Newent businessman loses postcode court battle with Royal Mail
http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/ ... story.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
A Newent businessman has lost a court battle with the Royal Mail over a missing parcel - because the postcode was wrong by just a single character.
Graham Wright said his defeat hinged on a little-known piece of legislation which says compensation will only be paid if addresses are 100 per cent accurate.
The correct postcode should have finished 2HX but the parcel ended up with 2HK.
But Graham, 73, is still baffled by the case - and suspects it was the post office itself which blundered.
The saga began in August 2011 when Graham, who runs a small engineering firm, sent a specially-made component to a customer who he deals with several times a year.
He took it to his local post office in Newent and asked it to go special delivery to the address in Stockport, Cheshire.
But several days later his client rang and said the order - worth around £300 - had not arrived.
When puzzled Graham checked with the Royal Mail they told him it had been delivered and signed for by someone with an unusual name.
But the business expecting the parcel knew no-one by that name and the package disappeared.
Graham launched a complaint against the Royal Mail in a bid for compensation and went through six different levels before ending up in court.
He said: "At every level I was told 'We delivered your package' and I said 'You did - but to the wrong person'.
"They insisted they'd done what they were supposed to do so I took them to court."
The Royal Mail employed a legal team as the row finally reached a conciliation hearing before a judge in Gloucester last week.
Graham said the judge could not ignore the clause about addresses being absolutely correct before compensation could be paid.
The judge ordered the Royal Mail to pay their own costs, leaving Graham around £1,000 out of pocket including the value of the lost item.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Newent businessman loses postcode court battle with RM
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72621
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Newent businessman loses postcode court battle with RM
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
DGP1
- Posts: 15551
- Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
- Gender: Male
- Location: Terminus
Re: Newent businessman loses postcode court battle with RM
Wouldn't it have been better and cheaper for RM just to have paid out the £300?
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
-
TeeferTiger
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 2783
- Joined: 22 Dec 2008, 13:56
- Gender: Female
- Location: Welsh Wales
Re: Newent businessman loses postcode court battle with RM
So there are 2 streets with the same name in the SK?? postal area that have the slightly different but similar looking postcodes? 
Does this rag smell of chloroform to you?