ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Biased CWU

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
brothermagrew
Posts: 3015
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 16:38
Gender: Male
Location: Shares a border with England to the south.

Re: Biased CWU

Post by brothermagrew »

gluteus maximus wrote:If i might respond. The issue of Scottish independence is a matter for no one else but the people who live and work north or the border. There should be no corporate, political, or organizational interference unless it it from the people of Scotland themselves. Who are we to say they are not grown up enough to run their own affairs? Has the English Parliament done any better. There has to be a better way, and i am talking as an Englishman, not Scottish
Bro should point out that in the Treaty of Union Article 3 provide for the creation of the one, unified, parliament of Great Britain. Not English Parliament as you suggest.

The united Kingdom of Great Britain was born on 1 May 1707, shortly after the parliaments of Scotland and England had ratified the Treaty of Union by each approving Acts of Union combining the two parliaments and the two royal titles.
"Today’s workplace has become heartless and soulless. Employees are seen as units of labour, automatons, functionaries, objects for achieving designated tasks, and as costs to be minimised."
brothermagrew
Posts: 3015
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 16:38
Gender: Male
Location: Shares a border with England to the south.

Re: Biased CWU

Post by brothermagrew »

An interesting article published today by the Business for Scotland website entitled Why the No campaign REALLY don't want a Scottish oil fund

http://www.businessforscotland.co.uk/wh ... -oil-fund/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Today’s workplace has become heartless and soulless. Employees are seen as units of labour, automatons, functionaries, objects for achieving designated tasks, and as costs to be minimised."
mailman71
Posts: 500
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 08:03

Re: Biased CWU

Post by mailman71 »

The bookies up here will give you big odds on a yes vote.
borders
Posts: 1304
Joined: 11 Sep 2007, 09:10

Re: Biased CWU

Post by borders »

brothermagrew wrote:An interesting article published today by the Business for Scotland website entitled Why the No campaign REALLY don't want a Scottish oil fund

http://www.businessforscotland.co.uk/wh ... -oil-fund/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
an excellent , eye opening and persuasive article. if i were a Scot , it would be a yes vote from me and I hope that Scotland can become that healthy, prosperous, more equal and productive nation with a fully funded pension fund and have a real voice in world affairs .
"why should it just be the bankers, politicians and the idle rich who get all the best things ? we demand a standard of living for our members that enables them to share in the fine wines and times that the likes of Cameron and his Eton buddies take for granted " - the late great Bob Crow RIP.
cloherty1976
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 1236
Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 12:16
Gender: Male
Location: The south

Re: Biased CWU

Post by cloherty1976 »

mailman71 wrote:The bookies up here will give you big odds on a yes vote.
Surely you mean short odds as I thought you were voting yes for independance.Maybe I got it wrong!
Last edited by cloherty1976 on 15 Oct 2013, 13:29, edited 1 time in total.
borders
Posts: 1304
Joined: 11 Sep 2007, 09:10

Re: Biased CWU

Post by borders »

they are referring to the Scottish Independence vote .
"why should it just be the bankers, politicians and the idle rich who get all the best things ? we demand a standard of living for our members that enables them to share in the fine wines and times that the likes of Cameron and his Eton buddies take for granted " - the late great Bob Crow RIP.
cloherty1976
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 1236
Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 12:16
Gender: Male
Location: The south

Re: Biased CWU

Post by cloherty1976 »

borders wrote:they are referring to the Scottish Independence vote .
Thank you borders corrected above not really followed this but I thought it was a lot closer but mailman is correct :oops: