ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Lynne Featherstone writes… Royal Mail plans fail to deliver!
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72741
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Lynne Featherstone writes… Royal Mail plans fail to deliver!
http://www.libdemvoice.org/lynne-feathe ... 31778.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
International Development minister Lynne Featherstone writes a monthly column for one of her local newspapers. Here is the latest one…..
When I get in and find a little card saying ‘we tried to deliver but you were out’ – I am always annoyed – because it means extra bother. Currently that bother is either re-organising delivery on another day, organising for it to go to a neighbour or popping into Archway Road post office to collect it at my convenience. With my schedule – only the last of those is a real possibility. But that small bother is about to get a whole lot worse!
So imagine how cross I was (on both my own behalf and of course everyone who will be affected) when in September I caught wind of Royal Mail plans to relocate sorting offices (where registered post and parcels usually go) in North London. Our local sorting office services in Hornsey, Harringay and Highgate are under threat.
This is a big deal. The average volume of parcels and mail returned to each office when a customer is not at home stands at 278 items per day. Thousands of local residents will be affected.
Three sorting offices in North London are being relocated. Hornsey sorting office is being closed and the staff and services are moving to N19. Another office on Green Lanes in N4 is also closing – with services being moved to an industrial estate near Tufnell Park. Highgate sorting office, which is currently based in the Upper Holloway office, will also move to the new site near Tufnell Park.
In Highgate, we residents are used to picking up undelivered parcels from the post office on Archway Road. As part of the reorganisation, the free collection point at Archway Road may be withdrawn. Instead, Highgate residents would have to travel to Tufnell Park – or alternatively pay a £1.50 charge per item to pick up their undelivered parcels and post from Archway Road. In short, as the journey to Tufnell Park is not feasible for many Highgate residents, Royal Mail will rather cynically start charging for a service which is currently free.
For Hornsey residents, instead of picking up undelivered parcels and post from the conveniently located sorting office by the station, they will have to take two or three buses – or drive – to N19 to collect them. Residents that use the Green Lanes office will face a similar problem.
The problem is that, in this day and age, very few of us have a spare hour or two in the day to travel to pick up our parcels. It is also incredibly impractical – how will parents with small children or the elderly be able to make the journey and carry heavy parcels back home?
So – I called an urgent meeting with Royal Mail. I requested that they meet with me and Lib Dem Councillors from the affected areas. We represented all of these concerns – but unfortunately Royal Mail was unmoved. They responded to me a few weeks after the meeting, saying they would be going ahead with the relocations, and would consider whether or not to keep the free collection service at Archway Road.
So we have decided to step things up. Haringey Liberal Democrats and I are determined to show Royal Mail the strength of opinion on their proposed changes. As part of our campaign, we’ve started petitions, which local residents can add their names to.
We’re calling on Royal Mail to keep our collection services local. This means that, even if they relocate the sorting office, they should create or retain free local collection points – so that we do not have to travel ridiculous and impractical distances to pick up our undelivered parcels and mail.
In January, I’ll be calling another meeting with Royal Mail, and presenting these petitions to them. The more signatures we have, the better chance we have of getting them to change their minds. We already have over 1200 signatures for Hornsey!
I’m certainly not anti-modernisation. Royal Mail should move with the times and look to make their business more efficient and sustainable – but if the current plans go ahead, there will certainly be more losers than winners. It is vital that we convince Royal Mail to take another look at their plans, and adapt them to ensure that we do not lose out.
International Development minister Lynne Featherstone writes a monthly column for one of her local newspapers. Here is the latest one…..
When I get in and find a little card saying ‘we tried to deliver but you were out’ – I am always annoyed – because it means extra bother. Currently that bother is either re-organising delivery on another day, organising for it to go to a neighbour or popping into Archway Road post office to collect it at my convenience. With my schedule – only the last of those is a real possibility. But that small bother is about to get a whole lot worse!
So imagine how cross I was (on both my own behalf and of course everyone who will be affected) when in September I caught wind of Royal Mail plans to relocate sorting offices (where registered post and parcels usually go) in North London. Our local sorting office services in Hornsey, Harringay and Highgate are under threat.
This is a big deal. The average volume of parcels and mail returned to each office when a customer is not at home stands at 278 items per day. Thousands of local residents will be affected.
Three sorting offices in North London are being relocated. Hornsey sorting office is being closed and the staff and services are moving to N19. Another office on Green Lanes in N4 is also closing – with services being moved to an industrial estate near Tufnell Park. Highgate sorting office, which is currently based in the Upper Holloway office, will also move to the new site near Tufnell Park.
In Highgate, we residents are used to picking up undelivered parcels from the post office on Archway Road. As part of the reorganisation, the free collection point at Archway Road may be withdrawn. Instead, Highgate residents would have to travel to Tufnell Park – or alternatively pay a £1.50 charge per item to pick up their undelivered parcels and post from Archway Road. In short, as the journey to Tufnell Park is not feasible for many Highgate residents, Royal Mail will rather cynically start charging for a service which is currently free.
