ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

have the Georoute speeds changed?

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
Lincox
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3485
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 18:07
Gender: Male

Re: have the Georoute speeds changed?

Post by Lincox »

The steep and undulating assume that you are dropped off at the top of the hill. :Very Happy
Himaggen
Posts: 993
Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 23:40

Re: have the Georoute speeds changed?

Post by Himaggen »

Perhaps you could use that excuse for steep if going only downhill, but then why not just say downhill!

Undulating however can never mean anything other than up and down which disproves your theory.
datasaint
Posts: 1541
Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 17:19
Gender: Male

Re: have the Georoute speeds changed?

Post by datasaint »

What's the benchmark time for scanning a R/D, typing in the surname, knocking on the door, waiting for an answer, getting no answer, knocking next door, start writing out a 739, get no answer next door, complete 739, post it along with mail, mark on PDA no answer, endorsing the packet, putting the packet + scanner back in bag.

That's the real time killer.
Himaggen
Posts: 993
Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 23:40

Re: have the Georoute speeds changed?

Post by Himaggen »

ATTENDANCE CALL TIMES

Non-PDA Items
Successful attendance call - 25.6 seconds
Unsuccessful attendance call - 60.4 seconds

PDA Items
Successful attendance call (no signature) - 37.0 seconds
Successful attendance call (signature) - 52.9 seconds
Unsuccessful attendance call - 78.3 seconds

No additional time has been agreed for Deliver to Neighbour.
DB1100
Posts: 1976
Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 14:30

Re: have the Georoute speeds changed?

Post by DB1100 »

Himaggen wrote:ATTENDANCE CALL TIMES

Non-PDA Items
Successful attendance call - 25.6 seconds
Unsuccessful attendance call - 60.4 seconds

PDA Items
Successful attendance call (no signature) - 37.0 seconds
Successful attendance call (signature) - 52.9 seconds
Unsuccessful attendance call - 78.3 seconds

No additional time has been agreed for Deliver to Neighbour.
Has the union really agreed to these ridiculous time's,and what about the 5 minutes or so when you have to reboot the bloody thing,or the time wasted when the low battery warning pops up after the third call.
For we were soldiers once,and young
Himaggen
Posts: 993
Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 23:40

Re: have the Georoute speeds changed?

Post by Himaggen »

Those figures have not been agreed by the Union for actual timings, they are merely accepted for use in the delivery tools. (I would suggest they are implied as accepted, not agreed!)
Newbie001
Posts: 474
Joined: 30 May 2014, 17:29
Gender: Male

Re: have the Georoute speeds changed?

Post by Newbie001 »

Himaggen wrote:ATTENDANCE CALL TIMES

Non-PDA Items
Successful attendance call - 25.6 seconds
Unsuccessful attendance call - 60.4 seconds

PDA Items
Successful attendance call (no signature) - 37.0 seconds
Successful attendance call (signature) - 52.9 seconds
Unsuccessful attendance call - 78.3 seconds

No additional time has been agreed for Deliver to Neighbour.
Going by those figures I'm probably losing 30 secs to a min every packet. :crazy: Don't care what anyone says, if you knock on a door you've got to give people ample time to answer it and if you want a 739 that's not an illegible scrawl, then it takes a little longer still.
DB1100
Posts: 1976
Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 14:30

Re: have the Georoute speeds changed?

Post by DB1100 »

Newbie001 wrote:
Himaggen wrote:ATTENDANCE CALL TIMES

Non-PDA Items
Successful attendance call - 25.6 seconds
Unsuccessful attendance call - 60.4 seconds

PDA Items
Successful attendance call (no signature) - 37.0 seconds
Successful attendance call (signature) - 52.9 seconds
Unsuccessful attendance call - 78.3 seconds

No additional time has been agreed for Deliver to Neighbour.
Going by those figures I'm probably losing 30 secs to a min every packet. :crazy: Don't care what anyone says, if you knock on a door you've got to give people ample time to answer it and if you want a 739 that's not an illegible scrawl, then it takes a little longer still.
I agree 100%
For we were soldiers once,and young
arnold cheshire
Posts: 5309
Joined: 14 Oct 2010, 21:28
Gender: Male
Location: england

Re: have the Georoute speeds changed?

Post by arnold cheshire »

30 mph now you have to whizz round on a 50cc moped :left: :left:
wheresourmoney
Posts: 170
Joined: 27 Jan 2011, 14:50
Gender: Male

Re: have the Georoute speeds changed?

Post by wheresourmoney »

motch wrote:
Himaggen wrote:
POSTMAN wrote:Will ask again,anyone in the know,know whether these have changed?
dingo wrote:<…SNIPPED />
With an HCT 5.53 3.43mph
For HCT undulating 4.90 3.04mph
For HCT steep 5.19 3.22mph

With a light weight trolley 5.59 3.47mph
light weight trolley undualting 5.72 3.55mph
Light weight trolley steep 5.76 3.57mph
It is obvious that these figures are incorrect, you cannot be expected to go faster with a LWT over undulating or steep ground than you would over flat ground.
maybe they think you will push it hard up the hills and let it runaway on the downhills with you running after it :crazy:
You are not far wrong, the planner told us that you will lose time going up, but going down you will make up the time and more.
wannabeek
Posts: 996
Joined: 27 Apr 2011, 00:49
Gender: Male

Re: have the Georoute speeds changed?

Post by wannabeek »

Himaggen wrote:ATTENDANCE CALL TIMES

Non-PDA Items
Successful attendance call - 25.6 seconds
Unsuccessful attendance call - 60.4 seconds

PDA Items
Successful attendance call (no signature) - 37.0 seconds
Successful attendance call (signature) - 52.9 seconds
Unsuccessful attendance call - 78.3 seconds

No additional time has been agreed for Deliver to Neighbour.
I know this an old thread. Are those times still right? I usually give approx 2 mins from knocking on the door to walking away having carded it. Maybe I need to write faster?