ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

"Big Announcement" Tuesday 4th December

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: "Big Announcement" Tuesday 4th December

Post by dvbuk55 »

sgt,rock wrote:If that is the announcement and we were instructed to handle the mail and then a delivery officer is suspended for refusing, what next?
That would depend on where it was and who it was.
stokes11eg
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3077
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 12:51
Gender: Female

Re: "Big Announcement" Tuesday 4th December

Post by stokes11eg »

:Very Happy
dvbuk55 wrote:Don't worry the CWU will be having a christmas bash alright and at the memberships expense, however in accordance with cutting expense it will only be cheap caviar but the champers will still be top dollar. :cuppa
:Very Happy And only the most expensive pork pies!
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: "Big Announcement" Tuesday 4th December

Post by dvbuk55 »

stokes11eg wrote::Very Happy
dvbuk55 wrote:Don't worry the CWU will be having a christmas bash alright and at the memberships expense, however in accordance with cutting expense it will only be cheap caviar but the champers will still be top dollar. :cuppa
:Very Happy And only the most expensive pork pies!
I think you meant porky pies - with the salaries they're on :chuckle
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: "Big Announcement" Tuesday 4th December

Post by fishtank »

sgt,rock wrote:If that is the announcement and we were instructed to handle the mail and then a delivery officer is suspended for refusing, what next?
Having been placed in a similar situation with mail diverted from an office involved in industrial action the next step would usually be on with the jackets and off to the gate.
Or is that a bit too militant for some? :cuppa
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: "Big Announcement" Tuesday 4th December

Post by dvbuk55 »

fishtank wrote:
sgt,rock wrote:If that is the announcement and we were instructed to handle the mail and then a delivery officer is suspended for refusing, what next?
Having been placed in a similar situation with mail diverted from an office involved in industrial action the next step would usually be on with the jackets and off to the gate.
Or is that a bit too militant for some? :cuppa
I think it IS too militant for some - our office has walked on two occasions but not in the last 7 years, even though I believe there has been at least one occasion when it was justified. There no longer appears to be a unified atmosphere in the DO, like there was some years ago - some are obviously driven because of their personal financial constraints which they put above all else and in this day and age perhaps that is understandable to some extent particularly with the short term part time contracts. The last time we walked was when a member was told to do something when we were in dispute - he refused, was suspended and everyone walked.................I just wonder if given the same circumstances that would apply today...........I'm not really a betting man but I don't think they would.
whatamess!!
Posts: 279
Joined: 13 Jan 2011, 17:43
Gender: Female

Re: "Big Announcement" Tuesday 4th December

Post by whatamess!! »

Boycotting DSA for one day would be a joke, the delivery postie would get hammered the next day .
I really believe that boycotting DSA is just a way of starting a national strike, postie will start getting suspended for wilful delay and offices would walk out all over the country in support, Or would they? But that I believe is the many objective of boycotting DSA.
DB1100
Posts: 1976
Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 14:30

Re: "Big Announcement" Tuesday 4th December

Post by DB1100 »

Maybe they are going to self immolate in protest.
For we were soldiers once,and young
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: "Big Announcement" Tuesday 4th December

Post by fishtank »

whatamess!! wrote:Boycotting DSA for one day would be a joke.
I think boycotting it for one day would be a statement...nothing more,not designed to screw up the pipeline but to bring attention to the issue,that's why they will announce it at this conference tomorrow in front of Moya and the boss of TNT.
I also think if Royal mail believed it was only for one day they would probably step back from suspending members and escalating the issue.

The union is in a tricky position over DSA,legally and from the point of view that the whole idea is to discourage end to end cherry picking not encourage it by forcing competitors to deliver more of their own.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: "Big Announcement" Tuesday 4th December

Post by dvbuk55 »

fishtank wrote:
whatamess!! wrote:Boycotting DSA for one day would be a joke.
I think boycotting it for one day would be a statement...nothing more,not designed to screw up the pipeline but to bring attention to the issue,that's why they will announce it at this conference tomorrow in front of Moya and the boss of TNT.
I also think if Royal mail believed it was only for one day they would probably step back from suspending members and escalating the issue.

