under estimating handbacks=wilful delay?

daveyeff · Post by **daveyeff** » 04 Aug 2012, 20:16

Lincox wrote:Well Davey, if you have the guts to stand up and face these lying bstrds, and if everyone had the same resilience as your members, then this company would not be getting away with half it does at the moment.

totally agree lincox,, but this blokes had about 17 grievances in against him since he came to our office 2 yrs ago, and 5 b/h accusasions. the b/h cases were ALL downgraded to ''grievances'', and NONE have stuck. he,s called the ''teflon dom''. nowt will happen here either. he,s the dsms blue eyed whizz kid. a hatchet man brought in to chop the numbers. apparently at his last office they were all terrified of him and the union was none existant. he,s not has his own way here though and the union have brought him down a peg or two, he,s nowhere near as arrogant and cocky as when he first came but we need a whistle blower.,,,,,yes ive considered it. annonimity is the key.

daveyeff · Post by **daveyeff** » 04 Aug 2012, 20:19

anyways am gettn pished on me decking at the moment so fek that twat

daveyeff · Post by **daveyeff** » 14 Aug 2012, 16:57

me mates in on thursday to get his ''punishment''.,,,,he,s been told they are going for a 2yr suspended dismissal and the branch said they will appeal it. it would seem they have ''prejudged'' his punishment, as there are 2 witnesses in this whole sorry saga that have yet to be interviewed.!! how can they even try considering it? especially when a lino invented a totally untrue statement (which he,s now retracted) and is allowed to go unpunished. it would seem rm can lie to try to ''up the anti'' against staff and increase charges but go unchallenged when it is brought to light.

Post by **hantsman** » 15 Aug 2012, 22:27

daveyeff wrote:me mates in on thursday to get his ''punishment''.,,,,he,s been told they are going for a 2yr suspended dismissal and the branch said they will appeal it. it would seem they have ''prejudged'' his punishment, as there are 2 witnesses in this whole sorry saga that have yet to be interviewed.!! how can they even try considering it? especially when a lino invented a totally untrue statement (which he,s now retracted) and is allowed to go unpunished. it would seem rm can lie to try to ''up the anti'' against staff and increase charges but go unchallenged when it is brought to light.

I don't believe any of this post to be honest. Did you do as I've advised and get a different manager to hold the conduct interview?

Is it really you daveyeff who this post is about?

daveyeff · Post by **daveyeff** » 16 Aug 2012, 20:50

hantsman wrote:
daveyeff wrote:me mates in on thursday to get his ''punishment''.,,,,he,s been told they are going for a 2yr suspended dismissal and the branch said they will appeal it. it would seem they have ''prejudged'' his punishment, as there are 2 witnesses in this whole sorry saga that have yet to be interviewed.!! how can they even try considering it? especially when a lino invented a totally untrue statement (which he,s now retracted) and is allowed to go unpunished. it would seem rm can lie to try to ''up the anti'' against staff and increase charges but go unchallenged when it is brought to light.
I don't believe any of this post to be honest. Did you do as I've advised and get a different manager to hold the conduct interview?

Is it really you daveyeff who this post is about?

i could,nt give a monkies if you believe it or not,,,ive told the whole lot as it is,, why dont you believe it?? are you a manager like?? no, he didnt get a different manager as he was told there should be no need to with the evidence they have. anyways,,,he was (my mate and colleague, NOT ME) told today they have pinned a 2yr suspended dismissal on him, regardless. the area rep reckons they,ll WALK the appeal. your response has me puzzled, if it was me i would have said, and the rest of the post is as i,ve said.,,,,some people

daveyeff · Post by **daveyeff** » 17 Aug 2012, 16:53

any reason why my last post was removed?

Post by **TrueBlueTerrier** » 18 Aug 2012, 12:44

daveyeff wrote:any reason why my last post was removed?

what did it say. I can't remember deleting it though and I was the only Admin on at the time of your quoted post.

daveyeff · Post by **daveyeff** » 18 Aug 2012, 15:40

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
daveyeff wrote:any reason why my last post was removed?
what did it say. I can't remember deleting it though and I was the only Admin on at the time of your quoted post.

it said ''he has GOT to be a gaffer writing stuff like that'',,,,never mind teebs, it was probably me not submitting it more than likely, i remember typing it out but i must,n have posted it. when you got someone more or less calling you a liar it does tend to vex somewhat

Himaggen · Post by **Himaggen** » 18 Aug 2012, 17:32

daveyeff wrote:it said ''he has GOT to be a gaffer writing stuff like that'',,,,never mind teebs, it was probably me not submitting it more than likely

I seem to recall reading that response too!

daveyeff · Post by **daveyeff** » 18 Aug 2012, 19:20

Himaggen wrote:
daveyeff wrote:it said ''he has GOT to be a gaffer writing stuff like that'',,,,never mind teebs, it was probably me not submitting it more than likely
I seem to recall reading that response too!

cheers himaggen, i thought i had,, but wasnt sure. im losing it with all the recent pressure at graft at the mo. this forum gives us a stress leveller.

daveyeff · Post by **daveyeff** » 29 Oct 2012, 10:39

well,,AT LONG LAST. its finally all over, the union had a meeting with the branch and we had everything out with them about this management team, the way they,ve been treating people, the b/h, the unneccessary suspensions, non payment of overtime week in week out. conduct code being issued at the drop of a hat,,,,everything. there was even personal comments made about the management and what the whole office thought of them. overwhelming support for industrial action.,,,,,the branch were taken aback, but accepted our feelings.,,,,,,as a result every charge this mickey mouse hitman has brought has been dropped, AND, the lad who was given a 2 yrs suspended dismissal has had his case against him dropped as well, with the dsm quoted as saying ''it had more holes in it than swiss cheese.. obvious that though!!,,,,how could they even try to charge someone with such a penalty just short of dismissal when he was found not guilty of the charge. the other dsm is coming over this week to tell us the whole situation and what we can expect from now on. they,ve said they dont want the threat of i/a hanging over a completely revised office and promise its going to be totally fixed, and under observation.,,,,,and the rep has also said its opened the door for the current ''taliban'' to be ousted, in fact they WILL be gone. will they just be shifted though to become someone elses problem. will they be punished or will it be a slap on the wrist. anyways time will tell. very happy at the mo

ROYALMAILCHAT

under estimating handbacks=wilful delay?

Re: under estimating handbacks=wilful delay?

Re: under estimating handbacks=wilful delay?

Re: under estimating handbacks=wilful delay?

Re: under estimating handbacks=wilful delay?

Re: under estimating handbacks=wilful delay?

Re: under estimating handbacks=wilful delay?

Re: under estimating handbacks=wilful delay?

Re: under estimating handbacks=wilful delay?

Re: under estimating handbacks=wilful delay?

Re: under estimating handbacks=wilful delay?

Re: under estimating handbacks=wilful delay?