Ballot Paper

L Tommo · Post by **L Tommo** » 13 Nov 2007, 20:31

Lovejoy i stand corrected... 9-5 n 3 officers.... Im just so fecking mad at the ballot paper... I know ive seen it before but it just got me....

ANYWAY WOT A GUTTLESS BUNCH OF BASTARDS!!!

lovejoy · Post by **lovejoy** » 13 Nov 2007, 20:32

L Tommo wrote:Lovejoy i stand corrected... 9-5 n 3 officers.... Im just so fecking mad at the ballot paper... I know ive seen it before but it just got me....

ANYWAY WOT A GUTTLESS BUNCH OF BASTARDS!!!

I know mate, its an emotive subject. I don't understand the drifters and the 'i probably wonn't vote brigade'

IDIOTS!!

L Tommo · Post by **L Tommo** » 13 Nov 2007, 20:41

lovejoy wrote:
L Tommo wrote:Moon mate.. I know that other ballot papers have had a line from the PEC or branch.. But With this vote so cut in two as in reality its 6-5 in favour and the other three just aint backing it but have been very slippery about the towing the party line or billy n daves party line...

I cant help feel its just wrong... So what about the 5 who dont think its a good deal and said NO....?? And the closeness of the TRUE vote Not some sham backsliding vote is No a majorty of any sorts in my book... There has been all under hand goings on in my opinion...

RM have pushed the right buttons and the PEC have split themselves in two..... RM must be larfing at us now......

w*****s... Lets see wot kind of post billy n dave get when we are just a speck in the past and RM is totally Business run and on the stock exchange???? Lord Billy of scouseland and Sir Dave of West London...????

FECK THE PAIR OF EM... But for now i want to see these two bastards out on there earhole.... :cfo :lfo

We will deal with billy bullshiter n dave dicksplash later... Time will tell....

OUT
Ha its not 6-5

it was 9-5 and the officers were on top of that!!

Officers are not PEC members and would not have voted

Lovejoy..... Why the "HA" in the comment???? It sounds very snotty and one up manship... I admit when im wrong and stand the flack i deserve... Shame some on here and in all of our offices dont do the same... LIVE BY THE SWORD N ALL THAT...

OUT

PS the rest of your point is correct... But leave the sarki comment out....

lovejoy · Post by **lovejoy** » 13 Nov 2007, 20:43

L Tommo wrote:
lovejoy wrote:
L Tommo wrote:Moon mate.. I know that other ballot papers have had a line from the PEC or branch.. But With this vote so cut in two as in reality its 6-5 in favour and the other three just aint backing it but have been very slippery about the towing the party line or billy n daves party line...

I cant help feel its just wrong... So what about the 5 who dont think its a good deal and said NO....?? And the closeness of the TRUE vote Not some sham backsliding vote is No a majorty of any sorts in my book... There has been all under hand goings on in my opinion...

RM have pushed the right buttons and the PEC have split themselves in two..... RM must be larfing at us now......

w*****s... Lets see wot kind of post billy n dave get when we are just a speck in the past and RM is totally Business run and on the stock exchange???? Lord Billy of scouseland and Sir Dave of West London...????

FECK THE PAIR OF EM... But for now i want to see these two bastards out on there earhole.... :cfo :lfo

We will deal with billy bullshiter n dave dicksplash later... Time will tell....

OUT
Ha its not 6-5

it was 9-5 and the officers were on top of that!!

Officers are not PEC members and would not have voted

Lovejoy..... Why the "HA" in the comment???? It sounds very snotty and one up manship... I admit when im wrong and stand the flack i deserve... Shame some on here and in all of our offices dont do the same... LIVE BY THE SWORD N ALL THAT...

OUT

PS the rest of your point is correct... But leave the sarki comment out....

I wasn't being sarcastic i was laughing at what you had posted about Hayes and Ward mate!!

L Tommo · Post by **L Tommo** » 13 Nov 2007, 20:45

Ok Lovejoy... We have both had our say... Leave it there...

OUT :lfo :cfo

Post by **moon71** » 13 Nov 2007, 20:51

OK, ive seen the confrontational attitude from the management from the strikes, ive been informed as to whats happening around the country from this site, but heres a question for all the no voters....
You get the no vote, say 60%, what do you realy hope the CWU negotiation team to do then? Wanna work to rule for another year, 8 more days strike? An enforced paydeal, i realy dont know what more people want an expect from the CWU.
Me, im allright jack, i can vote no, i got savings, a house, sorry to rub it in, but realy, but what i cant face is the scab count doubling. I'd love to work in Liverpool or London, proud of you folks, but i see this deal coming in.
The management are probably hoping for a no vote anyway, from what i see, its win win with them bastards. Wheres the extra pay coming from i ask myself, well the 8 days they saved from many of us, and probably more stolen from our pension or the jobs there cutting.