voluntary redundancy and 104 weeks

Martin Walsh · Post by **Martin Walsh** » 28 Feb 2018, 11:26

There is no changed to MTSF within this agreement.

clashcityrocker · Post by **clashcityrocker** » 28 Feb 2018, 12:04

dingo wrote:There is no changed to MTSF within this agreement.

I hate to read between the lines but dos that mean - "but there will be in another agreement"?
And it still doesn't explain about "enhanced" payments on p.12.

daveyeff · Post by **daveyeff** » 28 Feb 2018, 13:36

this is the very answer that people have been going on about though Dingo. its VERY misleading!! our area rep has said exactly the same thing. is the MTSF 'GOING' to change once this agreement gets voted in and ratified? or is it going to stay as it is? because the wording as you will no doubt be very aware of on p.12 paints a very different picture. it IS stating that they will NO LONGER PAY augmented (made bigger) payments for REDUNDANCIES and IHR. meaning that future payments for redundancies and IHR will be paid at the standard (piss poor) rate. are you saying the wording is wrong? we've misunderstood? its been misquoted? or they are lying? please clarify and put all our minds at rest. until I get confirmation on this issue I know that i'm voting no!!

Binsey · Post by **Binsey** » 28 Feb 2018, 14:51

daveyeff wrote:this is the very answer that people have been going on about though Dingo. its VERY misleading!! our area rep has said exactly the same thing. is the MTSF 'GOING' to change once this agreement gets voted in and ratified? or is it going to stay as it is? because the wording as you will no doubt be very aware of on p.12 paints a very different picture. it IS stating that they will NO LONGER PAY augmented (made bigger) payments for REDUNDANCIES and IHR. meaning that future payments for redundancies and IHR will be paid at the standard (piss poor) rate. are you saying the wording is wrong? we've misunderstood? its been misquoted? or they are lying? please clarify and put all our minds at rest. until I get confirmation on this issue I know that i'm voting no!!

I suspect I know how RM and the Courts will interpret it!

Really hope I am wrong on this.

Martin Walsh · Post by **Martin Walsh** » 28 Feb 2018, 18:57

MTSF was not discussed within the talks.

There has not been any significant changes to MTSF since 2003 and the CWU will fight to keep MTSF.

There are no planned talks on MTSF.

jimt81 · Post by **jimt81** » 28 Feb 2018, 19:15

Thank you for clarifing that Dingo

daveyeff · Post by **daveyeff** » 01 Mar 2018, 14:03

thank you Dingo, I have also received confirmation from HQ.

Post by **petercostello** » 05 Feb 2019, 16:37

As far as I know it's still 104 weeks my union rep has stopped our office getting any vrs so he can get his schedule attendance. I work for distribution .