ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

FINAL AGREEMENT:THE POLL

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.

WHAT WAY WILL YOU BE VOTING:THE FINAL AGREEMENT.

YES:FOR THE DEAL.
150
19%
NO:REJECT THE DEAL.
621
81%
 
Total votes: 771

maccy
Posts: 3
Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 19:36

Re: pay and moderniation deal

Post by maccy »

earlyrisera wrote:
earlyrisera wrote:
bigsharkboy wrote:one of the strike breakers during one of the early morning discussions on thursday actually said that mr crozier was worth every penny


give me fecking strength were do RM find these numbnuts is it part of the job interview process to show how brown your tongue is

:cfo :cfo :cfo :cfo :cfo :cfo :cfo :cfo :cfo
strike breakers we have a non union member in our office on a temp contract who comes in nearly 2 hrs later, he's sort are f***ing proper posties over, and he uses his car for drlivery, which the DOM knows about ! isn't using your car a dismissable offence? well it would be for a proper 40 hr a week full contract postie! but not them tossers
sorry meant 2 hrs early than he's start time,
does it appear to anyone else that the strike breakers get away with everything? we have one who comes in late does little or no sorting, uses his car (which is parked in the yard) to take all his bags out, he then runs round and goes back to the office to gloat about the fact he has made time. we got told that if we keep complaning about him we will get a harrasement against us. total joke
thexxxpostman
Posts: 45
Joined: 03 Nov 2007, 22:49

Post by thexxxpostman »

why did the executive sanction this terrible deal ??? just doesnt make any sense ..madness...vote no
earlyrisera
Posts: 13
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 19:35

Post by earlyrisera »

thexxxpostman wrote:why did the executive sanction this terrible deal ??? just doesnt make any sense ..madness...vote no
only Ward and Hayes did, the others won't put their name to it, it's that bad!
JJ
Posts: 8
Joined: 05 Jul 2007, 18:55
Location: cornwall

Post by JJ »

I must firstly say that I am not overwhelmed by the deal. I have been out on the line for all the previous strikes and I will continue to support the union what ever the forthcoming ballot result. I am concerned however if a NO vote is returned, where will that leave us the posties? I believe that if a no vote is returned then there will be no more 1 or 2 day strikes. We will be out for good until it is settled one way or another. I will admit that I do not want to be out on the streets over Xmas and I am affraid that we will lose public support if we are out over this period. I will stand on the line again if that is what it takes and I hope that whatever the majority decides, they can stand by the consequences.
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Post by BELIAL »

I believe we continue the rolling action. Effective; for RM expensive, and sustainable
davidessex
Posts: 119
Joined: 19 Oct 2007, 15:10

Post by davidessex »

JJ wrote:I must firstly say that I am not overwhelmed by the deal. I have been out on the line for all the previous strikes and I will continue to support the union what ever the forthcoming ballot result. I am concerned however if a NO vote is returned, where will that leave us the posties? I believe that if a no vote is returned then there will be no more 1 or 2 day strikes. We will be out for good until it is settled one way or another. I will admit that I do not want to be out on the streets over Xmas and I am affraid that we will lose public support if we are out over this period. I will stand on the line again if that is what it takes and I hope that whatever the majority decides, they can stand by the consequences.
the point is we vote no AND tell hayes ect what sort of action WE want to take. time they represented US not us representing THEM ok
shades
Posts: 42
Joined: 04 Nov 2007, 18:41

pay deal

Post by shades »

In 1971 we went on strike for seven weeks I couldnt afford to do it but I did I was in queer street for about a year paying back all the money I had to borrow,to keep my wife and kids in food and pay house rent.
I would do it all again to avoid this shambles of a deal that this so called union are hoping we will accept.
I for one will be votjng no
KawasakiKid
Posts: 436
Joined: 27 Jan 2007, 17:36
Location: Stoke area

Re: pay deal

Post by KawasakiKid »

shades wrote:In 1971 we went on strike for seven weeks I couldnt afford to do it but I did I was in queer street for about a year paying back all the money I had to borrow,to keep my wife and kids in food and pay house rent.
I would do it all again to avoid this shambles of a deal that this so called union are hoping we will accept.
I for one will be votjng no
:lfo :cfo shades mate, you've got to be long in the tooth and big in the heart. I hope some of the younger people can match your guts!!!!!!!!!!-------------A KOMRADELY KWAK FOR SHADES :wave :wave
--------------------
SilverSurferBiker
I'm one of the 77%
drb
Posts: 1044
Joined: 30 Jan 2007, 21:44
Gender: Male

Post by drb »

No to this deal
AnnoyedPerson
Posts: 23
Joined: 06 Nov 2007, 17:24

Post by AnnoyedPerson »

What IS the deal?

Why cant you just get a job somewhere else.. you can see that working for Royal Mail is getting you nowhere :?
L Tommo
Posts: 3165
Joined: 06 Feb 2007, 09:43
Gender: Male
Location: WATCHING YOU WATCHING ME!

Post by L Tommo »

Mr Annoyed.... For a start... We WHO VOTED FOR A STRIKE AND THAT WAS 77% and more want to save this SERVICE and RM in my opinion only want to make it into a business where WE ALL will pay more and get less of a service....

We want to give the public the best as we always have done for over 360 years....

The strings and terms that are attatched to the deal is a MASSIVE issue which i for one cant agree to... Lots of people on here and in Mail centers and Delivery offices feel the same all over the countrys....


OUT


I HOPE YOU SPEND TIME AND READ THE POSTS ON THIS SITE AND GET A FULL ROUNDED OPINION OF ALL THE FACTS NOT..... NOT JUST RM AND THE MEDIA WHO ARE RUN BY Big Allan Lie-ghton and murdoch..... All matey and good parasitical friends!!!


thanks.... :wave
L TOMMO.... ILLEGITIMIS NON CARBORUNDUM........

EAST LONDON MAIL CENTER-ISHHHH
AnnoyedPerson
Posts: 23
Joined: 06 Nov 2007, 17:24

Post by AnnoyedPerson »

Ok, calm down =\

Im just annoyed because its been almost 3 weeks since i sent something 1st class. It hasnt got there. Thats why im AnnoyedPerson :)
South East Postie
Posts: 154
Joined: 14 May 2007, 13:25
Gender: Male

Post by South East Postie »

AnnoyedPerson wrote:Ok, calm down =\

Im just annoyed because its been almost 3 weeks since i sent something 1st class. It hasnt got there. Thats why im AnnoyedPerson :)
did u write the address on it?
AnnoyedPerson
Posts: 23
Joined: 06 Nov 2007, 17:24

Post by AnnoyedPerson »

Nooooo... Im that stupid, really.
L Tommo
Posts: 3165
Joined: 06 Feb 2007, 09:43
Gender: Male
Location: WATCHING YOU WATCHING ME!

Post by L Tommo »

Oi who u telling to calm down>?>>? Im calm mate....... :angel

Now IF you wanna take my advice then well be it..?? If you dont......

ADIOS....

No skin off my nose!! ;liar


Look aroud you will see the reasons The majority on here DONT think its a good deal because RM and the CWU HQ have turned us over and gave us such a bad deal it would be the end of RM as we all know it,...


WE ARE PUBLIC USERS TO YOU KNOW,.,

CALM.......... :cuppa
L TOMMO.... ILLEGITIMIS NON CARBORUNDUM........

EAST LONDON MAIL CENTER-ISHHHH