4th November strike: this is the big one

[Socialist postie]

CWU/Royal Mail: 78 per cent of postal workers vote to strike

16 October 2013 – by a CWU postal rep

It was announced this afternoon that postal workers have voted four to one for a strike to defend their wages, conditions and jobs in a newly privatised Royal Mail. The postal Communication Workers Union (CWU) has announced the first strike date for the 4 November.

The 78 per cent vote (on a 63 per cent turnout) by members of the postal CWU union is all the more impressive given the weeks of intense pro-privatisation and anti-strike propaganda by Royal Mail bosses, government ministers and the media.

The message is clear to Royal Mail bosses, led by CEO Moya Greene. Workers have rejected their weak offer and no wonder. In return for a below-inflation pay deal that protects terms and conditions for three years, postal bosses will clean out the pension fund, guaranteeing future cuts or even its closure. This swindle just puts money in one pocket today and takes it out of the other tomorrow.

The deal would still mean total flexibility, a huge workload hike, and job cuts that will see a drive to sack full time workers for the smallest reason, but leave postal workers unable to legally fight back by banning strikes.

The company could be broken up by franchising and further sell-offs, while zero-hour contract workers are brought in to undermine pay and conditions. And that’s just while the deal’s three year “protection” period holds! After it’s over, the axe will really start to fall. Postal workers were right to reject it.

Behind the bluff, Royal Mail is scared of action

The truth is that the prospect of a sustained and determined strike really scares Royal Mail bosses and their financial advisers. That’s why Green stooped so low as to attempt to bribe postal workers with a pathetic and divisive £300 bonus for those who scab on the strike.

Of course, the union is dead right to challenge this discriminatory bonus in the courts – and branches should take action from below if it is implemented. But it shows the stakes are high; if Royal Mail win, they will use all kinds of underhand measures to undermine the union; if we can beat them, we will strengthen solidarity between workers.

Dave Ward says that the CWU is giving the company two weeks to agree an acceptable deal, and “the clock is ticking”.

What we want is a groundbreaking, long term, legally binding agreement that not only protects postal workers’ job security, pay and pensions – but will also determine the strategy, principles and values of how the Royal Mail Group will operate as a private entity.
This means there will be no further breakup of the company, no franchising of individual offices or delivery rounds, no introduction of a cheaper workforce on two-tier terms and conditions and no part time industry.
It will mean – regardless of who owns Royal Mail – this company will not be able to enter the race to the bottom and replicate the employment practices and service standards of their competitors.”
But Moya & Co won’t give us what our union is demanding – a ten year deal locking in the whole structure of Royal Mail and all aspects of our job – without a hard fight. So 4 November has to be the start of the action, with a rapid escalation – two days, four days, six days, up to all out so we win quickly.

The two and a half week wait to strike has to be the last such delay – even that’s giving Royal Mail bosses too much time to get prepared.

Postal workers should hold workplace meetings to set up strike committees, as the Leeds CWU branch has resolved. That way the union can harness the energy unleashed on the shopfloor to ensure solid support for a strike.

Workplace meetings can discuss the form the strike should take too, calling on the CWU leadership to escalate quickly so we bury Royal Mail bosses under a mountain of undelivered mail. It’s our strike. There’s many who are worried that Dave Ward and Billy Hayes will drag things out or settle too early for an inadequate deal, so let’s take control of it.

Let’s organise solidarity

The media will try to make us look greedy and feel isolated but in fact we have potentially more support than ever, given massive public opposition to privatisation. Millions are disgusted by the spectacle of the government selling off Royal Mail a billion pounds too cheaply to ensure its success and reward their fat cat friends and speculators in the City – that’s where the real greed is.

Moya Greene has already hinted that there could be more stamp price hikes to squeeze postal service users in the near future. She is insisting that Royal Mail needs to be “smaller”, code for big job losses and radical restructuring, resulting in a reduced service for residential customers. Postal bosses are the ones damaging the service not us!

Let’s tap the public’s anger and hostility to the government, and not let media headlines and smears blunt it. The CWU can work with Peoples Assemblies, Trades Councils and anti-cuts groups to launch a solidarity movement and hardship fund to support escalated action, and coordinate with other unions in dispute such as the firefighters and teachers.

The TUC pledged in September to call a midweek day of strike action for the trade union movement – great, let’s call on them to do it. We should demand Labour backs us after all the millions the CWU has given them – and this year’s conference resolution to renationalize Royal Mail.

On that note, it is a shame that the CWU leaders did not set the strike date for 5 November day of action called by the People’s Assembly or coordinate it with other unions, like the teachers and firefighters. We could have had big demos in every locality and really raise public awareness about how this government is destroying public services.