For Hornsey residents, instead of picking up undelivered parcels and post from the conveniently located sorting office by the station, they will have to take two or three buses – or drive – to N19 to collect them. Residents that use the Green Lanes office will face a similar problem.
The problem is that, in this day and age, very few of us have a spare hour or two in the day to travel to pick up our parcels. It is also incredibly impractical – how will parents with small children or the elderly be able to make the journey and carry heavy parcels back home?
So – I called an urgent meeting with Royal Mail. I requested that they meet with me and Lib Dem Councillors from the affected areas. We represented all of these concerns – but unfortunately Royal Mail was unmoved. They responded to me a few weeks after the meeting, saying they would be going ahead with the relocations, and would consider whether or not to keep the free collection service at Archway Road.
So we have decided to step things up. Haringey Liberal Democrats and I are determined to show Royal Mail the strength of opinion on their proposed changes. As part of our campaign, we’ve started petitions, which local residents can add their names to.
We’re calling on Royal Mail to keep our collection services local. This means that, even if they relocate the sorting office, they should create or retain free local collection points – so that we do not have to travel ridiculous and impractical distances to pick up our undelivered parcels and mail.
In January, I’ll be calling another meeting with Royal Mail, and presenting these petitions to them. The more signatures we have, the better chance we have of getting them to change their minds. We already have over 1200 signatures for Hornsey!
I’m certainly not anti-modernisation. Royal Mail should move with the times and look to make their business more efficient and sustainable – but if the current plans go ahead, there will certainly be more losers than winners. It is vital that we convince Royal Mail to take another look at their plans, and adapt them to ensure that we do not lose out.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
pinstripe
- Posts: 2474
- Joined: 25 May 2007, 16:42
- Gender: Male
- Location: 2 left turns from reality
Re: Lynne Featherstone writes… Royal Mail plans fail to deli
"I’m certainly not anti-modernisation. Royal Mail should move with the times and look to make their business more efficient and sustainable – but if the current plans go ahead, there will certainly be more losers than winners. It is vital that we convince Royal Mail to take another look at their plans, and adapt them to ensure that we do not lose out."
So we should "move with the times", be more "efficient and sustainable", just not when it affects this LibDem personally. Typical bloody politician.
So we should "move with the times", be more "efficient and sustainable", just not when it affects this LibDem personally. Typical bloody politician.
-
cyclemech1
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 334
- Joined: 20 Jul 2009, 20:46
- Gender: Male
Re: Lynne Featherstone writes… Royal Mail plans fail to deli
pinstripe wrote:"I’m certainly not anti-modernisation. Royal Mail should move with the times and look to make their business more efficient and sustainable – but if the current plans go ahead, there will certainly be more losers than winners. It is vital that we convince Royal Mail to take another look at their plans, and adapt them to ensure that we do not lose out."
So we should "move with the times", be more "efficient and sustainable", just not when it affects this LibDem personally. Typical bloody politician.
-
Lounge Lizard
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 9458
- Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54
Re: Lynne Featherstone writes… Royal Mail plans fail to deli
International Development minister Lynne Featherstone writes "With my schedule ...."
- but if one chooses to be International Development Minister then one must surely realise that that involves a busy schedule, not much time for going to collect a parcel, watching Countdown every afternoon, carefully ironing handkerchiefs, ....

- but if one chooses to be International Development Minister then one must surely realise that that involves a busy schedule, not much time for going to collect a parcel, watching Countdown every afternoon, carefully ironing handkerchiefs, ....
-
north london driver
- Posts: 560
- Joined: 18 Aug 2010, 21:51
- Gender: Male
Re: Lynne Featherstone writes… Royal Mail plans fail to deli
who is lynne featherstone does she really think royal mail are bothered with her.
there is nothing royal mail will listern to, there making cuts all over the country at the moment they are
condensing down offices to making savings or to sell land, soon will be crossborder walks will be introduced
to make more savings. royal mail will do what they want and are not intrested in there customers it is all about cuts
savings and profits.as for mrs featherstone get on with it, royal mail staff have been telling the public what has
been going on in our job for years but nobody could be bothered to listern.
there is nothing royal mail will listern to, there making cuts all over the country at the moment they are
condensing down offices to making savings or to sell land, soon will be crossborder walks will be introduced
to make more savings. royal mail will do what they want and are not intrested in there customers it is all about cuts
savings and profits.as for mrs featherstone get on with it, royal mail staff have been telling the public what has
been going on in our job for years but nobody could be bothered to listern.
-
RedBagMan
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: 01 Aug 2010, 17:53
- Gender: Male
- Location: Behind the lens
Re: Lynne Featherstone writes… Royal Mail plans fail to deli
Get a bigger bloody letter box then ... modernisation is a two-way process - isn't it ?
