ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Royal Mail chief pockets £1.1m as profits dive
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72594
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Royal Mail chief pockets £1.1m as profits dive
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/b ... 779638.ece
Chief executive, Adam Crozier, is awarded a bonus of £500,0000 as Royal Mail's profits fall by more than a third
Dearbail Jordan
Royal Mail's chief executive, Adam Crozier, has been awarded £1.12 million in pay and bonuses as the strike-ridden UK postal service reported a 34.3 per cent fall in profits as a result of increasing pension costs.
The group also revealed today it only expects to break even in the current financial year because of funding its company pension plan, increased investment and falling postal volumes.
Mr Crozier, who was criticised during the recent postal crisis for allegedly failing to attend talks with unions, was paid a basic £633,000 as well as a £469,000 performance-related bonus, some of which has been deferred into a long-term incentive scheme. With £18,000 in benefits, Mr Crozier was rewarded a total £1.12 million.
Allan Leighton, non-executive chairman at Royal Mail, who recruited Mr Crozier in 2003, was paid a performance-related bonus of £200,000 on top of £20,000 in basic pay.
Royal Mail announced today that full-year operating profits had fallen from £355 million last year to £233 million, mainly because of a £193 million increase in pension funding costs to £722 million, as well as rising competition from other forms of communications and falling postal volumes.
The group admitted that the same competition and volume factors had impacted current trading, with profits down by £78 million in the first five months of the financial year.
Royal Mail said today: "Key issues for the company as we move forward are the continuing high cost of funding the pension scheme, the continuing decline in volumes as customers move to other forms of communication and the beginning of the huge investment we will now make in the modernisation of the company.
"All these factors combined mean that this year and next we expect to be operating at around break even."
Chief executive, Adam Crozier, is awarded a bonus of £500,0000 as Royal Mail's profits fall by more than a third
Dearbail Jordan
Royal Mail's chief executive, Adam Crozier, has been awarded £1.12 million in pay and bonuses as the strike-ridden UK postal service reported a 34.3 per cent fall in profits as a result of increasing pension costs.
The group also revealed today it only expects to break even in the current financial year because of funding its company pension plan, increased investment and falling postal volumes.
Mr Crozier, who was criticised during the recent postal crisis for allegedly failing to attend talks with unions, was paid a basic £633,000 as well as a £469,000 performance-related bonus, some of which has been deferred into a long-term incentive scheme. With £18,000 in benefits, Mr Crozier was rewarded a total £1.12 million.
Allan Leighton, non-executive chairman at Royal Mail, who recruited Mr Crozier in 2003, was paid a performance-related bonus of £200,000 on top of £20,000 in basic pay.
Royal Mail announced today that full-year operating profits had fallen from £355 million last year to £233 million, mainly because of a £193 million increase in pension funding costs to £722 million, as well as rising competition from other forms of communications and falling postal volumes.
The group admitted that the same competition and volume factors had impacted current trading, with profits down by £78 million in the first five months of the financial year.
Royal Mail said today: "Key issues for the company as we move forward are the continuing high cost of funding the pension scheme, the continuing decline in volumes as customers move to other forms of communication and the beginning of the huge investment we will now make in the modernisation of the company.
"All these factors combined mean that this year and next we expect to be operating at around break even."
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
IWW Fellow Worker
- Posts: 3644
- Joined: 30 May 2007, 14:27
- Gender: Male
-
strangler
- Posts: 441
- Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 15:43
-
Malatesta1954
- Posts: 74
- Joined: 03 Jun 2007, 17:43
Shouldn't these figures have been out months ago. Oh silly me, then they were then telling us there was no more money. Yet now we have Leighton receiving 1000 (yes 1 thousand) % bonus. Didn't Gordan Broon say that anything more than 2.5% in the public sector would lead to increased inflation. Then again when has Broon ever applied restraint to the bosses.
Same as any previous Labour Government they end up attacking the workers that elected them.

Same as any previous Labour Government they end up attacking the workers that elected them.

OPG London W1
-
Spartacus
- Posts: 533
- Joined: 23 Jun 2007, 16:41
- Location: Wales
Am I reading this right?
Does this mean that the RM made £233 million profit and contributed £193 million to the pension fund?
Does that mean that without the pension deficit profits would have been £426 million?
Or is that a simplistic approach?
