CWU support of Jeremy Corbyn

Post by **dvbuk55** » 04 Dec 2016, 19:16

Tman wrote:God help us all, as the Tories will walk it for years to come..

I quite like Andrew Neill he often doesn't let politicos get away with answering a question he hasn't asked.

Post by **dvbuk55** » 10 Dec 2016, 10:04

Well forecasts have apparently been correct judging from the last two local elections, this time beaten into 4th place behind UKIP and the Lib Dems. What is Labour going to do to bring back confidence in it's leadership and manifesto. The latest poll shows the Tories 17% in front of Labour and Theresa May the choice for Prime Minister.

Tman · Post by **Tman** » 10 Dec 2016, 17:16

Apparently the old scruff's brain nearly exploded when Tatchell and co disrupted his speech with anti-Russian placards. Clearly dealing with on-the-hoof problems floors him, and anti-Russian sentiment puzzles the old fool intensely too.
No point in mentioning his praise of the dictator that was Castro; he was never going to let the passing of such a "Giant of the Left" go unmarked.
Poor old Jez doesn't realise he's not a student and it's not 1968 anymore.

Post by **dvbuk55** » 10 Dec 2016, 17:27

Tman wrote:Apparently the old scruff's brain nearly exploded when Tatchell and co disrupted his speech with anti-Russian placards. Clearly dealing with on-the-hoof problems floors him, and anti-Russian sentiment puzzles the old fool intensely too.
No point in mentioning his praise of the dictator that was Castro; he was never going to let the passing of such a "Giant of the Left" go unmarked.
Poor old Jez doesn't realise he's not a student and it's not 1968 anymore.

If only he had access to a time machine, he could go back in time to the 60s and become relevant again. It looks like his most ardent supporters are starting to get squeaky bum time.

fishtank · Post by **fishtank** » 11 Dec 2016, 15:26

Corbyn wouldn't have been relevant even in the sixties, he's a pontificator, not a leader. He is the perfect example of Buridan's ass, if his life depended on his decision making skills we would be as well writing his obituary now. The experiment is over, there is no real appetite for the kind of politics he proposes, it's a shame but it's a fact, in the meantime we have a single party state and no effective means of stopping their excesses, if it wasn't for the Tory party's own internal shenanigans we would be working for company store tokens by now...well done momentum.

Post by **baldrick** » 12 Dec 2016, 08:40

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clG8ha2D26g" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Post by **dvbuk55** » 12 Dec 2016, 09:08

baldrick wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clG8ha2D26g

Aye not that flattering for Jezzas women cabinet members, though more than apt - Cue Diane Abbott on the politics show

Tman · Post by **Tman** » 12 Dec 2016, 09:52

That useless lump of lard was even worse on the Andrew Marr show yesterday (11/12) ....completely unable to explain Labour's stance on the free movement of people/immigration/Brexit vote in parliament, and unable to offer any coherent strategy (after the recent by-election annihilation) other than "voters will recognise what a powerful and electable man Corbyn is by 2020".
Couldn't even acknowledge that to state (when asked about the coming Brexit vote and how Labour will vote, replying "we will do what's best for the British people" when most traditionally Labour areas outside of London voted overwhelmingly to Leave) that she and labour were still taking the "we know better than you plebs" stance.
Oblivion awaits you bunch of utterly traitorous losers.

Post by **baldrick** » 12 Dec 2016, 14:44

Three-Wise-Monkeys-in-the-Internet-Age.jpg

fishtank · Post by **fishtank** » 12 Dec 2016, 15:21

A wonderful defence of Labour's current precarious position baldrick, you've convinced me now pass me the fiddle, I know a good tune and I can smell something burning.

Post by **dvbuk55** » 12 Dec 2016, 15:48

fishtank wrote:A wonderful defence of Labour's current precarious position baldrick, you've convinced me now pass me the fiddle, I know a good tune and I can smell something burning.

The tragedy is ft that the corbynistas cannot smell the disaster about to befall the true labour party supporters who genuinely feel that a labour party truly equipped to be an effective opposition let alone a government in waiting is years away. I turned 70 on Sunday and I don't believe I'll live to see the day.

jetblack · Post by **jetblack** » 12 Dec 2016, 20:42

That must be the same three monkeys, Baldrick, that gave Trump 25/1 at the outset of his campaign

Makes a Lab majority at the next General election at 6/1 with William Hill look pretty tempting as well IMHO.

Post by **dvbuk55** » 12 Dec 2016, 20:47

jetblack wrote:That must be the same three monkeys, Baldrick, that gave Trump 25/1 at the outset of his campaign

Makes a Lab majority at the next General election at 6/1 with William Hill look pretty tempting as well IMHO.

Hey jet, no problem with that make the bet OR clod your money down the pan, at least you get to see it disappear that way

fishtank · Post by **fishtank** » 12 Dec 2016, 21:44

jetblack wrote:That must be the same three monkeys, Baldrick, that gave Trump 25/1 at the outset of his campaign

Makes a Lab majority at the next General election at 6/1 with William Hill look pretty tempting as well IMHO.

You're not really making much sense jet, Trump's victory shows that the voters are moving further away from liberal views, the man is about as far away from socialist values as you could be. What his victory means if it has any relevance at all in the UK is that a 1970s style Labour party is even less likely to be elected. Wake up and smell the coffee jet before it's too late.

Post by **dvbuk55** » 12 Dec 2016, 21:57

fishtank wrote: Wake up and smell the coffee jet before it's too late.

That is of course there is an understanding of what real coffee is, rather than the insipid crap served in 60s Wimpy coffee bars so beloved of the socialist beatnik generation of the 60s era "man".