ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

IT'S A YES VOTE

Latest Royal Mail and CWU news.This is an open forum.
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Post by Big Daz »

tyconuk wrote:And i am one of the 28000 NO voters!!!!!!
Tesco's here i come!

Are you going to join USDAW ?
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Post by Big Daz »

disgruntledpostie1 wrote:Well I hope all you people who voted YES enjoy it whenever you are working extra for nothing and whenever you go in to work in the morning and find yourself moved to a vacant duty because you have agreed to be flexible (I only say that because it's what I'm doing now and it's really disheartening to worry about what duty you are going to be on when you go in), and for those MC staff who voted yes I hope you enjoy being sent out to DO's up and down the country doing all the deliveries that will not be done.

I hope the Billy, Dave and Gordon are happy with the result, I for one will be putting serious thought into coming out of the union, at least that way I'll not feel so sold out the next time the union want our help (and an extra £3/week in my wages).

I couldnt give a flying monkeys what delivery im on, a 40 hour week is a 40 hour week and thats protected in the aggrement.
nobodies hero
Posts: 23
Joined: 04 Oct 2007, 20:00

Post by nobodies hero »

What the hell !! i work with 1900 posties in wolves and i have asked loads what they voted, they all said they voted NO !!

Is it a rigged vote ffs !!
blackadder
Posts: 584
Joined: 04 Jul 2007, 20:49
Location: deep south

Post by blackadder »

im looking for another job, maybe i find one that will accept my hidden talents like pushing trollys at asdas lol. seriously girls, things aint gonna be the same again in this job. shame realy cos i used to love the job
the path of my life is strewn with cowpats from the devils own satanic herd
UNION JACK
Posts: 247
Joined: 03 Jun 2007, 20:26

BIG DAZ

Post by UNION JACK »

Its a 40 hour week over a twelve week period meaning you can do 30 hours for six weeks and a 50 hours a week for the other six the bastards have got us.
lovejoy
Posts: 1255
Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 12:59

Re: BIG DAZ

Post by lovejoy »

UNION JACK wrote:Its a 40 hour week over a twelve week period meaning you can do 30 hours for six weeks and a 50 hours a week for the other six the bastards have got us.
Where did you get that from?
UNION JACK
Posts: 247
Joined: 03 Jun 2007, 20:26

lovejoy

Post by UNION JACK »

Look it up ,i think its in the euro laws on the 40 hour working week.I thought you would of realised this.
lovejoy
Posts: 1255
Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 12:59

Re: lovejoy

Post by lovejoy »

UNION JACK wrote:Look it up ,i think its in the euro laws on the 40 hour working week.I thought you would of realised this.
what the hell have euro laws got to do with our national agreements.

Read the agreement mate. 40 hr week will not change!!! :shock:
kill Joy
Posts: 52
Joined: 05 Nov 2007, 18:34

Post by kill Joy »

BELIAL wrote:
Ricky Bruch wrote:Well the way I feel at the moment I`m resigning as sub rep.

I`m not prepared to support p!ss weak willed scumbags who can`t see further than the bottom of their wallets....

A sad sad day...BLACK TUESDAY...................

I can just see all the propaganda bullsh!t being rolled out over the next 2 or 3 days from :lfo & :cfo not to mention Billy 20 bellies & Co.............

As I sit here I`m really tempted to just throw in the towel with the union and save my 50-60 quid a year and go it alone, quite capable of fighting my own battles against the Dums.............
I don't think you are alone. On a purely personal note, in my DO the rep and his no.2 have already stated their intention to pack in their membership given this outcome. They did this to allow any possible replacements time to sus out the role, there were no takers. A sad day but it does appear that our office will become non-union, bet it's not the only one.
With such defeatism in your office it is little wonder there'll be no one brave enough to take on the job. I assumed, wrongly, you held a reps position. Whilst I disagree with a large amount of what you say and the way you say it, at least you have something to say!!! Looks like you should give the Reps job a go but I suggest you leave the more colorful language for the pub - second thoughts probably best to bite your lip. So, are you up for it?
UNION JACK
Posts: 247
Joined: 03 Jun 2007, 20:26

lovejoy

Post by UNION JACK »

Since when have agreements meant anything to Royal Mail were all doomed and you know it.The strenght of the union has gone Royal Mail will do what they want and neither you or i will change that and if anyone out here doesn't like that fact get another job.
lovejoy
Posts: 1255
Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 12:59

Re: lovejoy

Post by lovejoy »

UNION JACK wrote:Since when have agreements meant anything to Royal Mail were all doomed and you know it.The strenght of the union has gone Royal Mail will do what they want and neither you or i will change that and if anyone out here doesn't like that fact get another job.
Right ok then! So you basically accept the fact that you made up the flexible week thing on the premise that Royal Mail will do what they want.

They will only do that if people like you stand by and let it happen.

Its nothing to do with reps! its YOUR actions that will determine where we go from here. Lets hope your not all mouth!!! :chuckle
k979aaa
Posts: 12578
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

Re: lovejoy

Post by k979aaa »

lovejoy wrote:
UNION JACK wrote:Look it up ,i think its in the euro laws on the 40 hour working week.I thought you would of realised this.
what the hell have euro laws got to do with our national agreements.

Read the agreement mate. 40 hr week will not change!!! :shock:
PHASE 4 :JOINT WORKING GROUP 2: "THE GROUP WILL ALSO CONSIDER HOW TO IMPLEMENT MONTHLY PAY. IT WILL ALSO REVIEW ANNUALISED HOURS OR BANKED HOURS" IT SOUNDS TO ME THIS FAILED AGREEMENT HAS ALREADY CONCEDED THIS AND MENY OTHER THING'S FOR WANT OF A BETTER WORD SHAFTED!. :evil/mad
lovejoy
Posts: 1255
Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 12:59

Re: lovejoy

Post by lovejoy »

k979aaa wrote:
lovejoy wrote:
UNION JACK wrote:Look it up ,i think its in the euro laws on the 40 hour working week.I thought you would of realised this.
what the hell have euro laws got to do with our national agreements.

Read the agreement mate. 40 hr week will not change!!! :shock:
PHASE 4 :JOINT WORKING GROUP 2: "THE GROUP WILL ALSO CONSIDER HOW TO IMPLEMENT MONTHLY PAY. IT WILL ALSO REVIEW ANNUALISED HOURS OR BANKED HOURS" IT SOUNDS TO ME THIS FAILED AGREEMENT HAS ALREADY CONCEDED THIS AND MENY OTHER THING'S FOR WANT OF A BETTER WORD SHAFTED!. :evil/mad
Reviewing annualised hours doesn't mean its been conceded! Maybe its time to move away from attacking the agreement. Now the vote has been cast we ALL have this as part of our terms and conditions.

Our efforts should be spent on making the best of this situation and sharing best practices
UNION JACK
Posts: 247
Joined: 03 Jun 2007, 20:26

lovejoy

Post by UNION JACK »

I will do as they say ,they are my boss and pay my wages i owe it to them to work whatever hours they want iam a robot . :wave :wave
lovejoy
Posts: 1255
Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 12:59

Re: lovejoy

Post by lovejoy »

UNION JACK wrote:I will do as they say ,they are my boss and pay my wages i owe it to them to work whatever hours they want iam a robot . :wave :wave
I take it you'll avoid the question about you making a stand then and as usual leave it to others?? Just about sums it up