dvbuk55 wrote:Yes you are indeed confused - you are referring to "summer saving" whereby 5 people cover 6 duties for the summer period because there is no mail - yet another wonder plan - and the CWU bods think it is OK.greynut wrote:Im confused.dvbuk55 wrote:Course it works - it works for them otherwise there would be no need to publicise how advantageous it is to have someone do your duty for nothing whilst you go for a hospital appointment, so that when they want a weeks holiday you do their job for nothing - yep it's a wonderful life in flexibility land - wonder if they'll be flexible enough to kiss my backside?k66yla wrote:Wish they were actors, one of those people in that leaflet covers the meal relief on one of my duties, when they are not at work other arrangements arn't made to cover them and we have to argue with a manager to get the meal relief covered. Flexibility works my A@@eSouth East Postie wrote:where do they get these actors from? boasting how good flexibility is and how great the job is. these are the same morons i see on our pointless plasma tv in the morning at work.
either they are actors or they really are insane, or more likely, are wild crabs.
I thought flexibilty was only implemeted through the summer months, through certain weeks. If its being implemeted now then thats not right is it? Or did I not read the small print or was I lied to by my DOM. I voted No by the way, before anyone accuses me of moaning too late.
5 into 6 is not agreed as such; just summer staffing. It should give some room for manoeuvre. Keep your copy of the 'pay and modernisation deal' handy at all times!
