BRANCHES VOTING NO

lovejoy · Post by **lovejoy** » 28 Nov 2007, 17:29

Out of all the branches who actually recommended a NO vote only 9 actually managed to achieve this.

Hopefully the full breakdown will be available soon!

curly1975 · Post by **curly1975** » 28 Nov 2007, 17:34

How long before this info will be available??

lovejoy · Post by **lovejoy** » 28 Nov 2007, 17:35

curly1975 wrote:How long before this info will be available??

not long i would have thought mate.

curly1975 · Post by **curly1975** » 28 Nov 2007, 17:43

That is going to be very interesting when it is released.

I am on sick at moment but will be logging into my Branch e mail from home in eager anticipation!!!!!

brothermagrew · Post by **brothermagrew** » 28 Nov 2007, 18:56

lovejoy wrote:Out of all the branches who actually recommended a NO vote only 9 actually managed to achieve this.

Hopefully the full breakdown will be available soon!

Pray tell brother lovejoy where one can illicit this information from?

paupuspaul · Post by **paupuspaul** » 28 Nov 2007, 20:04

brothermagrew wrote:
lovejoy wrote:Out of all the branches who actually recommended a NO vote only 9 actually managed to achieve this.

Hopefully the full breakdown will be available soon!
Pray tell
brother lovejoy where one can illicit this information from?

thought is was a secret ballot

BELIAL · Post by **BELIAL** » 28 Nov 2007, 20:15

BAR CODE

shankly · Post by **shankly** » 28 Nov 2007, 20:44

that information is never released could you imagine what the managers would do with it

Spedley · Post by **Spedley** » 28 Nov 2007, 20:53

I thought it was annonymous but I did note that my paper had a unique number on it.

It would appear that if they know what votes were cast in which offices I would expect they know excatly how people voted.

k979aaa · Post by **k979aaa** » 28 Nov 2007, 21:25

lovejoy wrote:Out of all the branches who actually recommended a NO vote only 9 actually managed to achieve this.

Hopefully the full breakdown will be available soon!

It has been quite hard to put any thing to say vote no on our union notice board for the management rip it of the board every time we put up a notice to vote no. There's democracy for you all.?

Night Tonic · Post by **Night Tonic** » 28 Nov 2007, 21:34

As I just said in another thread, democracy is part of politics - not business. If businesses were entirely democratic in the way they operated, they'd never make any money at all.

BELIAL · Post by **BELIAL** » 28 Nov 2007, 22:23

Night Tonic wrote:As I just said in another thread, democracy is part of politics - not business. If businesses were entirely democratic in the way they operated, they'd never make any money at all.

So true ,time to disabuse yourselves comrades ,but it's not as good as it sounds

rathbonepostie · Post by **rathbonepostie** » 30 Nov 2007, 19:36

Any info on branches where committee recommended a Yes" and the mebers voted no?

blackadder · Post by **blackadder** » 30 Nov 2007, 20:14

no such thing as a secret ballot. all voting papers have a unique number on them weather thats union or govenment. big brother knows all

BELIAL · Post by **BELIAL** » 30 Nov 2007, 21:11

OOh then it is possible to to provide a relevant office by office breakdown ,which with very little imagination could be verified, or not .
I look forward to the figures being published

ROYALMAILCHAT

BRANCHES VOTING NO

BRANCHES VOTING NO

Re: BRANCHES VOTING NO

Re: BRANCHES VOTING NO

Re: BRANCHES VOTING NO

branches voting no