ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

"What question should be asked"

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
wabbithunta
Posts: 872
Joined: 03 Oct 2007, 18:39
Gender: Male
Location: On Planet Earth... Unlike the people who run RM!

"What question should be asked"

Post by wabbithunta »

Admin, could you please merge these threads to stop cross posting?

"what question should be asked"

SIP Form of Instruction for the Annual General Meeting
http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/communit ... 93&start=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
newtimes wrote:Anyone going to raise any questions, it appears all unanswered ones on the day will be reviewed by the "Chairman" after the AGM and a reply will be sent out in due course. This could make a great Post on its own right, "what question should be asked" email shareholderquestions@royalmail.com
SIPFormOfInstruction for RM AGM.jpg
"Your Starter for 10"
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"Better to die on your feet than live a life time on your knees"
Top
Pompey Boy
Posts: 428
Joined: 14 Jul 2009, 22:30
Gender: Male

Re: "What question should be asked"

Post by Pompey Boy »

Why do we use ATOS? Must cost RM a bomb!
How much worse can it get? A LOT F****** WORSE !!!
Top
gand
Posts: 253
Joined: 10 Aug 2011, 17:36
Gender: Male

Re: "What question should be asked"

Post by gand »

Why am I forced most days to work over my time :nana
Top
IloveMYredTROLLEY!
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1923
Joined: 02 Apr 2010, 06:54
Gender: Male

Re: "What question should be asked"

Post by IloveMYredTROLLEY! »

Why does Royal Mail's salary budget work on the basis that the new compulsory "Delivery To Neighbour" plan takes no more delivery time? :left: ;liar
Top
wannabeek
Posts: 996
Joined: 27 Apr 2011, 00:49
Gender: Male

Re: "What question should be asked"

Post by wannabeek »

"With regards to the Annual Report recently published, with reference to pages 64 and 67, can the board explain the justification for the total renumeration of the 11 directors in 2014 being £4.5million, yet for the same period the wages for the entire workforce, being nearly 150,000, totalled only £5million?"

2nd question, in case I'm allowed 2:

"With regards to the employee share scheme, referencing page 94 in the Annual Report, can the board justify why there are plans for the directors to be awarded a further 2.2million shares beyond their current allocation, yet there are no plans to provide any further shares for any of the other employees?"
Top
Lounge Lizard
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 9458
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54

Re: "What question should be asked"

Post by Lounge Lizard »

wannabeek wrote:"With regards to the Annual Report recently published, with reference to pages 64 and 67, can the board explain the justification for the total renumeration of the 11 directors in 2014 being £4.5million, yet for the same period the wages for the entire workforce, being nearly 150,000, totalled only £5million?"

2nd question, in case I'm allowed 2:

"With regards to the employee share scheme, referencing page 94 in the Annual Report, can the board justify why there are plans for the directors to be awarded a further 2.2million shares beyond their current allocation, yet there are no plans to provide any further shares for any of the other employees?"
Two sensible questions there but for most of the others knowing what they are like they will probably just write it off to a disgruntled member of staff and everything will carry on as before. :sad:
Top
tansorboy
Posts: 355
Joined: 22 Jan 2012, 12:41
Gender: Male

Re: "What question should be asked"

Post by tansorboy »

wannabeek wrote:"With regards to the Annual Report recently published, with reference to pages 64 and 67, can the board explain the justification for the total renumeration of the 11 directors in 2014 being £4.5million, yet for the same period the wages for the entire workforce, being nearly 150,000, totalled only £5million?"

2nd question, in case I'm allowed 2:

"With regards to the employee share scheme, referencing page 94 in the Annual Report, can the board justify why there are plans for the directors to be awarded a further 2.2million shares beyond their current allocation, yet there are no plans to provide any further shares for any of the other employees?"
A great pair of questions. Please ask a third. In fact, as one of the lowest paid members of the firm (with no historic allowances for things like driving (which we all do) and starting early (which none of us should be doing) I give you full permission to ask as many questions as you like.
Top
loverman shabba
Posts: 238
Joined: 11 Jul 2013, 15:15
Gender: Male

Re: "What question should be asked"

Post by loverman shabba »

why haven't i won euromillions yet?? :confused
Top
JP1
Posts: 77
Joined: 23 Aug 2011, 23:49
Gender: Male

Re: "What question should be asked"

Post by JP1 »

wannabeek wrote:"With regards to the Annual Report recently published, with reference to pages 64 and 67, can the board explain the justification for the total renumeration of the 11 directors in 2014 being £4.5million, yet for the same period the wages for the entire workforce, being nearly 150,000, totalled only £5million?"

2nd question, in case I'm allowed 2:

"With regards to the employee share scheme, referencing page 94 in the Annual Report, can the board justify why there are plans for the directors to be awarded a further 2.2million shares beyond their current allocation, yet there are no plans to provide any further shares for any of the other employees?"
If £5million is spent on 150,000 workers, we'd be on £33 a year (or 9p a day) each.
Top
wannabeek
Posts: 996
Joined: 27 Apr 2011, 00:49
Gender: Male

Re: "What question should be asked"

Post by wannabeek »

You're right. Good job I didn't stand up in the hall and ask that question. I'd have looked a right 'nana! :oops:
Top

Return to “BLUE SHIRTS”