By our offices i take it you mean London offices and as far as i'm aware London is not called a union.In 2009 London said if any of our offices were attacked we would all ballot and we did and took 20 days of action it's called a union for a reason
This isn't a London thing it's a fragmentation of the union thing and the ridiculous idea that we can defend,protect or build a union on the basis of having strong and weak areas.
Do you honestly believe that members should just accept the fact that they were unlucky enough to be born into a weak area and accept poorer terms and conditions but still stump up the same subs or even continue to be part of an increasingly two tier union.
Do you honestly believe that weak areas will somehow get stronger by looking over the fence at stronger areas,that's the most ludicrous suggestion because all experience points to the exact opposite.
Most importantly do you honestly believe that when the need arrives to come together as one united force that members will want to fight for better terms and conditions they may never see because they come from weak areas.
Exactly the same thing exists up here where the East Coast believes it's stronger than the West Coast.
The truth is both areas are getting weaker because no-one can see the big picture mainly because they are too busy looking after number one.