ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Corbyn

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Corbyn

Post by dvbuk55 »

jetblack wrote:The electoral system needs reform.

A minute portion of the UK electorate with 5 tellys, 3 sheds and a sauna in the conservatory.
I can understand your need to reform the electoral system, I mean lets keep reforming it until there's a minute chance of Jezza getting elected :cuppa

As for the sauna and conservatory - nope can't say I have either, I can't afford them - but I do have a greenhouse in which I grow tomatoes and peppers and peas, beans and potatoes and of course the ubiquitous herbs outside.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Corbyn

Post by dvbuk55 »

baldrick wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:
baldrick wrote: but it is not in his policies for the leadership election.
Why would it be, it would be a general election policy for the labour manifesto.
It should be in any Labour GE manifesto. Renationalisation of Royal Mail is Labour Party Conference policy, but was ignored by the previous leadership.
Why do you think that was? You don't think it was because it sounded left wing and wouldn't have been either relevant to the general electorate or supported.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Corbyn

Post by fishtank »

You can't reform the electoral system simply because the majority of voters don't get your message, at some point you have to question either the message or the messenger, pick one or both but don't waste your time blaming the system or the media or even the voters themselves, that's just taking your ball back because no one will let you score.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
k979aaa
Posts: 12578
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

Corbyn

Post by k979aaa »

At the end of the day here is someone who while I do not agree with his defence policy and other things is a true socialist and an alternative to the career politicians whether he is electable is for others to decide and for that we can vote for him or against him. This is democracy at work many countries don't have this right for all this we can be thankful for democracy!
baldrick
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 5038
Joined: 13 Sep 2007, 23:37
Gender: Male

Corbyn

Post by baldrick »

dvbuk55 wrote:
baldrick wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:
baldrick wrote: but it is not in his policies for the leadership election.
Why would it be, it would be a general election policy for the labour manifesto.
It should be in any Labour GE manifesto. Renationalisation of Royal Mail is Labour Party Conference policy, but was ignored by the previous leadership.
Why do you think that was? You don't think it was because it sounded left wing and wouldn't have been either relevant to the general electorate or supported.
No it was because there was a right wing Labour leadership. The privatisation of RM was unpopular with the general public, and the Tories did not have a mandate for it, they had said they would keep RM in public ownership.
What is the point of having a conference and policy resolutions if the leadership just ignores them?
Tman
Posts: 4144
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57

Corbyn

Post by Tman »

baldrick wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:
baldrick wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:
baldrick wrote: What is the point of having a conference and policy resolutions if the leadership just ignores them?
Some/most of those resolutions etc are put forward by assorted dreamers and nut-jobs, and aren't achievable in the real world. Then again, it's been long-recognised that all party conferences are really for net-working, alliance-building, drinking and a good chance to spend a few nights away with the girl-friend.
Labour's should be interesting next time though...seeing the Corbynistas in action should put paid to any effective parliamentary opposition for a good ten years.
baldrick
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 5038
Joined: 13 Sep 2007, 23:37
Gender: Male

Corbyn

Post by baldrick »

Tman iirc the resolution for renationalisation of RM was proposed by the CWU, and unanimously supported. This was three years ago, before the influx of new members. Most of the delegates then would have been long standing 'moderate' members.
baldrick
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 5038
Joined: 13 Sep 2007, 23:37
Gender: Male

Corbyn

Post by baldrick »

dvbuk55 wrote:I do have a greenhouse in which I grow tomatoes and peppers and peas, beans and potatoes and of course the ubiquitous herbs outside.
The_Good_Life_(logo_for_1975_TV_show).jpg
GoodLife3BBC_468x426.jpg
Do you keep chickens too dvbuk55? :Very Happy
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Tman
Posts: 4144
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57

Corbyn

Post by Tman »

baldrick wrote:Tman iirc the resolution for renationalisation of RM was proposed by the CWU, and unanimously supported..
QED.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Corbyn

Post by dvbuk55 »

baldrick wrote:Do you keep chickens too dvbuk55? :Very Happy
Nope, just a big cock baldrick, bet you wish you had a .............. chicken :chuckle
baldrick
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 5038
Joined: 13 Sep 2007, 23:37
Gender: Male

Corbyn

Post by baldrick »

Stop boasting! :no no
baldrick
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 5038
Joined: 13 Sep 2007, 23:37
Gender: Male

Corbyn

Post by baldrick »

And no, I don't have chickens or a big cock. :sad:
I don't have a garden shed, a greenhouse, or even a garden. Us Londoners can't afford those luxuries.

