ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

wcm re-instated by union?

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72727
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: wcm re-instated by union?

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

dvbuk55 wrote:
POSTMAN wrote:
Brain Fury wrote:
Oh and "Brain Fart" - insults in a thread about bullying?
Another post edited!!
Seriously ffs guys!
Well call me old fashioned but I don't see that as bullying and that's probably part of the problem with B&H because it must be in the eye/perception of the beholder. It may be insulting but not bullying.
No one said its bullying but name calling or changing someones nickname on here, in a derogatory fashion is against the rules. It is also rather inappropriate in a thread about bullying.

Mind you if we all accept it wasn't bullying, how many times does someone have to do it for it to become bullying. :hmmmm
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: wcm re-instated by union?

Post by dvbuk55 »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:
POSTMAN wrote:
Brain Fury wrote:
Oh and "Brain Fart" - insults in a thread about bullying?
Another post edited!!
Seriously ffs guys!
Well call me old fashioned but I don't see that as bullying and that's probably part of the problem with B&H because it must be in the eye/perception of the beholder. It may be insulting but not bullying.
No one said its bullying but name calling or changing someones nickname on here, in a derogatory fashion is against the rules. It is also rather inappropriate in a thread about bullying.

Mind you if we all accept it wasn't bullying, how many times does someone have to do it for it to become bullying. :hmmmm
Well there you have it really if it was persistent and it offended the person it was aimed at then it could be considered bullying but a single throw away line? I might also point out the thread is about WCM not bullying :cuppa
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72727
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: wcm re-instated by union?

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

dvbuk55 wrote: Well there you have it really if it was persistent and it offended the person it was aimed at then it could be considered bullying but a single throw away line? I might also point out the thread is about WCM not bullying :cuppa
I know how annoying a thread being taken off its original subject :nervous :nervous :angel :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: wcm re-instated by union?

Post by dvbuk55 »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote: Well there you have it really if it was persistent and it offended the person it was aimed at then it could be considered bullying but a single throw away line? I might also point out the thread is about WCM not bullying :cuppa
I know how annoying a thread being taken off its original subject :nervous :nervous :angel :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle
I could take that as implied bullying Teebs :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle
LinChong
Posts: 229
Joined: 27 Sep 2012, 09:07
Gender: Male

Re: wcm re-instated by union?

Post by LinChong »

POSTMAN wrote:
Brain Fury wrote:
Oh and "Brain Fart" - insults in a thread about bullying?
Another post edited!!
Seriously ffs guys!
It's banter ffs.

If Brain Fairy doesn't understand he's not at the vicar's tea party, he should f**k off.

One of the best things about a CWU grade job is the freedom to banter.
Brain Fury
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 664
Joined: 07 Apr 2011, 18:03
Gender: Male

Re: wcm re-instated by union?

Post by Brain Fury »

LinChong wrote:
POSTMAN wrote:
Brain Fury wrote:
Oh and "Brain Fart" - insults in a thread about bullying?
Another post edited!!
Seriously ffs guys!
It's banter ffs.

If Brain Fairy doesn't understand he's not at the vicar's tea party, he should f**k off.

One of the best things about a CWU grade job is the freedom to banter.
"It's banter ffs" - isn't that the classic excuse from people accused of bullying? Actually I don't think it's bullying or banter. It's just a simple insult, in this context used by someone who thinks that a slight insult somehow diminishes my point of view. What was really sad about your original post is that you didn't even have the courage of your convictions, changing my forum name to Brain Fairy and then using a whole paragraph to explain that it wasn't an insult to me or or anyone else but never thinking that perhaps if such a lengthy explanation was required it would have been better not to use the phrase in the first place. Even sadder, after the moderators removed it (not at my request) you still didn't get the message and not only repeated it but suggested that I should "f**k off". As it happens I'm not insulted. "Brain Fury" isn't my real name any more than Brain Fart or Brain Fairy, it's not even Brian -or Ferry and I've been invited to f**k off plenty of times before - even by people I like. I'd be happy to trade insults with you but I imagine that's not really what the moderators want. So I hope they don't ban you because as I said previously your posts are always (well usually) really entertaining stuff. Oh, do I get paid for this post too?
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16689
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: wcm re-instated by union?

Post by clashcityrocker »

LinChong wrote:
It's banter ffs.

If Brain Fairy doesn't understand he's not at the vicar's tea party, he should f**k off.

One of the best things about a CWU grade job is the freedom to banter.
Embarrassing.
Are we free to banter about people's sexuality, colour, race, creed or gender in any way we see fit and then tell them to f**k off if they don't like it?
No wonder Moya thinks most of the bullying is done by posties and not managers.

And if he does f**k off, does that make RMC a better, more diverse debating place or not?
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
borders
Posts: 1304
Joined: 11 Sep 2007, 09:10

Re: wcm re-instated by union?

Post by borders »

banter can often spill over and become insulting. an insult can be used just once , to let that person know you don't really like them or their opinion. to continually insult someone IMO then becomes harassment of a kind , which then can spill over into bullying from one side if neither person backs down.
"why should it just be the bankers, politicians and the idle rich who get all the best things ? we demand a standard of living for our members that enables them to share in the fine wines and times that the likes of Cameron and his Eton buddies take for granted " - the late great Bob Crow RIP.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: wcm re-instated by union?

Post by fishtank »

The biggest problem with "banter" in a work environment is that it tends to provoke the mob mentality,It can be relatively easy to deal with an insult from one person but if a group of people decide it's fair game to join in then that clearly is bullying and does lead to stress and anxiety in the victim.
Of course the instigator by this time is usually sitting in the background with a smug grin denying any culpability in the ensuing carnage.
It is a pathetic way for a bunch of so called adults to behave and the excuse used even by some managers who condone and sometimes join in with this behaviour that it's just office banter is equally pathetic.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: wcm re-instated by union?

Post by dvbuk55 »

:hmmmm Would repartee come under the same banner I wonder and is there a distinction?
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72727
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: wcm re-instated by union?

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

LinChong wrote:
POSTMAN wrote:
Brain Fury wrote:
Oh and "Brain Fart" - insults in a thread about bullying?
Another post edited!!
Seriously ffs guys!
It's banter ffs.
Its only banter if the name change is acceptable to both parties and if its acceptable to the community. Brain Fury has indicated his own feelings previously and its always been frowned upon on here unless initiated by the member themselves
LinChong wrote:If Brain Fairy doesn't understand he's not at the vicar's tea party, he should f**k off.
You get warned about changing names, claim its banter, then ruin that position by using an expletive which breaks at least 2 rules.
LinChong wrote:One of the best things about a CWU grade job is the freedom to banter.
But banter has to acceptable to both sides, if not it can become abuse and bullying.

Please follow the rules.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.