TO MANY PUSSYS AND WHIMPS ACTING LIKE FOOLS...

[L Tommo]

And the world did gaze, in deep amaze, at those fearless men, but few
Who bore the fight that freedom's light might shine through the foggy dew


and in their greatest hour they considered the situation and said:

f**k off .

FUNNY AS FECK!!!! Ohhh my giddy aunt!! MOAN MOAN MOAN YOU DO LIKE STIRING A HORNETS NEST DONTCHA!!!

HAHAHAHA!!! YOU MUPPET!!

[moanmoanmoan]

This moaning p***k has no idea whatsoever about this job, but comes on here telling us to get another job if we don't like it, telling us strike breakers should be paid more (the Quisling s**t) and that we refuse to modernise! What a bell end he is!

As ever you "pick" points out of context - follow the thread:

"True Blue Terrier - Good points well made.

I hope things get sorted.

My earlier point on pensions was not that contributions should stop. Essentially those already in the scheme should continue under the same terms.
My suggestion was that the current scheme should finish and be replaced with a more sustainable option for new members of staff.

I do not agree with RM moving the goalposts and changing your current agreement.

I also agree with your point re mail pricing - at the end of the day the decline of the RM began with deregulation.
The other mail services that are now winning much of the lucritave business mail are still using posties to deliver.
So the advantage is?
Oh yes TNT etc now make money that should be heading to RM.

I am not anti RM workers standing up for fair and reasonable rights and conditions.

You do have to admit that some of the work practices employed are a bit 1970's

On the same note I believe that the RM management come from the 1870's and that a lot of the new proposals are absurd.

Your points have been fair and reasoned

What does irritate me is the 1970's "up the workers" stance from some of your board members[/b

IWW - have you ever seen "Carry on at your Convenience"?

[IWW Fellow Worker]

f**k off you scab apologist.

Now IWW mate Moan wont like that little comment....




LOL Ohh well never mind.... I do find moan moan moan's """I am happy to finish that now - either dont throw one line abuse and replace it with a decent response(which I know you can do - as on accasions you have) or dont respond at all. """

VERY PATRONISING.... So in light of that i would of said much the same...... Not like you need a person to back you IWW its just the common ground we NON SCAB LIKING PEOPLE HAVE....


OUT

Cheers Tommo lad! I've been seeing off feckers like this since the day I started school. He's worse than a scab, because he actually supports the bastards. The nerve of the sad sod coming on here with crap like that!

[L Tommo]

No bother pal... I feel anyone who comes on and wants to show off there interlect of RM and our cause is badly in need of a lay down....

Shame moan moan is like a bulldog with a bone... HE AINT GONNA LEARN A THING UNLESS HE LISTENS BEFORE HE SPOUTS OFF CRAP....



oHHHH WELL...

[IWW Fellow Worker]

My earlier point on pensions was not that contributions should stop. Essentially those already in the scheme should continue under the same terms.
My suggestion was that the current scheme should finish and be replaced with a more sustainable option for new members of staff.


You do have to admit that some of the work practices employed are a bit 1970's


I am not anti RM workers standing up for fair and reasonable rights and conditions.

What a condescending bastard!

[moanmoanmoan]

f**k off you scab apologist.

Now IWW mate Moan wont like that little comment....




LOL Ohh well never mind.... I do find moan moan moan's """I am happy to finish that now - either dont throw one line abuse and replace it with a decent response(which I know you can do - as on accasions you have) or dont respond at all. """

VERY PATRONISING.... So in light of that i would of said much the same...... Not like you need a person to back you IWW its just the common ground we NON SCAB LIKING PEOPLE HAVE....


OUT

L Tommo you are as perceptive as ever.

No I don't like or agree with the comment.

I presume that a member of another union is also a scab by your logic.

I belive in free choice and democracy.

As I have said god knows how many times if any member of your union who did not go along with the strike I would consider to be a scab.

Other people - who were not invoved in the vote to strike - how can you consider them strike breakers?

They just have a different opinion to you.

IWW's point about me being a "scab apologist" as ever is uneducated, unjustified and incorrect. My disagreement is the definition of the term.

IWW defines a scab as anyone that disagrees with him - I would define a "scab" as a union member who works when , through a democratic decision strike axtion has been called.

My "finish it" comment was not meant to be patronising but just trying to recognise that differences can not be resolved.

Fine - that it what you want - but I think that the board moderators have different ideas.

Hence - agree to disagree

[L Tommo]

SWEEPING STATEMENTS AGAIN MOAN MOAN MOAN,,,,,


(shakes head)


Go read you posts and the points you make against IWW and My thoughts!!!


