Crikey Fish, have you been growing that since last Movember ?dvbuk55 wrote:biscuit1957 wrote:I need a laughclashcityrocker wrote:Any chance of a picture?fishtank wrote:I've already spent my £300 on a hat.![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm not sure if this is real or he was doing a Village Peeps:
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Your £300 Lump Sum
-
Pinky 1
- Posts: 1510
- Joined: 01 Mar 2009, 11:38
- Gender: Male
- Location: Wales
Re: Your £300 Lump Sum
"Cara yn bod 'n briod , dydy 'n fawr at ca a hun 'n anad berson a 'ch angen at blina achos 'r bwyso chan 'ch buchedd "
" I like being married,, it's great to find that one special person you want to bother for the rest of your life "
" I like being married,, it's great to find that one special person you want to bother for the rest of your life "
-
chrisj
- Posts: 1883
- Joined: 21 Dec 2010, 16:24
- Gender: Male
Re: Your £300 Lump Sum
Enlighten us. I suppose the £300 lump sum could have been stood down because it was part of the old agreement.
There was a £300 lump sum if there were no strikes before Christmas...
Are you implying the £300 is now part of the pay deal or offer?
TBH, money is money but I could not care less one way or the other. When I said it was not about the money, I meant it.
I am more concerned about my working conditions. I can always do OT if I wanted money or other jobs as a supplement.
There was a £300 lump sum if there were no strikes before Christmas...
Are you implying the £300 is now part of the pay deal or offer?
TBH, money is money but I could not care less one way or the other. When I said it was not about the money, I meant it.
I am more concerned about my working conditions. I can always do OT if I wanted money or other jobs as a supplement.
-
Pat Ostman
- Posts: 2797
- Joined: 17 Sep 2008, 21:53
- Gender: Male
- Location: In the Line Managers office being screwed over.
Re: Your £300 Lump Sum
CloseEnlighten us. I suppose the £300 lump sum could have been stood down because it was part of the old agreement.
The £300 HAS been stood down
There was never any agreement.
Run, rabbit run. Dig that hole, forget the sun.
And when at last the work is done. Don't sit down, it's time to dig another one
And when at last the work is done. Don't sit down, it's time to dig another one
-
halfull
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 858
- Joined: 22 Jan 2011, 13:37
- Gender: Male
Re: Your £300 Lump Sum
i can imagine the strike breakers in the morning whispering amongst themselves saying i wonder what is happening with the 300quid now?!?!?! go and ask the rep lol!!!!
-
chrisj
- Posts: 1883
- Joined: 21 Dec 2010, 16:24
- Gender: Male
Re: Your £300 Lump Sum
So the £300 lump sum has been stood down. Ok!
However, I was not talking about the £300 lump sum offered to individual strike breakers but the original £300 that was supposed to be paid if there were no strikes in an office before Christmas.
If the £300 has now been subsumed into a new pay offer - then the improved pay offer will have to be a whole load more than £300 in the first year, at the very least.
Whatever!
However, I was not talking about the £300 lump sum offered to individual strike breakers but the original £300 that was supposed to be paid if there were no strikes in an office before Christmas.
If the £300 has now been subsumed into a new pay offer - then the improved pay offer will have to be a whole load more than £300 in the first year, at the very least.
Whatever!
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: Your £300 Lump Sum
Ok one more time.chrisj wrote:Enlighten us..
The £300 lump sum was part of a proposed agreement between Royal Mail and the CWU.
It was rejected by the CWU,If a proposed agreement is rejected by either party it no longer functions as a proposed agreement.
So what does it become?
Nothing.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
Pat Ostman
- Posts: 2797
- Joined: 17 Sep 2008, 21:53
- Gender: Male
- Location: In the Line Managers office being screwed over.