The union is in a tricky position over DSA,legally and from the point of view that the whole idea is to discourage end to end cherry picking not encourage it by forcing competitors to deliver more of their own.
You may be right ft, but what exactly is the statement? It is quite a strange move probably at a time when DSA will be at a low volume anyway due to christmas.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: "Big Announcement" Tuesday 4th December

Post by fishtank »

dvbuk55 wrote:You may be right ft, but what exactly is the statement? It is quite a strange move probably at a time when DSA will be at a low volume anyway due to christmas.
I'm quite surprised by it as well DV.
It's fraught with issues and potential dangers for the union.
Is it covered as a "trades dispute"?
It might be,it might not,personally i would doubt it.
Is there adequate legal protection for members from breach of contract?
Is the union protected from legal action from the likes of TNT?
Is the pay off from one day worth the risk?
It's dodgy stuff.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: "Big Announcement" Tuesday 4th December

Post by dvbuk55 »

fishtank wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:You may be right ft, but what exactly is the statement? It is quite a strange move probably at a time when DSA will be at a low volume anyway due to christmas.
I'm quite surprised by it as well DV.
It's fraught with issues and potential dangers for the union.
Is it covered as a "trades dispute"?
It might be,it might not,personally i would doubt it.
Is there adequate legal protection for members from breach of contract?
Is the union protected from legal action from the likes of TNT?
Is the pay off from one day worth the risk?
It's dodgy stuff.
I don't know if the date has been chosen and if there's any wiggle room but I would hope so for exactly the reasons you highlight. What on earth would the boycott do to adress the real problems we face under BT2010. I ask myself if this a real issue or merely smoke and mirrors to lull the troops into thinking that there is still some life in the old dog.
whatamess!!
Posts: 279
Joined: 13 Jan 2011, 17:43
Gender: Female

Re: "Big Announcement" Tuesday 4th December

Post by whatamess!! »

fishtank wrote:
whatamess!! wrote:Boycotting DSA for one day would be a joke.
I think boycotting it for one day would be a statement...nothing more,not designed to screw up the pipeline but to bring attention to the issue,that's why they will announce it at this conference tomorrow in front of Moya and the boss of TNT.
I also think if Royal mail believed it was only for one day they would probably step back from suspending members and escalating the issue.

The union is in a tricky position over DSA,legally and from the point of view that the whole idea is to discourage end to end cherry picking not encourage it by forcing competitors to deliver more of their own.
I agree it is a statement of intent, but to the members in delivery it will be laughed upon. So much remains un-answered, if we don't take out DSA for one day, what do members do to work their remaining hours for that day? Royal mail may be quite happy as it gives them chance to catch up on packets. The day after members will be under real pressure to catch up. Members in delivery will look at this as a lose - lose situation.
Lounge Lizard
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 9458
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54

Re: "Big Announcement" Tuesday 4th December

Post by Lounge Lizard »

fishtank wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:You may be right ft, but what exactly is the statement? It is quite a strange move probably at a time when DSA will be at a low volume anyway due to christmas.
I'm quite surprised by it as well DV.
It's fraught with issues and potential dangers for the union.
Is it covered as a "trades dispute"?
It might be,it might not,personally i would doubt it.
Is there adequate legal protection for members from breach of contract?
Is the union protected from legal action from the likes of TNT?
Is the pay off from one day worth the risk?
It's dodgy stuff.
Dodgy indeed.
Not so much boycotting DSA but delaying it for a day, which I don't see how the CWU could defend as being other than 'Wilful Delay'. :shock:
Some members suspended for 'Wilful Delay' and what sort of defence would the CWU give, it was okay because we told them to do it ? :shock:
Or am I missing something ? :shock:
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72719
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: "Big Announcement" Tuesday 4th December

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Worst of all, at least in my mind, is that this is a Political stunt and I can't see Delivery members backing a boycott call by the gliteratti unless or until they see positive moves in the issues that face them daily.

Are delivery members really going to put their jobs on the line, even if its sold as a defence of their current pay and conditions or to stop future attacks, especially when some honestly see them as under constant attack for the last 2 years with little or no visible movement from HQ.

Its going to be a real hard sell, even among us "Militants".
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: "Big Announcement" Tuesday 4th December

Post by dvbuk55 »

Has it happened yet or has there been second thoughts?