OUT :lfo :cfo

[moanmoanmoan]

My earlier point on pensions was not that contributions should stop. Essentially those already in the scheme should continue under the same terms.
My suggestion was that the current scheme should finish and be replaced with a more sustainable option for new members of staff.


You do have to admit that some of the work practices employed are a bit 1970's


I am not anti RM workers standing up for fair and reasonable rights and conditions.

What a condescending bastard!

Maybe I should have said "some of the attitudes are very 1970's"

[moanmoanmoan]

And the world did gaze, in deep amaze, at those fearless men, but few
Who bore the fight that freedom's light might shine through the foggy dew


and in their greatest hour they considered the situation and said:

f**k off .

FUNNY AS FECK!!!! Ohhh my giddy aunt!! MOAN MOAN MOAN YOU DO LIKE STIRING A HORNETS NEST DONTCHA!!!

HAHAHAHA!!! YOU MUPPET!!

L tommo - just quoted your mate - if that is stiring then fair cop!!!

[IWW Fellow Worker]

IWW defines a scab as anyone that disagrees with him

Where have I said that, you lying twat? I know exactly what a scab is, and your definition is worthless because it is the opinion of a liar, a scab apologist and contradicts the original meaning of the word. Now off you f**k before you get all upset and have to resort to telling us all about your wife and kids again to try and win a bit of sympathy from 3,000 people you don't even know.

[IWW Fellow Worker]

My earlier point on pensions was not that contributions should stop. Essentially those already in the scheme should continue under the same terms.
My suggestion was that the current scheme should finish and be replaced with a more sustainable option for new members of staff.


You do have to admit that some of the work practices employed are a bit 1970's


I am not anti RM workers standing up for fair and reasonable rights and conditions.

What a condescending bastard!

Maybe I should have said "some of the attitudes are very 1970's"

Mine aren't. Mine go back much further than that. Perhaps you should educate yourself instead of trolling on here.

[IWW Fellow Worker]

SWEEPING STATEMENTS AGAIN MOAN MOAN MOAN,,,,,


(shakes head)


Go read you posts and the points you make against IWW and My thoughts!!!


OUT :lfo :cfo

The f****r will go the same was as his mate Gazza 9000, and disgusted in due course.

[L Tommo]

IWW defines a scab as anyone that disagrees with him

Where have I said that, you lying twat? I know exactly what a scab is, and your definition is worthless because it is the opinion of a liar, a scab apologist and contradicts the original meaning of the word. Now off you f**k before you get all upset and have to resort to telling us all about your wife and kids again to try and win a bit of sympathy from 3,000 people you don't even know.

VERY TRUE!!!

IWW i see MOAN MOAN MOANS comments much the same... And thats not stiring or picking sides!!

OUT

[moanmoanmoan]

SWEEPING STATEMENTS AGAIN MOAN MOAN MOAN,,,,,


(shakes head)


Go read you posts and the points you make against IWW and My thoughts!!!


OUT :lfo :cfo

L tommo - I understand your point of view - hence the agree to disagree suggestion.

It is an argument that neither side can win as you have your opinion and I have mine.

[moanmoanmoan]

IWW defines a scab as anyone that disagrees with him

Where have I said that, you lying twat? I know exactly what a scab is, and your definition is worthless because it is the opinion of a liar, a scab apologist and contradicts the original meaning of the word. Now off you f**k before you get all upset and have to resort to telling us all about your wife and kids again to try and win a bit of sympathy from 3,000 people you don't even know.

I am neither a liar or a scab apologist.

I have been considering your stance on a number of things.

You continually come out with little digs "inspired" my you IWW union background.

Frankly looking at this union I am surpised that Leighton and Crozier have not offered you a job as senior management.

I mean - your little club has been going for over 100 years and at its height had more than 100,000 members.

Now - well about 2000 with less than half paid up!! Impressive for a "big" global union.

With figures like that you would fit in a treat.

And here in the UK - well again over 100 years you have 200 ish members - staggering growth record you your all inclusive union open to so many.
I am sure most of the members you do have are students called Piers or Tarquin and are just doing the rebel stint until going off to be MP's, lawyers or merchant bankers.

So it apears IWW that I am not the only one who considers most of what you say to be complete rubbish. If you carry on developing your IWW union with the same success then hopefully the membership will be down to 1 pretty soon.

Sure a lot of the proposals made by your management were also rubbish - but your only aim to to destroy everything.

Most of your fellow RM workers just want to get a fair deal and maintain a service -you want to kill it- suggest you get your CV off to Leighton and Crozier - You apear to have a lot in common

Most of the