirt
Posts: 1241
Joined: 01 Oct 2019, 22:05
Gender: Male

Re: A ''No Strike Clause'' in past agreement

Post by postieblueshirt »

Reading the comments it seems we have opened a can of worms by striking.And I get the feeling striking will not do any good as royal mail hold all the aces?so where to go next can/should we keep fighting.And how on earth would a 2 tier workforce work.with the current p/t f/t and then another set of workers who work more hours than a current full timer...
hans solo
Posts: 3256
Joined: 06 Feb 2011, 18:08
Gender: Male

Re: A ''No Strike Clause'' in past agreement

Post by hans solo »

They won’t recognise our last agreement and they sure as f**k won’t recognise any other
If we don’t strike they rip us to shreds and the job won’t be worth doing you will be as well moving to Amazon
Our terms and conditions will be every bit as bad and probably for less money the way this is heading
We need massive action and we need the tuc on board with other unions
It’s a class war
The little people with the low paid jobs bailed the uk out during covid
Now the bastards want us back in our place
I would rather go down fighting than let the elite rule and lord over us as per normal
If we fall we all fall
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3189
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: A ''No Strike Clause'' in past agreement

Post by Acca Dacca »

postieblueshirt wrote:
25 Sep 2022, 21:37
Reading the comments it seems we have opened a can of worms by striking.And I get the feeling striking will not do any good as royal mail hold all the aces?so where to go next can/should we keep fighting.And how on earth would a 2 tier workforce work.with the current p/t f/t and then another set of workers who work more hours than a current full timer...
The 40 hours for new starts is not new starts on 40 hour contracts but their pay will be based on 40 hours so less per hour pro rata than current part timers who’s pay is based on 37
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
Pidleypoo
Posts: 697
Joined: 17 Dec 2014, 10:05
Gender: Male

Re: A ''No Strike Clause'' in past agreement

Post by Pidleypoo »

So from all I’ve read this week it seems that there’s absolutely no point in striking or voicing any opposition to what are very poor working conditions proposed by Royal Mail as they’re going to bring in absolutely anything they want to

No point in the union anymore then.

We’ll all have to work 10 am to 10 pm and only be paid for about 8 of those hours as the rest will be banked and given back to us at some point in the future ….maybe.

As we’re having to work longer , walk further and faster which will increase the chances of being sick , your sick pay will be worthless.

You’ll have no employment rights working for Royal Mail either.

They’re doing this so people leave apparently ( well , one of the reasons ) but who tf would want to do this job u get those conditions? Most employers are falling over backwards to make jobs attractive these days as there’s not much of pool of work workers fighting for jobs.

I’ll strike when needed and back the people I work with but I’ve never felt so poorly about the job.

I’ll be getting out as soon as I can.

Such a shame this is how it is now.
richietns
Posts: 1070
Joined: 17 Oct 2011, 18:09
Gender: Male

Re: A ''No Strike Clause'' in past agreement

Post by richietns »

Woody Guthrie wrote:
25 Sep 2022, 19:00
The Agenda for Growth agreement stopped Royal Mail from doing that for 10 years.
That's a giant leap of faith Martin.
It's also a giant pile of something else.

I know you were a fanboy of the legal protections, you were after all one of its greatest salesmen but any decent lawyer would tell you it had more holes than a string vest and the union was never going to venture anywhere near a court with it.

What stopped a two tier workforce in Royal Mail was a combination of circumstances nothing more, it just wasn't the right time. Had covid not intervened we would probably have faced this 3 years ago. Obviously now is the time.
I do think Martin is right about slowing this from happening it did seem to stop moya,Rico,its all since Keith Williams took over.
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16413
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: A ''No Strike Clause'' in past agreement

Post by clashcityrocker »

Martin Walsh wrote:
25 Sep 2022, 18:21


My wife works for BT, they have broken up the company with open reach etc, they have outsourced work all round the world where it could be done cheaper, they have franchised and they a two-tier workforce.

Who represents them?
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
Woody Guthrie
Posts: 5166
Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: A ''No Strike Clause'' in past agreement

Post by Woody Guthrie »

I don't think it's a very sensible idea for the CWU to promote the idea that the only way Royal Mail were able to break the chains of this super secure ground breaking legal protection was because the CWU called national industrial action.

It would possibly be better to be more honest and admit that the agreement was about to be broken anyway using any number of potential get out clauses that had been available from the start than promote the same narrative that Simon is pushing that we were the architects of our own downfall.

It's probably time to put egos aside and move on, the agreement is dead now, so is the argument on whether it had any real value in the first place.
Only dead fish follow the current
richietns
Posts: 1070
Joined: 17 Oct 2011, 18:09
Gender: Male

Re: A ''No Strike Clause'' in past agreement

Post by richietns »

I agree the cwu are going to say something today or tomorrow let's see whats next.
Martin Walsh
Posts: 4256
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
Location: neverland

Re: A ''No Strike Clause'' in past agreement

Post by Martin Walsh »

We will have to agree to disagree over whether the Agenda for Growth Legal protections helped to stop , outsourcing , franchising and the break up of the company like so many other privatised companies or whether other circumstances did as you suggest. Neither of us can be proven to be right.

However tomorrow the PE will debate the next phase of strike action and unless that debate needs to go into Wednesday for a decision to be made then by close of play tomorrow all members should know. Remember the Officers make recommendations to the 17 voting members of the Postal Executive, the officers don’t have a vote. The PE are allowed to amend the recommendations.
Pidleypoo
Posts: 697
Joined: 17 Dec 2014, 10:05
Gender: Male

Re: A ''No Strike Clause'' in past agreement

Post by Pidleypoo »

The next wave of action has to be absolutely massive.

It’s literally make or break so whatever is decided , make sure it hits all parts of royal mails business and enough to actually get their attention and be sensible around a deal.
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 11990
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

Re: A ''No Strike Clause'' in past agreement

Post by SpacePhoenix »

Pidleypoo wrote:
26 Sep 2022, 09:17
The next wave of action has to be absolutely massive.

It’s literally make or break so whatever is decided , make sure it hits all parts of royal mails business and enough to actually get their attention and be sensible around a deal.
Just distribution/logistics/network alone would hit RM really hard as nothing could travel between MCs or between MCs and DOs