clashcityrocker wrote:Given that you don't know what was said, how are you solely commenting on the alleged incident.Tman wrote:I'm commenting solely on this alleged incident in this thread.
You know absolutely nothing about the incident.
The poster made it clear that the comment was racist and deeply offensive.
You have decided it was a minor incident.
Roger Dawcy posted that "It referred to people of a certain race always wanting overtime, so it's work related" but as 'bustedflush' rightly comments "IF a certain ethnic group are (factually) acting in a certain way whether criminally or positively (as in this case working long hours) then as long as the truth is being told then there should be NO fear of retribution if told politely without aggression or insult."
What we don't know is whether the DOM actually made an incredibly offensive racist comment or whether a 'politically correct' Roger Dawcy considers referring to people of a certain race always wanting overtime, which might not be far from the truth, to be offensive.
It would therefore be helpful if Roger Dawcy could give us a better indication of what the DOM actually did say, otherwise further discussion based on wild speculation will be futile.