I'm inclined to agree.ssdd wrote: ↑02 Oct 2021, 15:22So they've done this before. https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/co ... 63422.html
The difference is this time they're using our words as a tool to hold Simon accountable to the agreed promise of 400 revisions by November. For me it just highlights the fact there are entities that will use your words against you to further their own purposes.
This time, it's fuel for the fire to what was already decided in my opinion. The real cause is due to rising costs. https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/co ... 61671.html
To allude that the opinions on here are the cause of this decision, is twisting the narrative. Again, a tool with which to hold us to account, and to press on with the incessant drive for rapid transformation and profit.
It's obvious how much and where this company continues to hemorrhage money.
What i can't work out is if Simon is just bad at his job, or he just doesn't care as he knows he's powerless to change anything, and simply is buying his time until being kicked out. His portfolio isn't exactly good, so potentially the latter.