1 to 1

gunners1 · Post by **gunners1** » 29 Jan 2008, 16:33

any1 had there 1 to 1 meeting yet told we were having them at wtl

Darren Bent · Post by **Darren Bent** » 29 Jan 2008, 16:45

None yet.

madelin4 · Post by **madelin4** » 29 Jan 2008, 16:53

1-1 for what? i dont know about this

Post by **POSTMAN** » 29 Jan 2008, 16:54

http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/forum/vi ... php?t=8854

madelin4 · Post by **madelin4** » 29 Jan 2008, 17:37

POSTMAN wrote:http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/forum/vi ... php?t=8854

Throgg · Post by **Throgg** » 29 Jan 2008, 21:53

Each question from your DOM should have the same answer from you

NO COMMENT

That way you can't incriminate yourself and your DOM can't try and twist anything you would have said to his advantage

postyparker · Post by **postyparker** » 29 Jan 2008, 23:54

Throgg wrote:Each question from your DOM should have the same answer from you

NO COMMENT

That way you can't incriminate yourself and your DOM can't try and twist anything you would have said to his advantage

You are a sad sad sad person.

BELIAL · Post by **BELIAL** » 30 Jan 2008, 00:06

Sign of the times ,Rm thrusting Rawhide industrial relations for you,"our people" the ones that don't matter

DGP1 · Post by **DGP1** » 30 Jan 2008, 01:28

BELIAL wrote:Sign of the times ,Rm thrusting Rawhide industrial relations for you,"our people" the ones that don't matter

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=5SFnvLC83ew

norbert · Post by **norbert** » 30 Jan 2008, 03:58

postyparker wrote:
Throgg wrote:Each question from your DOM should have the same answer from you

NO COMMENT

That way you can't incriminate yourself and your DOM can't try and twist anything you would have said to his advantage
You are a sad sad sad person.

bit corporate? , you'll learn the hard way what they & Royal Mail are really like .RM are very cute @ twisting things , no matter how obscure or vague .

DUM's are Leighton's Mouthpieces , he has them in every 2 months , for two years he did his upmost to turn them and "our people" against the CWU , like something out of Nuremborg Rallies those DIM meetings apparently .

Post by **TrueBlueTerrier** » 30 Jan 2008, 06:54

postyparker wrote:
Throgg wrote:Each question from your DOM should have the same answer from you

NO COMMENT

That way you can't incriminate yourself and your DOM can't try and twist anything you would have said to his advantage
You are a sad sad sad person.

http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/forum/rules.php

Rules you agreed to wrote:Please do not in any circumstances resort to name calling.

Post by **POSTMAN** » 30 Jan 2008, 14:58

postyparker wrote:
Throgg wrote:Each question from your DOM should have the same answer from you

NO COMMENT

That way you can't incriminate yourself and your DOM can't try and twist anything you would have said to his advantage
You are a sad sad sad person.

So,i presume you've started the job now,hows your DOM?

Throgg · Post by **Throgg** » 30 Jan 2008, 17:10

Throgg wrote:
Each question from your DOM should have the same answer from you

NO COMMENT

That way you can't incriminate yourself and your DOM can't try and twist anything you would have said to his advantage

You are a sad sad sad person.

I can only base my suggestion on personal experience. Having had a 1 to 1 with my DOM for a "helping to get you back to work interview", my DOM lied about what was said at that interview to other managers in our office.

I don't see how protecting yourself from lying DOMs makes you sad. Please enlighten me, oh wise one.

postyparker · Post by **postyparker** » 30 Jan 2008, 18:14

POSTMAN wrote:
postyparker wrote:
Throgg wrote:Each question from your DOM should have the same answer from you

NO COMMENT

That way you can't incriminate yourself and your DOM can't try and twist anything you would have said to his advantage
You are a sad sad sad person.
So,i presume you've started the job now,hows your DOM?

Yes I have. I know I'm going to get the you've opnly been there two minutes you know f*** all malarky but if your going to be like that with them, eg NO COMMENT surely people must wonder why DOM's 'pick' on them or get on better with other people. It's common sense. Again I don't know the individual person or the situation and forgive me if it is actually like living in a police station.

Mine is great, line manager sound as a pound. I might be lucky as our office (which I'm not naming) as iy's very laid back to what I've seen on here. This site actually put me off and I was bricking it but I love it. People just get on with it and have a laugh it's as simple as that.

Post by **POSTMAN** » 30 Jan 2008, 18:39

postyparker wrote:
POSTMAN wrote:
postyparker wrote:
Throgg wrote:Each question from your DOM should have the same answer from you

NO COMMENT

That way you can't incriminate yourself and your DOM can't try and twist anything you would have said to his advantage
You are a sad sad sad person.
So,i presume you've started the job now,hows your DOM?
Yes I have. I know I'm going to get the you've opnly been there two minutes you know f*** all malarky but if your going to be like that with them, eg NO COMMENT surely people must wonder why DOM's 'pick' on them or get on better with other people. It's common sense. Again I don't know the individual person or the situation and forgive me if it is actually like living in a police station.

Mine is great, line manager sound as a pound. I might be lucky as our office (which I'm not naming) as iy's very laid back to what I've seen on here. This site actually put me off and I was bricking it but I love it. People just get on with it and have a laugh it's as simple as that.

It's not all doom and gloom,and good to hear you've got a good office.
Personally mine is not too bad either,office or Managers,outside influences with higher up Management are not helping and have not helped at times.
But previous Managers have been a night mare.
We talk to our DOM and Lino a lot and they are as frustrated as us with certain things going on.
I don't think we'll be having the 1 to 1's down our way anyway.

I'm book marking this thread for future reference btw