"We're under model" - oh no we're not - stick your lapse elsewhere ...
-
DGP1
- Posts: 15551
- Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
- Gender: Male
- Location: Terminus
Re: Lynne Featherstone writes… Royal Mail plans fail to deli
Not just that but if she's getting a lot of packages she might be better getting them sent to her officeRedBagMan wrote:Get a bigger bloody letter box then ... modernisation is a two-way process - isn't it ?
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
-
bluealbert
- Posts: 176
- Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 16:13
- Gender: Male
Re: Lynne Featherstone writes… Royal Mail plans fail to deli
Spot on matenorth london driver wrote:who is lynne featherstone does she really think royal mail are bothered with her.
there is nothing royal mail will listern to, there making cuts all over the country at the moment they are
condensing down offices to making savings or to sell land, soon will be crossborder walks will be introduced
to make more savings. royal mail will do what they want and are not intrested in there customers it is all about cuts
savings and profits.as for mrs featherstone get on with it, royal mail staff have been telling the public what has
been going on in our job for years but nobody could be bothered to listern.
-
Big Daz
- Posts: 5668
- Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
- Gender: Male
Re: Lynne Featherstone writes… Royal Mail plans fail to deli
RedBagMan wrote:Get a bigger bloody letter box then ... modernisation is a two-way process - isn't it ?
-
Lounge Lizard
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 9458
- Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54
Re: Lynne Featherstone writes… Royal Mail plans fail to deli
The following is from Lynne Featherstone's website and maybe most significant is :
Paid delivery: £6,208.75
Stamps: £2,088.72
Staffing Allowance: £102,758.88. I employ 1 full-time and 4 part-time staff.
The details of my expenses in 2008/9 are:
Salary: £66,207
Travel Expenses: £458
Additional Costs Allowance (ACA): nil
As a London MP I do not claim for a second home. I instead receive London weighting of £2,916, which is included in the salary figure.
Incidental Expense Allowance (Office Costs)
Office rent (inc. rates & electricity): £11,621.56
Misc. office costs: £2,858.67
Phone costs: £1,360.72
POLD services (paging services, central services): £903.50
Software maintenance: £573.00
PDA: £310.01
Total: £23,315.20
Note: £1,788.88 of intern expenses were billed under IEP. For clarity they have been reported under staffing allowance.
Communications Allowance
Paid delivery: £6,208.75
Stamps: £2,088.72
RISO lease: £2,100.00
Colour printing: £913.00
HoC Image: £5.88
Total: £11,316.35
Staffing Allowance: £102,758.88
I employ 1 full-time and 4 part-time staff. None of my employees are family members. Staffing costs include intern reimbursement for travel and lunch costs.

Paid delivery: £6,208.75
Stamps: £2,088.72
Staffing Allowance: £102,758.88. I employ 1 full-time and 4 part-time staff.
The details of my expenses in 2008/9 are:
Salary: £66,207
Travel Expenses: £458
Additional Costs Allowance (ACA): nil
As a London MP I do not claim for a second home. I instead receive London weighting of £2,916, which is included in the salary figure.
Incidental Expense Allowance (Office Costs)
Office rent (inc. rates & electricity): £11,621.56
Misc. office costs: £2,858.67
Phone costs: £1,360.72
POLD services (paging services, central services): £903.50
Software maintenance: £573.00
PDA: £310.01
Total: £23,315.20
Note: £1,788.88 of intern expenses were billed under IEP. For clarity they have been reported under staffing allowance.
Communications Allowance
Paid delivery: £6,208.75
Stamps: £2,088.72
RISO lease: £2,100.00
Colour printing: £913.00
HoC Image: £5.88
Total: £11,316.35
Staffing Allowance: £102,758.88
I employ 1 full-time and 4 part-time staff. None of my employees are family members. Staffing costs include intern reimbursement for travel and lunch costs.
-
north london driver
- Posts: 560
- Joined: 18 Aug 2010, 21:51
- Gender: Male
Re: Lynne Featherstone writes… Royal Mail plans fail to deli
so lynne featherstone has 1 full-timer,4 part-timers working for her yet none of them can go and
collect her mail.how about getting the mail sent to her office.
collect her mail.how about getting the mail sent to her office.
-
postwoman1
- Posts: 18
- Joined: 13 Oct 2012, 17:08
- Gender: Female
Re: Lynne Featherstone writes… Royal Mail plans fail to deli
Yes I totally agree. I'm sick of people complaining about P739 cards......leave a note for the postie...leave in green house/garage etc OR donot order stuff on the internet. Then on the other hand people complain if you DO leave packets ''in the green house''.......so what are we to do, can't do right for doing wrongRedBagMan wrote:Get a bigger bloody letter box then ... modernisation is a two-way process - isn't it ?