ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Deal or no deal

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
Silly Sarah
Posts: 112
Joined: 06 May 2010, 22:13
Gender: Female
Location: wild west

Re: Deal or no deal

Post by Silly Sarah »

Rumple wrote:Twentyfive minutes..... I'm in suspenders here! :shock:
I'm gonna burst in a minute :cuppa
What have I done to deserve this?
Scotland1
Posts: 180
Joined: 06 Sep 2013, 16:17
Gender: Female

Re: Deal or no deal

Post by Scotland1 »

Silly Sarah wrote:
Rumple wrote:Twentyfive minutes..... I'm in suspenders here! :shock:
I'm gonna burst in a minute :cuppa
No ur not
Scotland1
Posts: 180
Joined: 06 Sep 2013, 16:17
Gender: Female

Re: Deal or no deal

Post by Scotland1 »

Scotland1 wrote:
Silly Sarah wrote:
Rumple wrote:Twentyfive minutes..... I'm in suspenders here! :shock:
I'm gonna burst in a minute :cuppa
No ur not
Where is dingo when u need him, he seems to be in the loop,
Silly Sarah
Posts: 112
Joined: 06 May 2010, 22:13
Gender: Female
Location: wild west

Re: Deal or no deal

Post by Silly Sarah »

ooh it was the big one....but he walked away from it! :crazy:
What have I done to deserve this?
IloveMYredTROLLEY!
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1923
Joined: 02 Apr 2010, 06:54
Gender: Male

Re: Deal or no deal

Post by IloveMYredTROLLEY! »

Wonder what is causing new records for the site? :cuppa
Martin Walsh
Posts: 4276
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
Location: neverland

Re: Deal or no deal

Post by Martin Walsh »

I told you earlier 7 days extension but not a unanimously decision.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Deal or no deal

Post by dvbuk55 »

Silly Sarah wrote:
Rumple wrote:Twentyfive minutes..... I'm in suspenders here! :shock:
I'm gonna burst in a minute :cuppa
:chuckle Keep your hand on your ha'penny lass.
feduppostie
Posts: 947
Joined: 24 Jun 2007, 19:46

Re: Deal or no deal

Post by feduppostie »

dingo wrote:I told you earlier 7 days extension but not a unanimously decision.
thanks Dingo

But f*cks sake! ( Not aimed at you)
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Deal or no deal

Post by dvbuk55 »

dingo wrote:I told you earlier 7 days extension but not a unanimously decision.
:chuckle :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle Laughing stock.

It's time to pull the plug on the Coco crew.
Last edited by dvbuk55 on 20 Nov 2013, 17:02, edited 1 time in total.
shepherdess
Posts: 445
Joined: 08 Jul 2009, 16:16
Gender: Female

Re: Deal or no deal

Post by shepherdess »

dingo wrote:The PEC are meeting in windsor as we speak and will decide.
So dingo what time should we expect something
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Deal or no deal

Post by fishtank »

dingo wrote:I told you earlier 7 days extension but not a unanimously decision.

And the strike ballot?
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
BernardBresslaw
Posts: 381
Joined: 24 Nov 2011, 15:52
Gender: Male

Re: Deal or no deal

Post by BernardBresslaw »

dingo wrote:I told you earlier 7 days extension but not a unanimously decision.
:chuckle RM must be laughing their bollocks off.
Godric
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 855
Joined: 17 Oct 2009, 12:08
Gender: Male
Location: The Kingdom of Alba

Re: Deal or no deal

Post by Godric »

dingo wrote:I told you earlier 7 days extension but not a unanimously decision.

if that is the case hayes/ward and the executive must resign
"Vi har haft århundraden av kärlek och tillit till varandra."
chrisj
Posts: 1883
Joined: 21 Dec 2010, 16:24
Gender: Male

Re: Deal or no deal

Post by chrisj »

Why just 7 days? It is getting a bit tiresome asking for a week when you need 3 weeks or more. Aren't you folks tired now and need a break?

7 days it is!
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16689
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Deal or no deal

Post by clashcityrocker »

dingo wrote:I told you earlier 7 days extension but not a unanimously decision.
No you didn't.
How did the voting go?
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.