:cfo
:cfo
:cfo
:cfo
:cfo
Royal Mail announced today that full-year operating profits had fallen from £355 million last year to £233 million, mainly because of a £193 million increase in pension funding costs to £722 million, as well as rising competition from other forms of communications and falling postal volumes.
Does this mean that the RM made £233 million profit and contributed £193 million to the pension fund?
Does that mean that without the pension deficit profits would have been £426 million?
Or is that a simplistic approach?
:cfo
:cfo
:cfo
:cfo
:cfo
Delivery
Resistance is fertile
Resistance is fertile
-
Stormproof
- Posts: 6116
- Joined: 07 Jul 2007, 21:03
- Gender: Female
Profits will be even less next year due to the amount of money they are blowing at the mo, vehicle telemetry, fans & lights above the frames, vans(virtually all our vans have been replaced by the new crew buses), changing the hi-vis jackets to name a few, I'm sure the list is endless.
Of course they will blame the strikes for not making a profit
Of course they will blame the strikes for not making a profit
So keep on moving, moving, moving your feet
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets
Illegitimi non carborundum
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets
Illegitimi non carborundum
-
strangler
- Posts: 441
- Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 15:43
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Actually I'm glad they've announced the true profits. They said it had made a 12 Million loss - we all knew they were lying but the Government refused to make them reveal the true operating figures rather than those legally bound to be revealed to Postcomm.strangler wrote:And you can bet your ass they will release the full figures for next year ASAP so they can blame the strikes for losing them money.
It just points out the duplicity these people employ. How long will it be before the executive action is back in the guise of flexibility and cooperation.
-
Stormproof
- Posts: 6116
- Joined: 07 Jul 2007, 21:03
- Gender: Female
CWU site
31 October 2007
CWU response to Royal Mail’s financial results
Royal Mail’s profits are disappointing and come as a direct result of mismanagement, Postcomm’s irresponsible decisions, and unfair competition.
Billy Hayes, General Secretary, said: “The CWU has consistently called for a government review on the impact of competition on postal services. In light of these results we now repeat that call for an urgent review.â€
CWU response to Royal Mail’s financial results
Royal Mail’s profits are disappointing and come as a direct result of mismanagement, Postcomm’s irresponsible decisions, and unfair competition.
Billy Hayes, General Secretary, said: “The CWU has consistently called for a government review on the impact of competition on postal services. In light of these results we now repeat that call for an urgent review.â€
So keep on moving, moving, moving your feet
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets
Illegitimi non carborundum
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets
Illegitimi non carborundum
-
Albethere
- Posts: 76
- Joined: 20 Aug 2007, 14:50
- Location: North of the Midlands
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU site
[quote="k66yla"]31 October 2007
CWU response to Royal Mail’s financial results
Royal Mail’s profits are disappointing and come as a direct result of mismanagement, Postcomm’s irresponsible decisions, and unfair competition.
Billy Hayes, General Secretary, said: “The CWU has consistently called for a government review on the impact of competition on postal services. In light of these results we now repeat that call for an urgent review.â€
CWU response to Royal Mail’s financial results
Royal Mail’s profits are disappointing and come as a direct result of mismanagement, Postcomm’s irresponsible decisions, and unfair competition.
Billy Hayes, General Secretary, said: “The CWU has consistently called for a government review on the impact of competition on postal services. In light of these results we now repeat that call for an urgent review.â€
-
mdtomuk
- Posts: 315
- Joined: 14 May 2007, 19:02
- Location: BH (Bournemouth/Poole)
-
djsquires
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 20:06
-
Malatesta1954
- Posts: 74
- Joined: 03 Jun 2007, 17:43
Re: CWU site
[quote="dvbuk55"][quote="k66yla"]31 October 2007
CWU response to Royal Mail’s financial results
Royal Mail’s profits are disappointing and come as a direct result of mismanagement, Postcomm’s irresponsible decisions, and unfair competition.
Billy Hayes, General Secretary, said: “The CWU has consistently called for a government review on the impact of competition on postal services. In light of these results we now repeat that call for an urgent review.â€
CWU response to Royal Mail’s financial results
Royal Mail’s profits are disappointing and come as a direct result of mismanagement, Postcomm’s irresponsible decisions, and unfair competition.
Billy Hayes, General Secretary, said: “The CWU has consistently called for a government review on the impact of competition on postal services. In light of these results we now repeat that call for an urgent review.â€
OPG London W1