ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

gross misconduct charge

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
diabolic
Posts: 17
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 15:35
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by diabolic »

Cheers for that guys. Will let you know the outcome.
halfull
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 858
Joined: 22 Jan 2011, 13:37
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by halfull »

sorry to say the way they are using sacking people as a tool to lower the headcount you fate is sealed! you will most certainly get the sack in this new age of sacking posties for fun.
Thunderthighs
Posts: 990
Joined: 14 Jul 2009, 19:42
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by Thunderthighs »

I was born in the 50's, Wouldnt know how to send a PDA Message!

I wudda thort for a First Offence, a Written Warning type thing wudda done, if they deem it THAT serious.

Surely The CWU/Simpson Millar are getting involved, if dismissal is mentioned?

Good luck
General Mannerheim
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 2299
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 13:10
Gender: Male
Location: Stalag 17

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by General Mannerheim »

Thunderthighs wrote:I was born in the 50's, Wouldnt know how to send a PDA Message!

I wudda thort for a First Offence, a Written Warning type thing wudda done, if they deem it THAT serious.

Surely The CWU/Simpson Millar are getting involved, if dismissal is mentioned?

Good luck
nope they are busy drawing up shite legally binding deals. :roll:
Royal Mail managers.....about as popular as a t.urd in a swimming pool!
The DDA/Equality Act demands action,NOT words......adjustments NOT Occupational Health referrals.Case No:2505901/09
Royal Mail is an Equal Opportunities Employer..It discriminates against everybody.
diabolic
Posts: 17
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 15:35
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by diabolic »

shouldn't they suspend me if they are going to dismiss me? i`m still performing my duty...anyway time to look for something new to do.
IcanthelpthewayIam
Posts: 4067
Joined: 26 May 2009, 13:37
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by IcanthelpthewayIam »

diabolic wrote:shouldn't they suspend me if they are going to dismiss me? i`m still performing my duty...anyway time to look for something new to do.
no unfortunately should only be suspended if you were considered a threat to the mail or other members of staff
monkey76
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 98
Joined: 22 Feb 2010, 14:15
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by monkey76 »

Gross miss conduct is a charge that warrants dismissal.U can read alot from the authority level the case is being dealt within. If it stays at lower level management then there intentions are not to dismiss because that manager does not have the authority. If its passed to the highest level manager in your unit then you could read into it that they may be looking to dismiss. Although it is petty and everyone on here would agree you shouldn't be sacked in todays climate you just dont know. As few years ago you wouldn't of been but the charge alone is something to be wary of considering the climate we work in today.
chillifingers
Posts: 20
Joined: 05 Apr 2013, 18:05
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by chillifingers »

Have you had your formal interview? If you have it will state on your letter "your charge" ie Gross misconduct and further on will say that dismissal could be an outcome of this interview. It also depends as somebody else has said who is doing the interview. If it's lower level management they won't have the authority to sack you, they have to be a certain grade. Good luck :thumbup
blackadder
Posts: 584
Joined: 04 Jul 2007, 20:49
Location: deep south

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by blackadder »

gross misconduct covers a load of sins of which we all have dun at least 1. i wish you well mate and hope you keep your job
the path of my life is strewn with cowpats from the devils own satanic herd
diabolic
Posts: 17
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 15:35
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by diabolic »

chillifingers wrote:Have you had your formal interview? If you have it will state on your letter "your charge" ie Gross misconduct and further on will say that dismissal could be an outcome of this interview. It also depends as somebody else has said who is doing the interview. If it's lower level management they won't have the authority to sack you, they have to be a certain grade. Good luck :thumbup
Yeah I had my interview with senior manager and the letter says all that. And yes he had authority to sack me. I asked him if dismissal is the only outcome and he denied but I will have to see what his decision will be. .
haddie
Posts: 143
Joined: 20 Mar 2011, 09:05
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by haddie »

some doms misuse the Code. I had one try it with me and by the time meeting was over he was looking real foolish.
postypie
Posts: 435
Joined: 18 Mar 2012, 19:37
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by postypie »

PDA rage....wow that is a new un.....I think this could be an Health and safety issue which needs addressing....
haddie
Posts: 143
Joined: 20 Mar 2011, 09:05
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by haddie »

one guy in our do shouts and swears when anyone takes his pda.
jack
Posts: 299
Joined: 28 Aug 2007, 14:32

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by jack »

haddie wrote:some doms misuse the Code. I had one try it with me and by the time meeting was over he was looking real foolish.

A lot of DOMs & DSMs misuse the code, and the 'code of business standards' .. but their still employed by RM to tell their tales.... :shhhhh
'Royal Mail leaders could not lead a worm, they'll never take our pride cos that's what we earn'
Son Of God
Posts: 188
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 13:34
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by Son Of God »

diabolic wrote:How bad " F#ck you c#nts" is?
Lol :)