Re: Your £300 Lump Sum
The original £300 was part of an offer that the union dismissed but there are so many fake £300 floating about you can never be sure which £300 anyone is on about these days.However, I was not talking about the £300 lump sum offered to individual strike breakers but the original £300 that was supposed to be paid if there were no strikes in an office before Christmas.
Except it doesn't exist and that's all you need to know.
The £200 on other other hand.... We'll you can have that this year if you want. :p
Run, rabbit run. Dig that hole, forget the sun.
And when at last the work is done. Don't sit down, it's time to dig another one
And when at last the work is done. Don't sit down, it's time to dig another one
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72559
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Re: Your £300 Lump Sum
The original offer of £300 to units that didn't strike was the only one in a pay offer and that was rejected. The £300 individual offer was never part of any offer and was thought illegal by the Union. The £300 may rear its ugly head, but I hope not because it will cost us, every bad or indifferent deal since I joined RM has had a bung attached. I wish they wouldn't do it I would rather have it as a 15p an hour rise on top of the pay offer.chrisj wrote:So the £300 lump sum has been stood down. Ok!
However, I was not talking about the £300 lump sum offered to individual strike breakers but the original £300 that was supposed to be paid if there were no strikes in an office before Christmas.
If the £300 has now been subsumed into a new pay offer - then the improved pay offer will have to be a whole load more than £300 in the first year, at the very least.
Whatever!
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: Your £300 Lump Sum
There may be a £300 lump sum in the new offer or the money used to finance the lump sum may just go into financing a bigger basic pay rise.chrisj wrote:If the £300 has now been subsumed into a new pay offer - then the improved pay offer will have to be a whole load more than £300 in the first year, at the very least.
On past experience a lump sum usually comes with a bitter pill to swallow because members will usually bite your hand off for a cash up front deal,the bigger the sum,the bitterer the pill.
If I was to take a pure guess this deal will have the lump and the pill,how big either will be is up for debate.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
Pat Ostman
- Posts: 2797
- Joined: 17 Sep 2008, 21:53
- Gender: Male
- Location: In the Line Managers office being screwed over.
Re: Your £300 Lump Sum
Yes, pretty sure the bung is on the cards again. It's good business sense.If I was to take a pure guess this deal will have the lump and the pill,how big either will be is up for debate.
Run, rabbit run. Dig that hole, forget the sun.
And when at last the work is done. Don't sit down, it's time to dig another one
And when at last the work is done. Don't sit down, it's time to dig another one
-
Senior Service
- Posts: 185
- Joined: 19 Aug 2007, 18:34
When Do We Get The £300 Then?
Now surely whatever is eventually agreed if we do not strike they must pay us £300.
Or do I think its a phantom £300 to which so many conditions will be linked that we will never get it.
Or do I think its a phantom £300 to which so many conditions will be linked that we will never get it.
-
bunkerland
- Posts: 546
- Joined: 11 Oct 2009, 21:40
- Gender: Male
Re: Your £300 Lump Sum
Just to clarify then, are you saying there might not be a 300?fishtank wrote:Ok one more time.chrisj wrote:Enlighten us..
The £300 lump sum was part of a proposed agreement between Royal Mail and the CWU.
It was rejected by the CWU,If a proposed agreement is rejected by either party it no longer functions as a proposed agreement.
So what does it become?
Nothing.
-
cloherty1976
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 1236
- Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 12:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: The south
Re: Your £300 Lump Sum
Forget the £300 and give us an extra £2 a week. That's £740 extra if you do 10 years. That's what I call a result!
-
chrisj
- Posts: 1883
- Joined: 21 Dec 2010, 16:24
- Gender: Male
Re: When Do We Get The £300 Then?
All £300 lump sum should be in one thread. Check the other thread that is about 29 pages or so long now
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: Your £300 Lump Sum
Well that may be ok for you whipper snappers but it wouldn't earn me much in ten years I'd be 77cloherty1976 wrote:Forget the £300 and give us an extra £2 a week. That's £740 extra if you do 10 years. That's what I call a result!