ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Post peace deal

Latest Royal Mail and CWU news.This is an open forum.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72594
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Post peace deal

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/b ... 648683.ece

Christine Buckley, Industrial Editor

A deal to end the dispute that has crippled Britain’s postal service was agreed between Royal Mail and Communication Workers Union (CWU) officials late last night.

In a brief statement, the two sides said: “The agreed terms covering all the issues in the dispute will be considered by the union’s executive on Monday. Both parties will make a further statement thereafter.â€
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
pilsbury
Posts: 155
Joined: 04 Jun 2007, 20:17
Location: Over The Rainbow

Post by pilsbury »

Why is back pay only back dated to oct 1st ? :d'oh!
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Post by Big Daz »

175 lump sum instead
gangaspliff
Posts: 4
Joined: 21 Sep 2007, 08:22
Location: uk

Post by gangaspliff »

why is the back pay only from 1 october?
postmandriver
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Post by Big Daz »

Basic pay will rise to about £347 for a 40 hour week contract

Overtime rates rise by the same % 5.4 and 1.5
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72594
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

gangaspliff wrote:why is the back pay only from 1 october?
If its true then its a fiddle to try and make us think we got more than we actually did. I cant find it now but a member did predict this part about a month ago saying that the pay would not be backdated.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
catch
Posts: 202
Joined: 16 Jul 2007, 20:40

Post by catch »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
gangaspliff wrote:why is the back pay only from 1 october?
If its true then its a fiddle to try and make us think we got more than we actually did. I cant find it now but a member did predict this part about a month ago saying that the pay would not be backdated.
Exactly.

This needs working out, my maths is a bit s**t but worth a try.

Will work on the basis of getting £100 per year - easy to work out real amounts via that.

It's a two year deal, so:

Two years x £100 = £200

If it was backdated you'd get:

£200 x 6.9% = £213.80

But, you're only getting ~ 18 months.

£150 x 6.9% = £160.35
£160.35 + £50 already paid = £210.35

So it's really a 5.175% increase real terms, works out about 2.5% / year unless I've gone wrong somewhere.

Going on £347 basic pay according to Big Daz:

104 weeks x £347 = 36088

Backdated deal would mean: £2490 extra over two years
Not backdated: £1867

i.e. £600 less. So a 2.5% pay rise is made to look like 6.9% by not backdating and applying it to two years. As well as that, it's still only 3.5% a year even if taken at face value - so below inflation.

With D2D payments probably cut out, could still mean a net pay cut even taking inflation out of the picture completely. f***ing depressing and it's not even my wages. :pray
wraeth
Posts: 24
Joined: 12 Oct 2007, 02:14

Post by wraeth »

Of course it's a net pay cut!

More - it's potentially complete bloody capitulation on all fronts if it's agreed.
catch
Posts: 202
Joined: 16 Jul 2007, 20:40

Post by catch »

wraeth wrote:Of course it's a net pay cut!
Sorry I mean even if inflation was 0 it might be a net pay cut given some say they're earning £30+/week from D2Ds.
More - it's potentially complete bloody capitulation on all fronts if it's agreed.
I don't even want to think about what things are going to be like if this is accepted. UCU's pay deal was made last time when it was still the AUT I think, so probably up for renewal within the next 6 months, we'll probably get slaughtered. edit: If anyone cares I was almost right
G4GYJ
Posts: 58
Joined: 05 Oct 2007, 17:42

Post by G4GYJ »

I hope flexible working is kicked out and that they are not touching our pensions in any way, because if these issues are waterd down then I will be voting no to the deal. I have paid into the pension for over 30 years and I want what I signed up for all those years ago. I say again f--k AL and f--k AC the c--ts
anini
Posts: 67
Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 07:15

Post by anini »

this deal looks quarkey to quite alot of people. there is no doubt that in real terms its a pay decrease. alot of resentment is going to build up agains the union if they bring forward this kind of offer. :no no