ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

OFFICES WITH A FAILING REVISION:LIST

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: OFFICES WITH A FAILING REVISION:LIST

Post by fishtank »

In 2009 London said if any of our offices were attacked we would all ballot and we did and took 20 days of action it's called a union for a reason
By our offices i take it you mean London offices and as far as i'm aware London is not called a union.
This isn't a London thing it's a fragmentation of the union thing and the ridiculous idea that we can defend,protect or build a union on the basis of having strong and weak areas.

Do you honestly believe that members should just accept the fact that they were unlucky enough to be born into a weak area and accept poorer terms and conditions but still stump up the same subs or even continue to be part of an increasingly two tier union.

Do you honestly believe that weak areas will somehow get stronger by looking over the fence at stronger areas,that's the most ludicrous suggestion because all experience points to the exact opposite.

Most importantly do you honestly believe that when the need arrives to come together as one united force that members will want to fight for better terms and conditions they may never see because they come from weak areas.

Exactly the same thing exists up here where the East Coast believes it's stronger than the West Coast.
The truth is both areas are getting weaker because no-one can see the big picture mainly because they are too busy looking after number one.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: OFFICES WITH A FAILING REVISION:LIST

Post by dvbuk55 »

Yes dingo you never seem to weary of mentioning the 20 days action you took, failing to mention that it produced no results until the NATIONAL union joined the fray..........what was a NATIONAL initiative, suddenly became a London Division CWU Agreement initiative and those from Lunnun took an active part in making sure that the agreement went through...............then waited almost three years to start implementing it.
whatamess!!
Posts: 279
Joined: 13 Jan 2011, 17:43
Gender: Female

Re: OFFICES WITH A FAILING REVISION:LIST

Post by whatamess!! »

Dingo

Could I ask you a question?

Of the 50% of offices which revisions have come in so far, are the members using trolleys? Having breaks? coming in at their scheduled start time? Have cars been stopped being used?

If the the answer is yes, I would ask how you have got members to change their ways of working, as the rest of the country seems to be having major problems with this.

If the answers are no, then I would say that these are failed revisions.

Many thanks

Keep up the good work.
newtimes
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 595
Joined: 16 Feb 2012, 14:10
Gender: Male

Re: OFFICES WITH A FAILING REVISION:LIST

Post by newtimes »

sgt,rock wrote:Dingo, our rep comes in early and doesn't have a break. About as much good as a chocolate teapot.
Our rep comes in early and has many breaks and always finishes on time all year round. About as much good as a chocolate teapot. :roll:
Martin Walsh
Posts: 4256
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
Location: neverland

Re: OFFICES WITH A FAILING REVISION:LIST

Post by Martin Walsh »

There are well over a thousand delivery reps who have a very hard job and lots have little support from members , Branch's , CWU HQs and have a hard time with managers.

Sure out of that 1000 there are good and bad and I agree they should try and set the example. However ii is voluntary job and you can decide to stand against them and set the example. The problem is too many are happy to moan and post stuff about their rep but are not willing to do th job. That is the way a lot of us got into a reps postion we though we could do better and the members deserved better.

So come on instead of talking about tea Pots make a difference. let's see if you can do better.
newtimes
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 595
Joined: 16 Feb 2012, 14:10
Gender: Male

Re: OFFICES WITH A FAILING REVISION:LIST

Post by newtimes »

dingo wrote:There are well over a thousand delivery reps who have a very hard job and lots have little support from members , Branch's , CWU HQs and have a hard time with managers.

Sure out of that 1000 there are good and bad and I agree they should try and set the example. However ii is voluntary job and you can decide to stand against them and set the example. The problem is too many are happy to moan and post stuff about their rep but are not willing to do th job. That is the way a lot of us got into a reps postion we though we could do better and the members deserved better.

