That's not the law. There are a number of exceptions. Two of which are relevant to RM.
2: driving a goods vehicle on deliveries that is travelling no more than 50 metres between stops
I truly cannot believe somebody has chosen to post this again.
Which bit of "RM policy is you wear your seat belt at all times" is difficult to understand?
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
That's not the law. There are a number of exceptions. Two of which are relevant to RM.
2: driving a goods vehicle on deliveries that is travelling no more than 50 metres between stops
I truly cannot believe somebody has chosen to post this again.
Which bit of "RM policy is you wear your seat belt at all times" is difficult to understand?
Ciderboy1957 wrote:Gents , I took my pension few years back , ie lump sum and monthly payment , if I get sacked can Royal Mail attempt to stop monthly payment
That's not the law. There are a number of exceptions. Two of which are relevant to RM.
2: driving a goods vehicle on deliveries that is travelling no more than 50 metres between stops
I truly cannot believe somebody has chosen to post this again.
Which bit of "RM policy is you wear your seat belt at all times" is difficult to understand?
Learn to read what i wrote in context, might improve your reading comprehension, and understanding.
I was specifically replying to a poster that said "it's the law". I was pointing out what the law actually is... and thus the "it's the law argument, doesn't add much to the conversation.
clashcityrocker wrote:You wrote:
Two of which are relevant to RM.
How exactly is it relevant to RM?
Because I was cherry picking from a number of exceptions. And the others are clearly not related in any way shape or form. So that was a comment on omission, as opposed to a comment on our policy.
Any leap you've made to think I've conflated the law with RM policy, was yours not mine. I was merely pointing out the law does not consider those to be offences, thus, "it's the law" argument doesn't hold any ground.
clashcityrocker wrote:
There are actually rules to posting on this forum.
I would suggest you have a little read of them.
Can't be the first time you've been called an idiot on here eh. lol
But it's perfectly fine for him to call what you have written bullshit. Of which, it wasn't. The hypocrisy on this forum is laughable at times.
Locked thread because it went off topic.
But to clarify for those that missed the context.
I have never heard such Bullshit on here - is a comment and an opinion on a post, it may be borderline but it did not cross the line and break the rules, in my opinion.
Laughing at someone (lol) when calling them an "Idiot", and also calling them dense, is not an opinion on a post or position, it's quite simply behaviour that can be called Bullying and harassment, or a personal attack.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts. Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility. If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
