ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

are posties a bunch of clever-clogs?

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.

what level of education do you have?

degree
58
23%
hnd/equivalent
34
14%
a levels/scottish highers
41
16%
gcse (c or above)/o level/ scottish ordinaries
65
26%
gcse (d or below)
9
4%
other
10
4%
cse
22
9%
left school empty handed
12
5%
 
Total votes: 251

krussel
Posts: 5300
Joined: 26 Jan 2009, 18:03
Gender: Male
Location: Out on the streets.

Re: are posties a bunch of clever-clogs?

Post by krussel »

bunkerland wrote:Anyway,how do we define working,middle class?
I really do not think it actually exists :hmmmm

I ve always thought that if you need to work to live then you are working class. It matters not how big your house is or where you take the kids on holiday or perhaps private school fee's. If you have to put hours into a job to achieve these things then your working class end of.

I dont buy into this middle and lower working class crap. :neutral:
Rows of houses all bearing down on me........I can feel their blue hands touching me.......All these things in all positions.........All these things will one day take control..........
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16736
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: are posties a bunch of clever-clogs?

Post by clashcityrocker »

bunkerland wrote:
Anyway,how do we define working,middle class?
My wife explained this to me not so long ago.
If you are working class you know you are working class.
If you need to ask the question - you are middle class .......and a w****r.

P.S She has a degree and doesn't fart.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
stokes11eg
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3077
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 12:51
Gender: Female

Re: are posties a bunch of clever-clogs?

Post by stokes11eg »

are as follows[citation needed]:There were seven classes- in the early 18th century!

Class Characteristics
Cottagers and labourers Cottagers were a step below husbandmen, in that they had to work for others for wages. Lowest order of the working castes; perhaps vagabonds, drifters, criminals or other outcasts would be lower.
Husbandman (or other tradesmen) A tradesman or farmer who either rented a home or owned very little land was a husbandman. In ancient feudal times, this person likely would have been a serf, and paid a large portion of his work or produce to the land-holding lord.
Yeoman The yeoman class generally included small farmers who held a reasonable amount of land and were able to protect themselves from neighbouring lords et cetera. They played a military role as longbowmen. Sometimes Merchant citizens are placed between Yeoman and Gentry in early modern social hierarchy.
Gentry/Gentleman The gentry by definition held enough assets to live on rents without working, and so could be well educated. If they worked it was in law, as priests, in politics, or in other educated pursuits without manual labour. The term Esquire was used for landowners who were not knighted. Many gentry families were armigerous and of ancient lineage possessing great wealth and large estates.
Knight The definition of a knight depends upon the century in which the term was applied. In very early medieval times a knight was a common soldier; later as cavalry became more important the knight's role became more associated with wealth. By the seventeenth century a knight was a senior member of the gentry, and the military role would be one of sheriff of a county, or organising a larger body of military forces, or in civil service exercising judicial authority. He was a large land owner, and his younger sons would often be lawyers, priests, or officials of some sort.
Baronet (hereditary, non peer) A baronet held a hereditary style of knighthood, giving the highest rank below a peerage.
Peer (Noble/Archbishop) The peers were generally large land holders, living solely off assets, sat in the House of Lords and either held court or played a role in court depending upon the time frame referenced.
Royal A member of the royal family, a prince, a close relative of the queen or king.
LOL! That was then, now there are too many classes and sub classes to list! If you are working as a postie, you come under semi-skilled!
20th century
Tman
Posts: 4147
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57

Re: are posties a bunch of clever-clogs?

Post by Tman »

It doesn't matter who you were aiming it at,it was someone you didn't know(most likely me :neutral: ) and you had no idea what their level of education actually might be.
You need to get over this. The thread was about people with (or without degrees) and others' attitudes, as brought up by McSlap and really nothing towards you in the slightest, other than in one of your posts a while back in the thread you over-generalised in a negative way about degrees and what benefits (or not) they can bring, and that was used as an example.
From that post alone it was pretty safe to assume you didn't have a degree, as someone who had worked hard academically for a possible five years would hardly be likely to be so negative toward degrees in general (as if that was relevant in any way to the point)



rather than believe that someone who has benefited from a decent education may feel this way you stick anyone who dares take that position into the bitter,inverted snobbery,underachieving,working class box.
This reiteration is tedious and I didn't "stick anyone" anywhere. The "inverted snobbery" thing was in reply to McSlap who listed the bollix he has to listen to from people without degrees; the "University of Life" "pointless degree" and "get a job" etc, all the stuff students and graduates have to endure from those who never went, and they're the inverted snobs.
Absolutely nothing to do with decrying those didn't go but chose something else to do.
taurus88
Posts: 1259
Joined: 14 Aug 2010, 17:53
Gender: Male

Re: are posties a bunch of clever-clogs?

Post by taurus88 »

Well, based on this thread, there's a few things we can say for certain:

- the title of this thread should be 'are posties a bunch of w@nkers?'
- the definitive answer to that question is 'yes'.

All-in-all, we'd have saved a lot of time doing it that way.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72771
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: are posties a bunch of clever-clogs?

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJyMDqQN ... re=related" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Oxford educated and daughter of a former Post Boy - Blimey she fits in all the boxes and yet none of them (just like most of us), thats the problem with generalising.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: are posties a bunch of clever-clogs?

Post by dvbuk55 »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJyMDqQN ... re=related

Oxford educated and daughter of a former Post Boy - Blimey she fits in all the boxes and yet none of them (just like most of us), thats the problem with generalising.
No I can't believe women fart, it can't be true because I have never heard a woman admit to letting rip with a stinker on IPS :whistle
bunkerland
Posts: 546
Joined: 11 Oct 2009, 21:40
Gender: Male

Re: are posties a bunch of clever-clogs?

Post by bunkerland »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote: thats the problem with generalising.
Surely you mean...........thats SOMETIMES the problem with generalising? :hmmmm

You can't always generalise about generalising! :no no
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72771
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: are posties a bunch of clever-clogs?

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

bunkerland wrote:
TrueBlueTerrier wrote: thats the problem with generalising.
Surely you mean...........thats SOMETIMES the problem with generalising? :hmmmm

You can't always generalise about generalising! :no no
:chuckle :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle

Image
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.