ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Dog bite incident could land pet owner with £68k legal fee

Latest Royal Mail and CWU news.This is an open forum.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72738
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Dog bite incident could land pet owner with £68k legal fee

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Dog bite incident could land County Durham pet owner with £68,000 legal fee

http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/1 ... ee/?ref=nt" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

A DOG owner whose beloved pet bit a postman believes he is a victim of the no-win-no-fee compensation culture after discovering he could face legal fees in excess of £68,000.

Paul Race, of Fishburn, near Sedgefield in County Durham, has always denied his dog Rocky attacked postman Robert Townsend while he was making deliveries in April 2008.

He claimed his pointer setter cross had merely nipped the postman, after he hit the dog with his satchel, an allegation fiercely contested by Mr Townsend and dismissed by a county court judge.

In March 2011, Simpson Millar Solicitors, the firm representing Mr Townsend, offered Mr Race the chance to settle for compensation of £2,000 and costs of £4,061 – a figure they say was far less than the actual costs incurred.

However, disputes over whether the dog belonged to Mr Race or his ex-partner and his differing account as to what took place when the postman was bitten, resulted in the case going before Middlesbrough County Court in January this year.

The judge ruled in Mr Townsend’s favour and he was awarded £1,500 compensation, which Mr Race paid.

But when he was presented with a bill of costs totalling £68,532.02 on January 31, the shocked 64-year-old felt he had no choice but to appeal.

The amount, which is still up for negotiation and must be approved by a judge, covers the cost of Simpson Millar solicitor fees, including the additional money awarded for winning the case, as well as the fees of barristers, medical experts, witnesses and other administrative and legal expenses incurred during the proceedings.

Simpson Millar said the firm made repeated attempts to mediate with Mr Race and urged on numerous occasions to settle for the original figure.
Ads by Google


On Tuesday (October 15), at the Civil Appeal Court in London, Mr Race’s attempt to overrule the judgement was rejected and the property landlord now fears the fees could be even greater - and could result in his home being repossessed.

“People think because I am a landlord that I have a lot of money but that is not the case,” he said. “My houses are all mortgaged and many are in negative equity. The rent they bring in pays the mortgage.”

He said the fees were outrageous, adding: “This highlights everything that is wrong with the no-win-no-fee system.”

Nathan Horsley, solicitor-advocate at Hedleys and Co Solicitors based in Sunderland, represented Mr Race throughout the case and disputed the notion his client had prolonged the proceedings.

“Mr Race made the decision to appeal based on Simpson Millar’s fees and the fact he didn’t agree with all that was said,” he said. “We didn’t charge Mr Race to represent him at the appeal as we felt he was a victim of the no-win-no-fee compensation culture.”

Nagam Din, Partner at Simpson Millar LLP, said: "Mr Townsend was subject to a distressing dog attack and, as such, he is entitled to compensation.

"From the outset, Simpson Millar has sought a swift and reasonable settlement to the case including mediation.

"Against the explicit advice from his solicitor to accept the court's original decision, Mr Race remained determined to continue the dispute which caused additional delay and associated costs."
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
DB1100
Posts: 1976
Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 14:30

Re: Dog bite incident could land pet owner with £68k legal f

Post by DB1100 »

What a silly man.
For we were soldiers once,and young
Lounge Lizard
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 9458
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54

Re: Dog bite incident could land pet owner with £68k legal f

Post by Lounge Lizard »

"Paul Race, of Fishburn, near Sedgefield in County Durham, has always denied his dog Rocky ..." :shock:
Not one to jump to conclusions but it's not about 'his dog Cuddles', no, 'his dog Rocky' and if I remember correctly Rocky was a 1976 American sports film about an uneducated debt collector for a loan shark who starts out as a club fighter. :shock:
UnhappyGremlin
Posts: 2685
Joined: 18 May 2012, 20:49
Gender: Male
Location: Hiding

Re: Dog bite incident could land pet owner with £68k legal f

Post by UnhappyGremlin »

Should have settled then.
Most pet insurers will pay out.
Probably didn't have any insurance, hence the insistence of the dog's innocence.
Sometimes, I wish I wasn't a Rep.