So come on instead of talking about tea Pots make a difference. let's see if you can do better.
How do you stand against them, where I work, theres a % who will not join the union, % who have left the union, % who avoid any conflict, % who are in the reps tribe and finaly the remaining % who are in the minority. Sure there are many many great reps but not where I work. This is my fault for not finding out, so I will ask now, can I attend branch meetings, and what meetings can I attend and where can I find out about whats happening without going through my rep. How can you become active within the CWU.
Danelectro
Posts: 1058
Joined: 13 Apr 2008, 01:02

Re: OFFICES WITH A FAILING REVISION:LIST

Post by Danelectro »

dingo wrote: Sure out of that 1000 there are good and bad and I agree they should try and set the example. However ii is voluntary job and you can decide to stand against them and set the example.
I take his point if its the unit rep whose letting the side down and not setting a good example, then true stand against them, get elected and its sorted but if its an area rep or branch not functioning then trying to get them to buck up is a totally different ball game.

Yeah the Reps at all levels are voluntary but as pointed out branches spend a fortune shuttling area reps(with generous expenses) up and down the country so there needs to be accountability or at least feedback from the meetings they attend,which is not happening .I dont think these people are all bad,think many have lost their way and since the last agreement they seem to be bluffing their way through some shady negotiating either with or without HQs knowledge.

I also dont buy the shuffling of feet theory after 2 days of national action,never got that impression on the picket line.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72430
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: OFFICES WITH A FAILING REVISION:LIST

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

dingo wrote:So come on instead of talking about tea Pots make a difference. let's see if you can do better.
:Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Martin Walsh
Posts: 4256
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
Location: neverland

Re: OFFICES WITH A FAILING REVISION:LIST

Post by Martin Walsh »

dan after the first strike there was a briefing and a conference call of all Branch`s. We also had the percetages of people who went into work in areas.

Believe me there was some areas in trouble. However there were strong areas as well. Dont be surprised it happens in most disputes. I remember in 1996 employee agenda dispute a certain mayor in york who was also a cwu rep calling for a reballot after the second day of action. Evenutally we had to reballot due to a balls up and got a second yes vote.
scooby
Posts: 287
Joined: 23 May 2007, 20:45
Gender: Male
Location: lost some where.....

Re: OFFICES WITH A FAILING REVISION:LIST

Post by scooby »

been in over a year now planners never came back to sort the shite out only way it works is not using the trolleys and no brakes and still get it in the neck from managers when we can not get round and leave bags or packets.

mind you the best bit is some get back about 11.30 then take the bags out on overtime and still get home before me
newtimes
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 595
Joined: 16 Feb 2012, 14:10
Gender: Male

Re: OFFICES WITH A FAILING REVISION:LIST

Post by newtimes »

scooby wrote:been in over a year now planners never came back to sort the shite out only way it works is not using the trolleys and no brakes and still get it in the neck from managers when we can not get round and leave bags or packets.

mind you the best bit is some get back about 11.30 then take the bags out on overtime and still get home before me
are they going out early
scooby
Posts: 287
Joined: 23 May 2007, 20:45
Gender: Male
Location: lost some where.....

Re: OFFICES WITH A FAILING REVISION:LIST

Post by scooby »

some times they sneak out but not all the time the walks are just not even was ment to be a 6 week trial then planers re do the walks but they just left and never came back
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: OFFICES WITH A FAILING REVISION:LIST

Post by DGP1 »

scooby wrote:some times they sneak out but not all the time the walks are just not even was ment to be a 6 week trial then planers re do the walks but they just left and never came back
Which is why we wont agree to the proposed revisions, they wont work and they wont come back to fix them............get them right the first time and there wont be any problems.
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32639
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: OFFICES WITH A FAILING REVISION:LIST

Post by POSTMAN »

Been here before said it before,Sid or Sarah may know every agreement in the book,every I dotted and every T crossed,but is not up to public speaking or confrontation.
I'm sure many want to help or go for it but are unable due to their make up.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: OFFICES WITH A FAILING REVISION:LIST

Post by fishtank »

POSTMAN wrote:Been here before said it before,Sid or Sarah may know every agreement in the book,every I dotted and every T crossed,but is not up to public speaking or confrontation.
I'm sure many want to help or go for it but are unable due to their make up.
If you do it right it eats into your free time and family life as well,if you have young kids it will probably get mentioned in the divorce papers.
My wife's a saint...or she doesn't give a toss...either/or delete as applicable. :neutral:
good times, bad times you know I've had my share