My lump sums are as follows from my ESTIMATE (not statement):-RobertT wrote:I can't disagree!freespeech wrote:I'm so pleased to be wrong as that helps my position a lot. However, it does further reinforce my point about pension estimates being a mess when you can't see the final position (inc AVC's and and cash balance impact) until you have signed to take your pension.
The DBCBS is 'attached' to the RMPP and so is mainly used to fund the lump sum associated with RMPP(2012-2018) benefits, plus a small amount of pre 2012 benefits which the RMPP are also responsible for paying. A point that's been mentioned on these forums several times before.So are you saying I can use all my £21k cash balance fund and all of my bonusplan/flexiplan AVC's of £10k to fund £31k of my LS for NRA60?
Any excess DBCBS cash, once the tax free element has been paid, will be available to you as a UFPLS, which means the first 25% of that excess will also be tax free, with the remainder coming under normal PAYE tax rules.
Going by your previous posts, I have a much smaller NRA60 pension than you and I expect to take a tax free lump sum of around £52,000 from my AVC's. So your £10,000 will be well within the 25% tax free limit.
IF you want a bigger lump sum, then that will be funded by commuting some of your pension, plus a relatively small amount of DBCBS as mentioned above.
That's a possibility, but payments into AVC's have to be done via payroll so you'll need to get in touch with them to ensure you can actually do what you propose.I also have a possible VR option and was thinking of putting £20k of that back into an AVC (rather than pay tax) so that is now £51k towards my NRA60 LS.
Another option might be to put your taxed amount into a personal pension, as you'll effectively get the tax back.
NRA60 RMPP £13,961 RMSPS £67,310
NRA65 RMPP £17,371 RMSPS £5,224
Cash balance fund is £21,767 Bonusplan is around £9k and Flexiplan around £1k. In addition a further £20 MAY go into flexiplan (through payroll) on VR. I'm still confused whether this total of nearly £52k can fund ALL of that amount tax free (it's about half of my total potential LS). The way I see it is that I have a pension figure with no LS and another at max LS. If the above will fund around half my LS then logic suggests I can take MAX LS and lose about half the difference between max pension and max LS (because the £52k is funding the other half of the LS). Is that a reasonable assumption?