All post by me in Green are Admin Posts. Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility. If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
I don't know who does their graphics but that bloke has just failed his driving assessment..
agenda.jpg
Maybe it's an omen....
I was particularly impressed with this sentence - copied verbatim
£200 lump sum payment for each full time eligible employee (pro rata for part-timers)
This was be paid before Christmas
I am wondering if the author posts on RMC occasionally.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts. Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility. If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
I was particularly impressed with this sentence - copied verbatim
£200 lump sum payment for each full time eligible employee (pro rata for part-timers)
This was be paid before Christmas
I saw that and I thought could an agreement of such legal complexity really have been drafted by people with such a glaring lack of attention to detail?
Or have they spent all the money on legal fees and just couldn't afford a proofreader?
I'm thinking of voting ON.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
Chelseablue wrote:Am voting no on b and h issues and workload .
Same as that, but really, all we're doing is making a principled stand..the yeses will have it. I think , although a lot of people on here seem capable of cutting through the bullshit, we aren't a cross section of RM employees and CWU members.
Agreed,
The only questions I have been asked is " how much money do we get" and " when do we get our back pay"
what a shock nothing in there about b&h in delivery & how this pile of crap will sort it out! Just banging on about pay pay pay!! The weak leaders of our union are happy as this deal will secure their wages for another 3-5 years due to us paying the bloody things! (While getting harassed & bullied in the process!) vote no!
halfull wrote:what a shock nothing in there about b&h in delivery & how this pile of crap will sort it out! Just banging on about pay pay pay!! The weak leaders of our union are happy as this deal will secure their wages for another 3-5 years due to us paying the bloody things! (While getting harassed & bullied in the process!) vote no!
Seconded why is it these agreements get vaguer and vaguer with each one another fudge of the issue they should call this agreement the Custard Tart Fudge Agreement of 2014 never have I seen anything about our workload nor the bullying being addressed big NO!