gfboots wrote:thanks for the advise, what would happen if he had to go home to get his sandwiches etc, would he have to leave his car at work and catch the bus?
That is classed as commuting so he could use his car
gfboots wrote:thanks for the advise, what would happen if he had to go home to get his sandwiches etc, would he have to leave his car at work and catch the bus?
Going home to collect something is classed as commutinggfboots wrote:no ,not every day ,i was just wondering what the difference was by going home in your car to collect something? or using your car to go to your first delivery point?
what about managers?they are using their cars to deliver mail and drop off people to help out on delivery etc..one has his car insured for work purposes,what kind of insurance should he have etc et? i thought once the royal mail insurance bonds were withdrawn after revision then nobody including managers were allowed to use private cars,he seems to think notfishtank wrote:Your insurance covers you travelling to and from work,going home in your car isn't an issue whether it's first thing,last thing,lunchtime or picking up your cheese and pickles.gfboots wrote:,i was just wondering what the difference was by going home in your car to collect something? or using your car to go to your first delivery point?
Using it for actual work purposes like driving to your first delivery point however is considered to be business use and invalidates your own personal insurance,driving without valid insurance is illegal,Royal Mail got around that by providing it's own version of business insurance for private car users.
In offices where DM revisions have occurred that insurance has been withdrawn..completely.
If you do work from your car without the correct insurance you could be standing in the Dock of the local court. Its illegal.Bilbosmeggins wrote:I refused to use my car as of this week. My 1st drop is exactly 4 miles from the DO. Monday they allowed me to use a van, yesterday was my day off. Today I was informed that I was not entitled to a van. I was then told that I had 2 choices: To take on a different round nearer to the office, or to become a "floater". When I asked the specific question "So is a car a pre-requisite for my duty?" the manager got all red-faced and then said that I'd have to use a bike then. Where do I stand on this? I've never used my car out of choice and have never had business insurance. If I allow them to take me off my round then they will just draft in another car owner so they can take the p!ss all over again.
They could try and may indeed succeed, but dependant on various things they shouldn't try it on - get the union involved would be my suggestion.Bilbosmeggins wrote:Thanks for your prompt reply. Are they in a position to relieve me of my duty due to my refusal to use my car? The way the managers are treating and abusing the staff at the office is scandalous. This car situation is just the tip of the iceberg.
And when the police nick you for driving without insurance (you need business use insurance)?seniority19 wrote:If a manager authorises me to use my car, that's good enough for me. Don't give a toss what the union rep thinks...
Your manager doesn't have the authority to override a national agreement because it suits you or him.seniority19 wrote:If a manager authorises me to use my car, that's good enough for me. Don't give a toss what the union rep thinks...
Don't worry schools back on monday.seniority19 wrote:If a manager authorises me to use my car, that's good enough for me. Don't give a toss what the union rep thinks...
seniority19 wrote:If a manager authorises me to use my car, that's good enough for me. Don't give a toss what the union rep thinks...