NWpostie wrote:
It would be the GP that decides if they have a blue badge in which case they would be entitled to it according to local rules, not Joe Public,
With all due respect NWPostie you are commenting on a system of which you appear to have a dearth of knowledge. The GP has no decision making powers in the Blue Badge system at all.
If people don't qualify automatically then the local authority make the decision.
Certain Groups Qualify Automatically: Anyone over two years old automatically qualifies for a Blue Badge if they:
are registered blind
receive a War Pensioner’s Mobility supplement
receive the higher rate of the mobility component of Disability Living Allowance
have received a lump sum benefit from the Armed Forces and Reserve Forces Compensation Scheme (within tariff levels 1-8) and have been certified as having a permanent and substantial disability which causes inability to walk or very considerable difficulty in walking
NWpostie wrote: I still think its not being used by the right people if they are driving top of the range cars, in my experience most disabled are not that rich except for a small proportion that got lucky, most tend to drive medium sized cars that don't so much to run. DLA only goes so far..
You don't get a Blue Badge just because you get DLA (higher), you can also qualify for a Blue Badge and not claim DLA. It is entirely possible that someone who can afford to buy a "Top of the Range Car", refuses to claim DLA for their own reasons. Are we really saying that reverse snobbery is okay, "They are rich and don't claim DLA so they shouldn't have a badge". How about a Life Guards Cavalry Officer (they usually have a private income to be commissioned into the regiment) who gets both legs blown off in Afghanistan, he probably won't claim DLA as he will get various pensions, but he will need the blue badge, and he can certainly afford a top of the range Land Rover.
My family have a large people carrier because its easier to get in an out of with sticks , and its easier to store the wheelchairs. Therefore judging likelihoods of being granted a blue badge based on car size is a bit blinkered as well.
NWpostie wrote:The photo blue pass should cut fraud down a lot, like somebody said it should be used if there is a disabled person driving or is a passenger, one of the most popular abuses in some families the disabled person doesn't actually have to drive or is housebound, a family member can use that card for their own convenience and yes I have seen it been done.
Seen that myself and I think it should be a criminal offence. I have 2 members of my family both have a Blue badge and many times we have had to struggle in normal parking bays when all the blue badge spots are taken and its frustrating, but as I don't know each individual reason for having a blue badge, as long as they have them Legally I am not going to judge who is and who isn't entitled to them, they have been through that process already.
Sorry if I am ranting a little bit but for me you committed 2 sins. You made a judgement based on your own prejudices (people driving top of the range cars ) , and you put people into boxes (if A then they must be B) both of which I feel need to be challenged.
Hope we don't fall out.