This sectional approach, running the strike as if it was just “our business and nobody else’s”, is a mistake: the bigger the movement against the Tories and their LibDem hangers-on, the better for us.

A clear vote, now firm action

No doubt the Tories will claim that less than half of posties voted for strikes if you count the turnout. The massive media hype around privatisation and its “successful” float no doubt confused some workers and shrunk the turnout. The fact that our CWU tops let privatisation go through without a fight no doubt did some damage too.

However in the face of a tsunami of propaganda, activists should be proud they won a big “Yes” vote. Now we need to deepen our activity and workplace organisation to get a big turnout on 4 November, when it will become crystal clear that postal workers support our union and are committed to fight for our jobs.

Moya & Co. will almost certainly table another pre-planned “better” deal in the coming days, to pressure CWU leaders into delaying action, possibly even balloting us on a new deal. CWU members will have to watch Dave Ward, Billy Hayes and the rest of the Postal Executive like hawks to ensure they don’t call the action off or drag it out over weeks or months.

Royal Mail bosses will try to distract us and further delay things, but whatever they “offer” in the next two and a half weeks will be nowhere near what we need and much less than we can win if we strike. Let’s not drag it out anymore; let’s get striking.

Strikes – not rolling, not regional, not for isolated days, but escalating swiftly with the threat of an indefinite stoppage at the end – are what we should be focusing on. They can achieve far more, far more quickly than any boycott of rival companies’ mail, which the CWU leaders are now talking about.

We all know this is The Big One. Our whole future is at stake, but the ballot result proves that postal workers know the score and are up for a fight. If members can take control of the action, coordinate with other workers and build a massive solidarity movement around us, we can beat Royal Mail and this rotten, weak coalition government that stands behind them.

Hold workplace meetings to elect strike committees of elected, recallable delegates, and for these committees to link up nationally so rank and file members can control the action
No more delays or dropping strikes for talks: for a rapid escalation, up to an all-out indefinite strike, to win
Build a solidarity movement and launch a hardship fund: TUC name the day for an all-union strike – as agreed at this year’s Congress – in November
For a ten year deal to protect our jobs and industry
Renationalise all the postal and parcel operators and merge them into a single publicly-owned postal service under workers and consumers’ control, with no compensation for the millionaire speculators and shareholders
For more detailed coverage, read Royal Mail privatised: postal workers should vote Yes and prepare to fight



The ballot result in full was:

Turnout: 63% (71,913)

Yes votes: 78% (56,339)

No votes: 22% (15,624)

http://www.workerspower.co.uk/2013/10/c ... to-strike/

[swoosta]

Think again if you want to go with more than one day a week strikes let alone all out. Workers have mortgages to pay and bills to pay. You might have a council house but some of us will lose our homes

[Brain Fury]

One might get the impression that the OP thinks the strike is the end in itself rather than a means to secure an improved offer. Indeed he seems angry at the prospect.

[Stormproof]

You might have a council house but some of us will lose our homes

You still get booted out of a Council property if you don't pay your rent on time, so we are all in the same position.

[krussel]

Think again if you want to go with more than one day a week strikes let alone all out. Workers have mortgages to pay and bills to pay. You might have a council house but some of us will lose our homes

Question is could you pay your mortgage on a min wage.

This is where we will end up if we don't fight this one

[borders]

One might get the impression that the OP thinks the strike is the end in itself rather than a means to secure an improved offer. Indeed he seems angry at the prospect.

maybe he does , would you be happy with this ? a non- unionised workforce to completely exploit and push the profits up even further , you would love that , wouldn't you ?

[Brain Fury]

One might get the impression that the OP thinks the strike is the end in itself rather than a means to secure an improved offer. Indeed he seems angry at the prospect.

maybe he does , would you be happy with this ? a non- unionised workforce to completely exploit and push the profits up even further , you would love that , wouldn't you ?

As usual you completely miss the point.What on earth has this got to do with a non-unionised workforce? In principle I don't have a problem with a strike to support negotiations on terms and conditions of employment. It's when I read this sort of BS which implies that the purpose of the strike is to give RM, the Government or the "capitalist system" a bloody nose that I wonder if some people (including some posties) don't actually want there to be a settlement. I certainly wouldn't want to be losing a days pay for those people. What do you want?

[TrueBlueTerrier]

It matters not a jot to me what other people or organisations want to use my strike for, as long as they support my right to strike. Everyone should strike for their own reasons, personal, political, and from their own conscience. Only an idiot would strike for a political reason they don't support, but thats not the same as others using my strike to further their own cause, and the two shouldn't be confused.

[Puppetmaster]

Could some clever person Explain to me ,what a 1 day strike on a Monday at the start of the week with 14 days notice will achieve except grief for all on delivery.

