OUT
I blame these two :lfo :cfo
I;m confused as to what you want to know mate. Is it the PEC members who voted for/against the deal or the breakdown of branches results? Or both?L Tommo wrote:It took 27 years for Nelson Mandella to get his justice of sorts....
So because the deal is done. Should we all just sit back and not find out the facts that SHOULD be availible for all.... So LJ you have info that gives you the breakdown of the vote....? WHY MENTION IT ON HERE UNLESS YOU ARE WILLING TO POST IT?>?>>?
I hope its not just a schoolboy prank and a one upmanship that you boast....???
If so then your a dirty tease.... You rotter!!!
I also want to move on but as BELIAL Said... But how shall we when people on the PEC /HQ voted for something when there was a blackout of newS agreed for the weeks leading up to the deal and then WHOLLOP "THIS IS THE DEAL AND ITS A GREAT CHANGE FROM BEFORE."
Personally i dont agree.. (No surprise there) But now we should demand the vote and voters on the PEC to step forward... As if you 9 agreed to it....?
STAND UP AND BE COUNTED. As you speak for us... So tell us what you said and how you felt it will benefit US REAL WORKERS????
OUT
The PEC vote is common knowledge? A previous thread named those who voted No (from Socialist worker i think), Obviously take those guys out plus John Farnan who was on leave and you have the members who voted yesL Tommo wrote:BOTH BUT THE PEC if you please Mr Lovers!!!! Thank you sir!!! Bow scrape...strangler wrote:Both please Mr Lovejoy![]()
TELL US OR I WILL COME ROUND WIV MY eX BIRD N SHE WILL CHEW YA EARS OFF YA GIT!!!![]()
out
Well if the PEC vote is common knowledge ,any chance of re posting it for us uncommon folks?lovejoy wrote:The PEC vote is common knowledge? A previous thread named those who voted No (from Socialist worker i think), Obviously take those guys out plus John Farnan who was on leave and you have the members who voted yesL Tommo wrote:BOTH BUT THE PEC if you please Mr Lovers!!!! Thank you sir!!! Bow scrape...strangler wrote:Both please Mr Lovejoy![]()
TELL US OR I WILL COME ROUND WIV MY eX BIRD N SHE WILL CHEW YA EARS OFF YA GIT!!!![]()
out
On the breakdown i'm not going to post it up if anyone wants to PM me and ask about their branch i'll pass on the info!
PM Sent. Thanks.lovejoy wrote:The PEC vote is common knowledge? A previous thread named those who voted No (from Socialist worker i think), Obviously take those guys out plus John Farnan who was on leave and you have the members who voted yesL Tommo wrote:BOTH BUT THE PEC if you please Mr Lovers!!!! Thank you sir!!! Bow scrape...strangler wrote:Both please Mr Lovejoy![]()
TELL US OR I WILL COME ROUND WIV MY eX BIRD N SHE WILL CHEW YA EARS OFF YA GIT!!!![]()
out
On the breakdown i'm not going to post it up if anyone wants to PM me and ask about their branch i'll pass on the info!
Lovejoy please post the voting information if you have it, unfortunatley that is one of the major problems with OUR union people in the know deciding wether its appropriate for us to get certain info, well in a democratic union ALL information should be availiable to ALL members!!! One of the dissapointing parts of the dispute was that the the union agreed to a privacy clause during the 5 week ceasefire, in reality that means that they were deciding OUR future behind closed doors, this should never be allowed to happen again!!!!BELIAL wrote:Well if the PEC vote is common knowledge ,any chance of re posting it for us uncommon folks?lovejoy wrote:The PEC vote is common knowledge? A previous thread named those who voted No (from Socialist worker i think), Obviously take those guys out plus John Farnan who was on leave and you have the members who voted yesL Tommo wrote:BOTH BUT THE PEC if you please Mr Lovers!!!! Thank you sir!!! Bow scrape...strangler wrote:Both please Mr Lovejoy![]()
TELL US OR I WILL COME ROUND WIV MY eX BIRD N SHE WILL CHEW YA EARS OFF YA GIT!!!![]()
out
On the breakdown i'm not going to post it up if anyone wants to PM me and ask about their branch i'll pass on the info!
On the breakdown ,whats the problem with going public? If it's suitable for one ,it's suitable for all, let's not exclude anyone.
Plus there is the rather sinister fact that since this dispute began I seem to have become on first name terms with RM's IB department,but I do carry out my role to the letter so no problem,however it is still intimidatory as intended.
So a public revelation would be appreciated, many thanks
Nope I hadn't noticedlinkinpark wrote:And yes you may have noticed that my hatred burns as hot and deep as ever.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()