Rival site can't even rig their own poll !!!

PrestwickPostie · Post by **PrestwickPostie** » 01 Oct 2007, 21:24

norbet colon wrote: more bans from the friendly informal site with a atmosphere more akin to a lounge according to Hellmail , getting laughable now

the guy that runs hell mail is a knob ... you only have to read his site to come to that conclusion

DirtyHarry · Post by **DirtyHarry** » 01 Oct 2007, 21:41

Aaaaahhh , POSTMANSHAT. Have the idiots that run it, Johnboy & Mary Poppins, pulled the old "Oh, I've had enough of this, I'm pulling the plug
on this site, you lot obviously don't like the way I run it", routine again? They must have pulled that stunt at least 3 times in the short period I was on
there, and would only "relent" once the the other fawning idiots would post their "please don't" messages. It wasn't too long after I'd posted a, "maybe
that might not be a bad idea, as you're clearly unsuited to run a topical forum for posties, especially in the current climate" message, that I got my
marching orders.

They don't like it up 'em, on postmanSHAT.

DirtyHarry · Post by **DirtyHarry** » 01 Oct 2007, 22:31

Well , well , well , there would appear to be a discrepancy on postmanSHAT. According to their stats, there are 40,488 posts in total. But if you
add up the counts in their individual forums, it comes to 28,826 posts altogether. That's 12,000 odd posts unaccounted for, hmmmm, now far be it from
me to cast aspersions as to why this may be, so I'll just put it down to down to them having a dodgy abacus, and being typical RM management material.

norbet colon · Post by **norbet colon** » 02 Oct 2007, 21:44

DirtyHarry wrote:Well , well , well , there would appear to be a discrepancy on postmanSHAT. According to their stats, there are 40,488 posts in total. But if you
add up the counts in their individual forums, it comes to 28,826 posts altogether. That's 12,000 odd posts unaccounted for, hmmmm, now far be it from
me to cast aspersions as to why this may be, so I'll just put it down to down to them having a dodgy abacus, and being typical RM management material.

new poll -would a full disclosure of RM's Financial Position have influenced your vote ?

DirtyHarry · Post by **DirtyHarry** » 02 Oct 2007, 23:03

norbet colon wrote: new poll -would a full disclosure of RM's Financial Position have influenced your vote ?

Hmmmmm, now let me see, would I willingly let myself be reduced to paupery because Royal Mail's two resident clowns at the top couldn't
run a piss-up in a brewery, let alone be expected to run a huge concern like Britain's postal service?

No, that'd be my answer with a suitable post attached.

Wild Rover · Post by **Wild Rover** » 02 Oct 2007, 23:14

I seem to recall H*ll Mail had a temporarily shut website recently.

Wouldn't be surprised if they've flushed out all the posts that went against their website ethics, along with the members who dared even question...hmmm

Post by **TrueBlueTerrier** » 03 Oct 2007, 16:41

DirtyHarry wrote:Well , well , well , there would appear to be a discrepancy on postmanSHAT. According to their stats, there are 40,488 posts in total. But if you
add up the counts in their individual forums, it comes to 28,826 posts altogether. That's 12,000 odd posts unaccounted for, hmmmm, now far be it from
me to cast aspersions as to why this may be, so I'll just put it down to down to them having a dodgy abacus, and being typical RM management material.

Well SA was asked how many posts he had deleted guess we know the answer now. Busy lad.

postie28 · Post by **postie28** » 03 Oct 2007, 16:52

PrestwickPostie wrote:
norbet colon wrote: more bans from the friendly informal site with a atmosphere more akin to a lounge according to Hellmail , getting laughable now
the guy that runs hell mail is a knob ... you only have to read his site to come to that conclusion

been having a nosey round their site myself. not been banned yet. but working on it

Carla · Post by **Carla** » 03 Oct 2007, 17:06

Yeah i got banned a couple of weeks ago and i never even done anything in there SA and SLH you both should be ashamed of yourself a f***ing shite site run by pro RM hitler style rules no wonder it going downhill lmao time to hang up your gloves

postie28 · Post by **postie28** » 03 Oct 2007, 18:35

just seen a comment on there about how many are working through strike. one numpty said he didn't know as he was trying to keep quiet about working himself.called him the worst type of s*** going . banned for life within seconds.

PrestwickPostie · Post by **PrestwickPostie** » 03 Oct 2007, 18:36

postie28 wrote:
PrestwickPostie wrote:
norbet colon wrote: more bans from the friendly informal site with a atmosphere more akin to a lounge according to Hellmail , getting laughable now
the guy that runs hell mail is a knob ... you only have to read his site to come to that conclusion

been having a nosey round their site myself. not been banned yet. but working on it

yep trying my part again under my new username FuNsTeR as "PrestwickPostie" was banned

Post by **TrueBlueTerrier** » 03 Oct 2007, 18:51

PrestwickPostie wrote:
postie28 wrote:
PrestwickPostie wrote:
norbet colon wrote: more bans from the friendly informal site with a atmosphere more akin to a lounge according to Hellmail , getting laughable now
the guy that runs hell mail is a knob ... you only have to read his site to come to that conclusion

been having a nosey round their site myself. not been banned yet. but working on it
yep trying my part again under my new username ****** as "PrestwickPostie" was banned

If thats your real moniker on that site hide it quick as they spy on us.

PrestwickPostie · Post by **PrestwickPostie** » 03 Oct 2007, 18:54

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
PrestwickPostie wrote:
postie28 wrote:
PrestwickPostie wrote:
norbet colon wrote: more bans from the friendly informal site with a atmosphere more akin to a lounge according to Hellmail , getting laughable now
the guy that runs hell mail is a knob ... you only have to read his site to come to that conclusion

been having a nosey round their site myself. not been banned yet. but working on it
yep trying my part again under my new username ****** as "PrestwickPostie" was banned
If thats your real moniker on that site hide it quick as they spy on us.

they can spy all they want ... i couldn't care less if they do ban me

DirtyHarry · Post by **DirtyHarry** » 03 Oct 2007, 20:16

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
DirtyHarry wrote:Well , well , well , there would appear to be a discrepancy on postmanSHAT. According to their stats, there are 40,488 posts in total. But if you
add up the counts in their individual forums, it comes to 28,826 posts altogether. That's 12,000 odd posts unaccounted for, hmmmm, now far be it from
me to cast aspersions as to why this may be, so I'll just put it down to down to them having a dodgy abacus, and being typical RM management material.
Well SA was asked how many posts he had deleted guess we know the answer now. Busy lad.

Goodness gracious, Holmes, you might be right. By the way Holmes, SA, is that his initials, and is he really the ghastly professor
Short Arse ?

norbet colon · Post by **norbet colon** » 04 Oct 2007, 16:48

DirtyHarry wrote:
TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
DirtyHarry wrote:Well , well , well , there would appear to be a discrepancy on postmanSHAT. According to their stats, there are 40,488 posts in total. But if you
add up the counts in their individual forums, it comes to 28,826 posts altogether. That's 12,000 odd posts unaccounted for, hmmmm, now far be it from
me to cast aspersions as to why this may be, so I'll just put it down to down to them having a dodgy abacus, and being typical RM management material.
Well SA was asked how many posts he had deleted guess we know the answer now. Busy lad.
Goodness gracious, Holmes, you might be right. By the way Holmes, SA, is that his initials, and is he really the ghastly professor
Short Arse ?

ROYALMAILCHAT

Rival site can't even rig their own poll !!!

Re: not another ban !?

Re: not another ban !?

Re: not another ban !?

Re: not another ban !?

Re: not another ban !?

"Our People" have spoken LOL