Unsealed envelopes

[rhino49]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-magazin ... r-25549394" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

People who deliver our mail warn unsealed envelopes are a menace. Why don't some people seal their post, asks Clare Spencer.

Les Savage from Crawley got in touch with the Magazine from the department which repairs parcels for the Royal Mail.

"The worst problem is that people do not stick down the envelopes, and this leads to literally thousands of damaged cards/envelopes each day," he wrote. "You have to try and match the card with the envelopes which sometimes cannot be done."


Unsealed enveloped were cheaper from 1892

While Royal Mail don't have any figures on the prevalence of the habit, Les is not the only one dealing with this peril. Deb Jones also bemoans people refusing to lick their envelopes on the Letter Box Study Group's internal message board.

"I've spent quite a lot of time dealing with ripped envelopes at work this month, modern sorting machinery doesn't like them being unsealed! "

So why do some people refuse to seal their envelopes?

Ray Smith, also from the LBSG, suggests the habit stems back from when it was cheaper to send unsealed envelopes.

He says that in 1892, the Printed Paper Rate was introduced which allowed newspapers, pamphlets and circulars to be sent at the reduced price of one halfpenny, as a note about handstamps kept at the British Postal Museum and Archive explains.

"Envelopes were sent unsealed to allow checkers to ensure that the regulations were observed or apply a surcharge," Smith says. "Sealed envelopes were surcharged."

But Smith explains this rate was abolished in 1969 after the introduction of first and second class post in 1968.

The British Postal Museum Archive confirms that there was a concessionary rate for unsealed envelopes, which was 3p in 1965. When the two-tier system came in, the concession was scrapped and the cheapest service was a penny more at 4p for a second-class stamp.

So unstuck envelopes in modern sorting offices might be a hangover from bygone days. Equally, it may just be down to laziness. Or that lots of people don't like the taste of glue.

Either way, remember to seal your mail properly and you'll be doing your postie a favour.

[Lounge Lizard]

"The British Postal Museum Archive confirms that there was a concessionary rate for unsealed envelopes, which was 3p in 1965. When the two-tier system came in, the concession was scrapped and the cheapest service was a penny more at 4p for a second-class stamp." should be "there was a concessionary rate for unsealed envelopes, which was 3d in 1965. When the two-tier system came in, the concession was scrapped and the cheapest service was a penny more at 4d for a second-class stamp."

[bustedflush]

I feel uncomfortable with this issue. While on light duties I have had to go round 'killing off' and doing the RLB items, and have had numerous cards in this state, some of which could have had money or cheques/vouchers inside. It always worries me that this could lead to accusations if anything were discovered to be missing, and I'd rather deal with these with a colleague present or under a camera.

[chrisj]

The heat from the IMP or whatever those big machines at MC are called also unseal some envelopes (poor gums or adhesive sometimes too much can affect other mail?), friction, ripping and envelope lifting each other

[TrueBlueTerrier]

The heat from the IMP or whatever those big machines at MC are called also unseal some envelopes (poor gums or adhesive sometimes too much can affect other mail?), friction, ripping and envelope lifting each other

I have recently noticed a few envelopes that have a very localised burnt area, as though it had been stuck in a feeder or rollers. Wonder if this is the same cause.

[cloherty1976]

The heat from the IMP or whatever those big machines at MC are called also unseal some envelopes (poor gums or adhesive sometimes too much can affect other mail?), friction, ripping and envelope lifting each other

I have recently noticed a few envelopes that have a very localised burnt area, as though it had been stuck in a feeder or rollers. Wonder if this is the same cause.

When the IMPS and ILSM's are running at upto 60000 letters an hour this is always happens to a certain amount of letters.

[capitalbiker]

as late as today I had to ask a customer to seal their envelope, many in he last few weeks on their annual visit to the PO were under the misunderstanding that it was still cheoaer to send an open card overseas, and as for the customs declaration on printed paper outwith europe, 'oh. I've never been asked for that before', Bollocks madam!

then there's the folks from overseas asking for gum for their stamps !

it makes for some jollity in the day!

[stokes11eg]

Right through the 60's , unsealed envelopes were cheaper to send.

[Lounge Lizard]

The heat from the IMP or whatever those big machines at MC are called also unseal some envelopes (poor gums or adhesive sometimes too much can affect other mail?), friction, ripping and envelope lifting each other

I have recently noticed a few envelopes that have a very localised burnt area, as though it had been stuck in a feeder or rollers. Wonder if this is the same cause.

Is that in the very top right corner of the envelope ?

[TrueBlueTerrier]

The heat from the IMP or whatever those big machines at MC are called also unseal some envelopes (poor gums or adhesive sometimes too much can affect other mail?), friction, ripping and envelope lifting each other

I have recently noticed a few envelopes that have a very localised burnt area, as though it had been stuck in a feeder or rollers. Wonder if this is the same cause.

Is that in the very top right corner of the envelope ?

there and centre top