ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Lads read this before Tuesday

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
bigal383
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 492
Joined: 11 Dec 2012, 16:20
Gender: Male

Lads read this before Tuesday

Post by bigal383 »

Weve be mad not to vote to strike otherwise we are screwed
Lounge Lizard
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 9458
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54

Lads read this before Tuesday

Post by Lounge Lizard »

What proportion think
( a ) yes, jobs will be lost if we strike,
( b ) no, jobs will be lost whether we strike or not,
( c ) no, jobs will be lost but the job's too much now so thanks for the impending redundancy ?
westham000
Posts: 106
Joined: 17 Nov 2011, 18:44
Gender: Male

Lads read this before Tuesday

Post by westham000 »

Heard Moya was in Battersea SW11 today. Heard that someone asked her a question about working for Easy Jet. She denied it, said it was a rumour.

Can anyone who was at that meeting confirm this ?. .
Grinder64
Posts: 245
Joined: 28 Oct 2009, 17:54
Gender: Male

Lads read this before Tuesday

Post by Grinder64 »

westham000 wrote:Heard Moya was in Battersea SW11 today. Heard that someone asked her a question about working for Easy Jet. She denied it, said it was a rumour
http://corporate.easyjet.com/about/mana ... -directors" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
You do the work, they get the loot. The men with the smiles and the 3 piece suits.
fly-catchers
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 573
Joined: 05 Oct 2008, 16:38
Gender: Male

Lads read this before Tuesday

Post by fly-catchers »

westham000 wrote:Heard Moya was in Battersea SW11 today. Heard that someone asked her a question about working for Easy Jet. She denied it, said it was a rumour.

Can anyone who was at that meeting confirm this ?. .
She is correct.. It is only a rumour that she actually works!!
Postie45
Posts: 2160
Joined: 21 Aug 2012, 23:05
Gender: Male

Lads read this before Tuesday

Post by Postie45 »

Lounge Lizard wrote:What proportion think
( a ) yes, jobs will be lost if we strike,
( b ) no, jobs will be lost whether we strike or not,
( c ) no, jobs will be lost but the job's too much now so thanks for the impending redundancy ?
c) and i dont think theyll have trouble getting rid of enough people provided they meet the current VR package, i sure as hell would take it.
sixfoottwo
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 569
Joined: 11 May 2017, 15:15
Gender: Male

Lads read this before Tuesday

Post by sixfoottwo »

You would be really really stupid not to back the union, If we go against them we are more screwed than we think no matter what you think about the union.
CPTNemoUK
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 707
Joined: 03 Oct 2013, 10:13
Gender: Male

Lads read this before Tuesday

Post by CPTNemoUK »

I am off this week so going to miss it :thumbdown
NWpostie
Posts: 3620
Joined: 04 Aug 2007, 17:32
Gender: Male
Location: Sector 001 Borg Collective, 6 o f 9

Lads read this before Tuesday

Post by NWpostie »

Have the ballot papers been sent out yet ? I've not seem anything myself.
Six of Nine loves Seven of Nine, together in Electric Dreams.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72759
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Lads read this before Tuesday

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

westham000 wrote:Heard Moya was in Battersea SW11 today. Heard that someone asked her a question about working for Easy Jet. She denied it, said it was a rumour.

Can anyone who was at that meeting confirm this ?. .
I'd be amazed if she did as the Union have put out an LTB on it, and Royal Mail made a press release on the subject, which they have to do by law.

Also "The Times", the FT and LSE have all run stories on it.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
cloherty1976
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 1236
Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 12:16
Gender: Male
Location: The south

Lads read this before Tuesday

Post by cloherty1976 »

Postie45 wrote:
Lounge Lizard wrote:What proportion think
( a ) yes, jobs will be lost if we strike,
( b ) no, jobs will be lost whether we strike or not,
( c ) no, jobs will be lost but the job's too much now so thanks for the impending redundancy ?
c) and i dont think theyll have trouble getting rid of enough people provided they meet the current VR package, i sure as hell would take it.
B would be my answer. But more jobs will go if we lose buisiness which strikes will inevitably do. We are a private company and profit has to be top of the list whether we like it or not!
ernieshoe
Posts: 117
Joined: 07 Dec 2016, 15:40
Gender: Male

Lads read this before Tuesday

Post by ernieshoe »

cloherty1976 wrote:
Postie45 wrote:
Lounge Lizard wrote:What proportion think
( a ) yes, jobs will be lost if we strike,
( b ) no, jobs will be lost whether we strike or not,
( c ) no, jobs will be lost but the job's too much now so thanks for the impending redundancy ?
c) and i dont think theyll have trouble getting rid of enough people provided they meet the current VR package, i sure as hell would take it.
B would be my answer. But more jobs will go if we lose buisiness which strikes will inevitably do. We are a private company and profit has to be top of the list whether we like it or not!
So its an A really then.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72759
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Lads read this before Tuesday

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

ernieshoe wrote:
cloherty1976 wrote:
Postie45 wrote:
Lounge Lizard wrote:What proportion think
( a ) yes, jobs will be lost if we strike,
( b ) no, jobs will be lost whether we strike or not,
( c ) no, jobs will be lost but the job's too much now so thanks for the impending redundancy ?
c) and i dont think theyll have trouble getting rid of enough people provided they meet the current VR package, i sure as hell would take it.
B would be my answer. But more jobs will go if we lose buisiness which strikes will inevitably do. We are a private company and profit has to be top of the list whether we like it or not!
So its an A really then.

Only in doublespeak
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
cpsteve
Posts: 699
Joined: 20 Apr 2016, 15:46
Gender: Male

Lads read this before Tuesday

Post by cpsteve »

If the company is run well we should be gaining jobs as we grow. If they carry on in the same direction then jobs will go strike or no strike. So its a vote of no confidence in our leadership from me.
JKSmudge
Posts: 395
Joined: 26 Mar 2015, 13:39
Gender: Male

Lads read this before Tuesday

Post by JKSmudge »

Got a message on PDA today about Industrial action being welcomed by the competition as companies are planning now for Black Friday & Xmas deliveries..blah....blah

Well RM have had all year to get some of the issues resolved, and now blame us for putting company business at risk. :arrrghhh

Bring on the strike ASAP , it's do or die time folks - either stand up to RM or spend the rest of your life on your knees.