Pay offs

[Acca Dacca]

What happens to his partner if he is a non driver?

Presumably he'll be able to pick any non-driving vacant duty. Or become a reserve. It's what happened to duty holders whose jobs were lapsed almost permanently. I suppose the duty changes might be significant enough to trigger a resign, but I can't imagine RM wanting that upheaval.

No mights about it - it'd have to

I was led to believe that 33% of the office had to change to trigger a resign.

If every duty was absobring the 1 in 6 then every duty would have changed

[Marshamp11]

Pay off line managers waste of money.

See the shares shoot up in price.

Would save the company millions if they got rid off then or make them part time.

It goes without saying that if the workforce takes a cut you dont need as many managers to manage whats left.

[Marshamp11]

What happens to his partner if he is a non driver?

Presumably he'll be able to pick any non-driving vacant duty. Or become a reserve. It's what happened to duty holders whose jobs were lapsed almost permanently. I suppose the duty changes might be significant enough to trigger a resign, but I can't imagine RM wanting that upheaval.

No mights about it - it'd have to

I was led to believe that 33% of the office had to change to trigger a resign.

If every duty was absobring the 1 in 6 then every duty would have changed

Only by 16%. Thats 1/6th. Doesnt matter that its spread across all duties its the office total.

[Acca Dacca]

What happens to his partner if he is a non driver?

Presumably he'll be able to pick any non-driving vacant duty. Or become a reserve. It's what happened to duty holders whose jobs were lapsed almost permanently. I suppose the duty changes might be significant enough to trigger a resign, but I can't imagine RM wanting that upheaval.

No mights about it - it'd have to

I was led to believe that 33% of the office had to change to trigger a resign.

If every duty was absobring the 1 in 6 then every duty would have changed

Only by 16%. Thats 1/6th. Doesnt matter that its spread across all duties its the office total.

But every duty would then be altered as they would be taking on the extra bit and therefore be changed

[Marshamp11]

What happens to his partner if he is a non driver?

Presumably he'll be able to pick any non-driving vacant duty. Or become a reserve. It's what happened to duty holders whose jobs were lapsed almost permanently. I suppose the duty changes might be significant enough to trigger a resign, but I can't imagine RM wanting that upheaval.

No mights about it - it'd have to

I was led to believe that 33% of the office had to change to trigger a resign.

If every duty was absobring the 1 in 6 then every duty would have changed

Only by 16%. Thats 1/6th. Doesnt matter that its spread across all duties its the office total.

But every duty would then be altered as they would be taking on the extra bit and therefore be changed

RM could argue that the 'extra bit' is just replacing the oversize parcels that have been taken away.

[Acca Dacca]

What happens to his partner if he is a non driver?

Presumably he'll be able to pick any non-driving vacant duty. Or become a reserve. It's what happened to duty holders whose jobs were lapsed almost permanently. I suppose the duty changes might be significant enough to trigger a resign, but I can't imagine RM wanting that upheaval.

No mights about it - it'd have to

I was led to believe that 33% of the office had to change to trigger a resign.

If every duty was absobring the 1 in 6 then every duty would have changed

Only by 16%. Thats 1/6th. Doesnt matter that its spread across all duties its the office total.

But every duty would then be altered as they would be taking on the extra bit and therefore be changed

RM could argue that the 'extra bit' is just replacing the oversize parcels that have been taken away.

its still a change