But you do have something in common with Jeremy Corbyn, he has an allotment. :thumbup
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Corbyn

Post by dvbuk55 »

baldrick wrote:And no, I don't have chickens or a big cock. :sad:
I don't have a garden shed, a greenhouse, or even a garden. Us Londoners can't afford those luxuries.

But you do have something in common with Jeremy Corbyn, he has an allotment. :thumbup
Well I don't live in London, I was stationed there once but I settled back where I was born. I understand the problems of housing in London and the difference in house values. My eldest brother who has turned 80 lives near Windsor, he has a detached house, a conservatory and a shed and greenhouse, so even in those areas all things are possible. I commiserate with your lack of erm..................large feathered poultry. :cuppa

I have nothing in common with Jezza other than grey hair, my garden is not an allotment, it's also a place for leisure with a pond with running water and fish, a large expanse of decking, several seating areas apple and pear bushes, a quite comfortable space to relax in, but best of all a place for my dog and I to play.
jetblack
Posts: 974
Joined: 15 Apr 2011, 12:54
Gender: Male

Corbyn

Post by jetblack »

dvbuk55 wrote: Nope, just a big cock
Who you trying to convince - us or you ? :shhhhh
dvbuk55 wrote:
Well I don't live in London, I was stationed there once but I settled back where I was born. I understand the problems of housing in London and the difference in house values. My eldest brother who has turned 80 lives near Windsor, he has a detached house, a conservatory and a shed and greenhouse, so even in those areas all things are possible. I commiserate with your lack of erm..................large feathered poultry. :cuppa

I have nothing in common with Jezza other than grey hair, my garden is not an allotment, it's also a place for leisure with a pond with running water and fish, a large expanse of decking, several seating areas apple and pear bushes, a quite comfortable space to relax in, but best of all a place for my dog and I to play.
I'm not quite sure what you are trying to achieve with all the bragging and the blatant "I'm al'right Jack"
But I'm guessing that it is your way of smugly assuring us that socialism stands no chance in the UK when people like you hold the balance of power. Amirite ?

I think you should vote Tory mate. Put your money where your mouth is.
What Labour needs to do is convince those that have f**k all - and there's a lot more of them than there is people like you. And its a much easier ask than trying to convince people like you who are far too fat and comfy :Very Happy

ps. please don't take any of this personally DVB. I'm making a point more than attacking you personally. When I mentioned your 3 kids living in your 3 sheds I didn't, of course, know that your son was at home.
Its all tongue in cheek - and the points are all made rhetorically, if you see what I mean.
And you are kind of playing up to it - truth be told :wink:
Good security means trying to limit the damage a Trusted role can do
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Corbyn

Post by dvbuk55 »

jetblack wrote:Its all tongue in cheek - and the points are all made rhetorically, if you see what I mean.
And you are kind of playing up to it - truth be told :wink:
No, you really think so? All the things I have stated are absolutely true, perhaps I should take photographic evidence and gloat even more. :wave
You are right though I have tried to make the point from a personal view that there are more people like me than the so called left wing downtrodden masses Corbyn and his corbynistas portray and purport to represent. I am and have always been a socialist as any long standing members would know BUT people like me whether labour, liberal, tory or any other persuasion are in the majority and there isn't a cat in hells chance of Corbyn persuading them to follow his misguided path.

I would also like to say that I left the army after 11 years with very little money, no house, furniture or job, which pretty much equates to the f all you cry about today - so the things I have and own haven't been given to me I have worked for everything that I enjoy, the benefits that I have accrued which has taken me a lifetime to acquire. During that lifetime I have worked throughout even until I was in my 69th year, no benefits or handouts and no expectation that I am owed a living.