Also the overall turnout looks low to me 63 per cent ,what is the percentage of mail center staff employed by the Company and delivery staff.?
As usual see nothing our present Union leaders are doing will acheive any thing .

We need fresh blood in the top with fresh ideas,
after being on the Picket lines 4 years ago and fighting for a fairer deal ,then these 2 Clowns and the Tuc got us quote "the deal of the century"
now we can have on a occasions 6 d2d no pay and have to take them to houses we have not got mail for and 90 seconds to deliver packets per house and even larger walks ,whilst the non Deliverey staff get the same pay for nothing Some deal!!

And now we are expected to suppourt these CLOWNS .!

[borders]

well the bloke who wrote that article is a CWU Rep . while this is our coalface , is there not a bigger picture here ? I support the teachers on strike today , even though it is causing me a small amount of grief because we now, have a 9yo girl to look after, when I could be doing O/T. its not just about our jobs its about everyone's jobs. I don't attack other working people because they have longer holidays , better pensions , more pay etc , I support them.

[borders]

One might get the impression that the OP thinks the strike is the end in itself rather than a means to secure an improved offer. Indeed he seems angry at the prospect.

maybe he does , would you be happy with this ? a non- unionised workforce to completely exploit and push the profits up even further , you would love that , wouldn't you ?

As usual you completely miss the point.What on earth has this got to do with a non-unionised workforce? In principle I don't have a problem with a strike to support negotiations on terms and conditions of employment. It's when I read this sort of BS which implies that the purpose of the strike is to give RM, the Government or the "capitalist system" a bloody nose that I wonder if some people (including some posties) don't actually want there to be a settlement. I certainly wouldn't want to be losing a days pay for those people. What do you want?

what is your point ? there is always a BUT in your replies - In principle I don't have a problem with a strike BUT - I am on your side BUT blah blah blah , you are a wolf in sheep's clothing . in industrial terms , it is a fight. to not think so , denies that there is conflict between Labour and Capital in our society . I am prepared to lose a days pay for those people.

[Brain Fury]

One might get the impression that the OP thinks the strike is the end in itself rather than a means to secure an improved offer. Indeed he seems angry at the prospect.

maybe he does , would you be happy with this ? a non- unionised workforce to completely exploit and push the profits up even further , you would love that , wouldn't you ?

As usual you completely miss the point.What on earth has this got to do with a non-unionised workforce? In principle I don't have a problem with a strike to support negotiations on terms and conditions of employment. It's when I read this sort of BS which implies that the purpose of the strike is to give RM, the Government or the "capitalist system" a bloody nose that I wonder if some people (including some posties) don't actually want there to be a settlement. I certainly wouldn't want to be losing a days pay for those people. What do you want?

what is your point ? there is always a BUT in your replies - In principle I don't have a problem with a strike BUT - I am on your side BUT blah blah blah , you are a wolf in sheep's clothing . in industrial terms , it is a fight. to not think so , denies that there is conflict between Labour and Capital in our society . I am prepared to lose a days pay for those people.

There wasn't a single "but" in my previous post! I should have thought was the point obvious - I was highlighting that the OP seems more interested in striking for it's own sake, as part of the "conflict between labour and capital" than actually reaching a settlement with RM on pay and conditions. The fact that the OP is a CWU rep makes me wonder if he / she is really worried about members interests or is simply spoiling for a rather pointless ideological fight? No doubt you will say it's both but I'm not so sure. You seem to think that losing a days pay will somehow help other people in other organisations. It won't. I am still not clear whether you would be disappointed if there was a settlement before 4th November.

[Tman]

His point is very clear to me, and makes perfect sense too.
I don't go along with all the cobblers "this is about Capitalism vs the Labour, etc etc", and speaking to the average RM employee, they don't give two wossnames for all that old Wolfie Smith clap-trap either.
This strike is (allegedly) about future terms and conditions, not another rehash of Class War or fought for the stale political beliefs of a few.
Personally I think the CWU were out-smarted by the government over privatisation and now have to give it the big 'uns to save face with it's membership, the problem being that there doesn't seem much real appetite for a strike, and so if "not enough" employees strike then the perceived power of the CWU will be weakened in the eyes of the new incoming "ownership".

To propose that any firm would/will guarantee T&Cs for X number of years is naive to say the least. Even the three years on offer is more than generous, when many employees merely get told, "three months notice that you're now on this rate of pay or this new contract, etc".
Choose your fights, as the old maxim goes.

[Brain Fury]

... all that old Wolfie Smith clap-trap either.

[borders]

you didn't say BUT in any of your posts , I know that but you come across as the sort of person that we have all met and by way of an example " I am not a Capitalist BUT just as long as the working class know their place...... " get my drift ? no , ok I will move on from that . the rest of your post proves to me , we are from the other sides of the fence , we will never agree ....