Yes it's date of birth, the Way Forward Agreement stating "13.1 Where several employees start on the same day, the following factors will determine the relative order: firstly, any periods of Post Office service on other grades, secondly, date of selection and, thirdly, date of birth".JoeWagg wrote:Right. Just wanting to know the answer to a simple question which I've been given a few different answers.
If you start employment at Royal Mail on the same day as a bunch of other people, who has the most seniority when it comes to say a repick/vacancies etc? We got told at the induction that the person who was the oldest automatically ranks highest re seniority in such a scenario but people at work beg to differ. Help.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Seniority
-
Lounge Lizard
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 9458
- Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54
Seniority
-
mbavelja
- Posts: 60
- Joined: 19 Sep 2009, 12:55
- Gender: Male
Seniority
by dingo » 24 Jul 2016, 10:42
When the Age Discrimination law came in Royal Mail wrote the union amending a number of National Agreements which under their legal department breach the new law.
The first was that in age order between 55-65 could opt for VR first under MTSF
The second was than anyone between 50 and 60 could keep pay protection 60 rather the than 3 year pay protection limit ( when BT2010 agreement came in they increased on certain pay protection to 5 years.
Equally the third one was that could no longer use age when deciding who was more senior.
When the Age Discrimination law came in Royal Mail wrote the union amending a number of National Agreements which under their legal department breach the new law.
The first was that in age order between 55-65 could opt for VR first under MTSF
The second was than anyone between 50 and 60 could keep pay protection 60 rather the than 3 year pay protection limit ( when BT2010 agreement came in they increased on certain pay protection to 5 years.
Equally the third one was that could no longer use age when deciding who was more senior.
Round up the usual suspects.
-
NewPostieUK
- Posts: 2104
- Joined: 06 Jan 2008, 21:38
- Gender: Male
- Location: SickAsAChipLand
Seniority
Nope, a 32 year old with 16 years service would be higher up the seniority list than a 50 year old with 19 years in.greavsey wrote:It is definitely the oldest. Seniority? Self explanatory don't you agree?
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Seniority
It's often done on the toss of a coin these days.
The reasons are other PO service is unusual and not normally relevant, date of birth is legally "dubious" and date of selection previous to 2000 is difficult to provide because HR records of these details appear to be pretty sparse.
In most cases a bit of common sense is what's needed.
The reasons are other PO service is unusual and not normally relevant, date of birth is legally "dubious" and date of selection previous to 2000 is difficult to provide because HR records of these details appear to be pretty sparse.
In most cases a bit of common sense is what's needed.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
Ricardo44
- Posts: 164
- Joined: 15 Dec 2013, 20:34
- Gender: Male
Seniority
They might as well do away with seniority. In my office they never advertise vacant duties and never have a repick.
Duties are just handed to the managers favourites or whoever they feel like giving them to while others with more years in are never given a chance.
Totally unfair
Duties are just handed to the managers favourites or whoever they feel like giving them to while others with more years in are never given a chance.
Totally unfair